100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) €2,67
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. Constitutional Law

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)
 1 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Constitutional Law
  • Instelling
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Boek
  • South African Constitutional Law in Context

CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) ASSIGNMENT 2 QUESTIONS Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or False [40 marks. Each answe...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 12  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 22 februari 2024
  • 12
  • 2023/2024
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

  • csl2601 assignment 2 memo semester 1 2024 unis

Gekoppeld boek

book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:

Geschreven voor

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Constitutional Law
Alle documenten voor dit vak (53)

Verkoper

avatar-seller
LLBExampacksAndTutorials

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.




CSL2601
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: -
DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.




ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or False [40 marks. Each answer is worth 2 marks]

1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly 2018 (2) SA 571 (CC) (EFF II) is that the
judiciary has too much political power and intrudes into the executive domain.

2. As a member of the uMkhonto we Sizwe party, former President Jacob Zuma has announced his intention to campaign against the right of LGBTIQ+
people to a family life. His opinion is that the ‘legislation supporting same-sex marriage lacks support from the majority of SA’. This scenario is an
example of the principle of subsidiarity.

3. When carefully analysed, the recent case of United Democratic Movement and Others v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 280;
005779/2023 (5 May 2023) – the “loadshedding” case – is an instance of judicial over-reach.

4. The counter-majoritarian dilemma has no relevance to South African Constitutional Law. It is simply a convenient excuse that politicians invoke when
the judiciary is counter- revolutionary.

5. The horizontal distribution of power in South Africa is exactly how multi-sphere governance works in South Africa.

QUESTIONS CONTINUE…


Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.



PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za

, ASSIGNMENT 2 QUESTIONS


Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or
False [40 marks. Each answer is worth 2 marks]


1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker
of the National Assembly 2018 (2) SA 571 (CC) (EFF II) is that the judiciary has too
much political power and intrudes into the executive domain.
2. As a member of the uMkhonto we Sizwe party, former President Jacob Zuma has
announced his intention to campaign against the right of LGBTIQ+ people to a
family life. His opinion is that the ‘legislation supporting same-sex marriage lacks
support from the majority of SA’. This scenario is an example of the principle of
subsidiarity.
3. When carefully analysed, the recent case of United Democratic Movement and
Others v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 280; 005779/2023
(5 May 2023) – the “loadshedding” case – is an instance of judicial over-reach.
4. The counter-majoritarian dilemma has no relevance to South African
Constitutional Law. It is simply a convenient excuse that politicians invoke when
the judiciary is counter- revolutionary.
5. The horizontal distribution of power in South Africa is exactly how multi-sphere
governance works in South Africa.
6. The formal removal of an official office-bearer for gross misconduct or gross
incompetence is known as recusal.
7. According to the case of de Lille and Another v Speaker of the National Assembly
1998 (3) SA 785 (CC), parliamentary privilege is the right to freedom of speech of
members of parliament and the protection not to be held liable to civil or criminal
proceedings, arrest, imprisonment or damages for saying or revealing anything in
Parliament.
8. The responsibility placed on the legislature to include the views of interested
parties by permitting submissions being made and considering these views in
good faith is known as public participation.

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,67. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€2,67  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd