Samenvatting

Summary course 3.5 Organizational Psychology

1 keer verkocht

Vak
56604 (FSWP3085A)

Instelling
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)

Summary of all the literature used in course 3.5 of the organizational psychology specialization (International Bachelor of Psychology). Includes lecture notes. Individual Authors Mentioned + Article Name

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 124 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 28 februari 2024
Aantal pagina's 124
Geschreven in 2023/2024
Type Samenvatting

€26,49

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

PROBLEM 1

Organizational Theory and Design (Ch.13) – Jex and Britt
• Organizational theory à conceptual ideas about the nature of organizations – how
they work and interact with their outside environment
• Organizational design à plans that are made when theorizing about the organization
o Macro-level issues – not usually researched by psychologists. A problem
because:
§ Employees are influenced by the organizational structure (maybe
indirectly) e.g. how departments are grouped in a university has
implications for resource allocation and how much the different
departments communicate
ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY
• Sociology is the lead theorizer in organizational theory
• Organizational theory = the study of the best wat to organize work organizations
• It is difficult to measure organizational theories as orgs. Cannot be easily subjected to
investigation à therefore they use ‘metaphors’ to describe and understand org.
structure
Major Organizational Theories
Classical Organizational Theories (1940s)
• Based on classical conditioning à believes that humans will not work unless they are
given a reason to + they lack creativity and initiative to define their own roles in the
org.
• Scientific Management:
o Description:
§ Those that design the work should be separate from those who
perform it
§ Work should be divided into small and simple components
o Tangible implications:
§ There should be hierarchical differences between employees à those
that design the work should be at a higher hierarchical position
§ Employees should be grouped according to how similar their tasks are
+ departmental structure can be created (seen in textiles and car
companies)
• Therefore, an organization designed with scientific
management will have a lot of departments
o Less Tangible Implications
§ Scientific organization = more rules + procedures to follow
• Ideal Bureaucracy
o Made by Max Weber during the industrial revolution when businesses moved
from being family run to more industrial ones
§ Old organizational models couldn’t be used in large organizations
anymore
o Primary assumptions:
§ Rewards should be based on the contributions to the organization (not
familiar connections like it was done before)
§ Strong reliance on old rules and procedures = not good in novel
situations

, o Important Principles
§ Very close supervision of employees à manager only supervises a
small group of people (small span of control) which allows to keep a
close eye on all
• Also means that they can meet the needs of their subordinates
+ can easily train them
§ Unity of command à in a bureaucratic structure, employees have only
1 direct supervisor
• Can be beneficial for employees as they don’t worry about
meeting different expectations = less role conflict (seen in
modern orgs)
§ Unity of direction à information within the bureaucratic org. flows in
one direction (usually from top levels to lower)
• Benefit: increases predictability and stability + top managers
can better control the information that reaches the lower levels
o Possible to combine it with other org. forms
• Administrative Management – Henri Fayol
o Tried developing a universal set of organizing principles for managers to apply
in org.
o Management functions à most important behaviors and activities of managers
§ Planning, organizing, commanding, coordination, and controlling
§ Fayol proposed principles that would help managers achieve these
functions
§ Many of the principles overlap with Ideal Bureaucracy (e.g. unity of
direction)
o Examples of unique principles (not similar to I.B.):
§ Stability of personnel, encouraging people to take initiative, and having
a high level of cohesion among employees
o Major criticism: treats employees as ‘cogs in a machine’ that can easily be
replaced
Humanistic Organizational Theories (1960s)
• Theory XY
o There are 2 types of managers:
§ Theory X managers = believe that people don’t like working and
therefore need to be monitored closely and coerced to reach the goals
of the org
• Also believe that employees have little ambition, aren’t self-
directed and value security over all else
§ Theory Y managers = believe that work is a natural part of everyone’s
life and people seek to find meaning in it. Ppl are capable of self-
control and will strive towards org. goals
• Under the right conditions, employees will seek out
responsibility and use creativity to solve org. problems
• Believes that orgs are designed in a way that limits the
employee’s skills and talents
o These theories are for managers but can be extended to an organizational
level:

