Samenvatting

Summary SciO Overview Table, Weeks 6-11 (Exam II)

0 keer verkocht

Instelling
Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)

This overview ultimately helped me to get a 7.3. I fused together all articles for each week and ordered them in a table. For each article, I wrote a short note about the main subject, the findings, as well as implications. It was a lifesaver during the very short amount of time available for the e...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 15 augustus 2018
Aantal pagina's 7
Geschreven in 2018/2019
Type Samenvatting

Volgen

kateralsi Lid sinds 6 jaar 20 documenten verkocht

An Overview

Week 6, Diversity
Hofhuis e. A. 2016)J Jansen e. A. 2016)J Knippenberg 20114J

Defines diversi.y as: Defines diversi.y as: Defines diversi.y as:

“an organizatona. c.ima.e None given “diferences be.ween
charac.erized by openness individua.s on any atribu.e
.owards and/or appreciaton .ha. may .ead .o .he
of individua. diferences” percepton .ha. ano.her
person is diferen. from se.f”

Focus: how diversi.y c.ima.e Focus: diversi.y c.ima.e Focus: e.aboraton of .ask-
re.a.es .o communicaton s.ra.egies and .heir efec.s re.evan. informaton

Emphasis on .wo main Emphasis on .wo s.ra.egies: Emphasis on
charac.eristcs:
co.orb.ind approach  peop.e in.ergroup biases .ha. may
Trus.  .he wi..ingness of a shou.d be .rea.ed equa..y as resu.. from socia.
par.y .o be vu.nerab.e .o .he individua.s/group diferences ca.egorizaton disrup.
actons of ano.her par.y 2more shou.d be ignored e.aboraton of .ask-re.evan.
diversi.y = more .rus.?J informaton and perspectves
mu.tcu..ura. approach 
Openness  an organizatona. diferences be.ween cu..ura.
norm which promo.es free groups shou.d be
disc.osure of informaton acknow.edged and are
2more diversi.y = more benefcia. for work processes
openness?J

Findings: Findings: Findings:
Diversi.y is good! Reduces Positve work ou.comes for Diversi.y positve.y re.a.es .o
ca.egorizaton/discriminaton majori.y when co.orb.ind e.aboraton  diverse .eams
whi.e enhancing know.edge s.ra.egy, bu. positve work .hus advan.aged a. so.ving
sharing 2when media.ed by ou.comes for minori.y when comp.ex .asks
openness and .rus.J mu.tcu.t s.ra.egy
Motvaton & abi.i.y modera.e
Equa.i.y in co.orb.ind .his
presumed simi.ari.y .ha. .ef
.it.e room for individua.
expression

Equa.i.y in mu.tcu.t atached
va.ue .o each background

Implications: Implications Implications
None given Need .o move beyond binary Fos.ering e.aboraton &
s.ra.egy approach  more motvaton whi.e preventng
inc.usiveness is necessary! in.ergroup biases

, Week 7, Stereotyping
Ku.ik e. A. 2016)J Leonardi e. A. 20163J Vinkenburg 20166J

Definition Definiton Definition

“socia..y shared and readi.y None given Non given
actva.ed, bu. s.ereo.ype
sa.ience varies across
si.uatons and con.ex.s”
Focus: ma.ure workers and Focus: sensemaking and Focus: diferences men and
s.ereo.ype .hrea.s communicaton women as .eaders
accomendaton
Emphasis on Emphasis on Emphasis on

“fluid, si.uatona. .hrea.” .ha. Sensemaking aspec.: descriptve be.iefs, which
is evoked by sub..e cues Dispersed .eams make i. per.ain .o .he .ypica. atribu.es
signa.ing .ha. one’s ident.y harder .o overcome of women and men
group may no. be va.ued in .he s.ereo.ypes
immedia.e environmen. prescriptve be.iefs, which
cu..ure-based occupatona. per.ain .o .heir idea. or
S.ereo.ype .hrea. disrup.s .ask s.ereo.ypes wou.d surface in desirab.e atribu.es
performance and negatve.y .hese kinds of in.eractons .o
impac.s an individua.’s in.erpre. ambigui.y and guide
motvaton and engagemen. behavior

Findings: Findings: Findings:
s.ereo.ype .hrea. can .ead .o perceived diferences in s.a.us Partcipan.s knew abou.
psycho.ogica. disengagemen. can actva.e behaviors aimed women having more efectve
from .he performance domain a. ei.her reconci.ing .hose .eadership s.y.es, indicatng a
divergen. s.ereo.ypes or sub..er bias
ident.y b.ind high main.aining .hem
performance practce bund.e & This cou.d inc.ude ideas abou.
ident.y conscious ma.ure-age s.ereo.ype actvaton = feminini.y and con.radictons
practce bund.e were cons.ructon of se.f- and o.her- wi.h agentc behavior
associa.ed wi.h .ower s.ereo.ypes as individua.s necessary for .eadership
s.ereo.ype .hrea. draw from .heir avai.ab.e
cu..ura. reper.oires

Implications: Implications Implications
Need .o recognize cues of None given None given
actvaton + hire more ma.ure
workers

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.