, § Theory X org. = narrow span of control, strict lines of authority, a lot of
rules and procedures (standardized work process9
§ Theory Y org. = wide spans of control, flexible lines of authority, limited
rules
• Leads to more psychologically fulfilling jobs for employees bcs
it can lead to personal growth
• Downside: since lines of authority are blurred = more role
conflict
• Human Organization – Likert
o Organizations can be classified into 4 types
o System 1= exploitive authoritarian type à like Theory X, little trust in
employees, little communication with management, centralized decision
making, control is ‘top-down’
§ Leads to dissatisfied employees and low levels of org. performance
o System 2 = benevolent authoritative à like System 1 BUT a bit more trust in
employees + communication. It’s very authoritative but they are nicer to
employees
§ Leads to moderate levels of satisfaction in work and fair org.
performance
o System 3 = consultative à a lot more trust in employees so their ideas are used
more. More communication (from bottom up). Decision making is still
centralized BUT how authority is exerted is different from system 1 and 2
§ Top level makes board policies, lower levels can make more specific
operational decisions (boundaries are given by managers and workers
make decisions within those boundaries)
o System 4 = participative group à opposite of system 1. Managers have
complete trust in employees, seek their input before making decisions,
communication is free-flowing in all directions, teamwork is encouraged,
decision making made at all levels
§ Likert believed that this is the only one capable of ‘excellent’
performance
• J.G. Likert and Araki à further developed the 4 systems and added a 5th
o System 5 à similar to system 4 BUT emphasizes the absence of bosses e.g.
universities where departments are self-managed
• Problem with all these theories: they assume that there is a ‘best’ way to lead an
organization
Contingency Organizational Theories
• Developed because scientists realized that there isn’t a singular set of traits or
behaviors that distinguish good from bad leaders
• Congruence perspective – Huber
o Organizations should be designed so that they are congruent with the
organization’s strategy and factors like: characteristics of the employees, type
of work etc.
• What internal and external factors do organizations need to pay attention to when
designing their organization? (next section)
Determinants of Organizational Design
• Organizational design must serve a purpose
Strategy

, • Organizational strategy = long-range goals and ways to reach these
• Different strategies in organizations influence staffing, reward systems, compensations
etc.
• Aspect of org. structure that has the largest impact on strategy implementation:
o Specializationà types and number of specialties used in the org.
§ High specialization = better performance BUT difficult when products
keep changing (doesn’t allow for quick reactions9
o Shape of the organization à how many people are in the hierarchical chain
form departments?
§ Narrow organization = a lot of levels but few individuals at
each
• More time + energy spent on communication,
supervision and decision making. Spends a lot of
time ‘running itself’ – better for companies
producing highly specialized products in markets
where demands are consistent e.g. apple?
§ Flat organization = few levels but a lot of employees at each
• Less time + energy spent on internal processes –
allow for quicker responses to consumer demands –
found in org. in new/emerging sectors of economy
e.g. google?
o Distribution of power à depends on how decisions are made:
§ Vertical distribution of decision-making power = how much are
decisions centralized or decentralized?
• Centralized = headquarters make all the decisions
• Decentralized = lower levels make decisions (workers)
§ Horizontal distribution of decision-making power = is decision making
power shifted to the department that has the best information or to top
managers?
• E.g. giving this power to employees that deal with customers
• If quick responses to market conditions need to be made, it is
better to leave the decision-making power to those closer to
customers
o Organization’s departmental structure à departments are made according to
different criteria e.g. function
§ Departmentalization by function – e.g. marketing, production and HR =
most common
• Advantage: promotes high levels of specialization = high
performance in each area
• Weaknesses: better for companies that produce a single
product/limited number (if it grows then it might overwhelm
team)
o Doesn’t promote sharing ideas across departments
(leads to very closed compartments – e.g. university
faculties don’t talk much)
• Functional strategy works best in a stable environment without
much technological change e.g. federal government agencies,
Post It

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper martacazzamalli. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €26,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69988 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis