100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Samenvatting Blok 3.3 Motivation, Selfregulation and Performance Probleem 4 €6,49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Samenvatting Blok 3.3 Motivation, Selfregulation and Performance Probleem 4

 47 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Volledige samenvatting alle artikelen Probleem 4 - Intention to Procrastinate. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Psychologie. 3e jaar. Full summary of all articles Problem 4 - Intention to Procrastinate. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Psychology. 3rd year. Motivation, Selfregulation and Performance.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 15  pagina's

  • 14 december 2018
  • 15
  • 2018/2019
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (33)
avatar-seller
studenterasmus
PROBLEM 4 – INTENTION TO PROCRASTINATE

Part 1:
1. What influncus procrastination What is it
2. How can yol pruvunt it
3. Aru thuru pursonal difuruncus -> Difurunt typus of procrastinators
Part 2:
1. What aru implumuntation intuntions Do thuy work
2. Why do puoplu fail to transform thuir intuntions to actlal buhavior


HOWELL ET AL. (2006): ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION: THE
PATTERN AND CORRELATES OF BEHAVIOURAL
POSTPONEMENT.

Focus on: understanding the idea of temporal discounting; you don't have to
know all the details of the methods, but it is helpful to look at how the study
variables are measured (e.g. behavior vs self-reports); support found for
temporal discouting? Other results?

Temporal discounting: when a reward (like a good grade on a test) is still far
away, students won’t start to study yet. When the reward (deadline) is coming
closer, students will start studying. Procrastinators show temporal discounting 
they appreciate a certain reward more when it’s closer.

The ‘nomological network’ of procrastination
The hyperbolic pattern of postponement can be conceptualized as a failure of
self-regulation, such that procrastinators relative to non-procrastinators have a
reduced ability to resist social temptations when the benefts of academic
preparation are distant.
- Implementation intention: determining the when, where and how of one’s
behaviour in relation to accomplishing a personal goal.
- Say-do correspondence: the extent to which individuals do what they say they
will do or carry out promises they have made.
- Perceived academic control: students’ beliefs about whether factors within
themselves or outside of themselves determine academic success.

Aim of the research: to investigate a behavioural measure of postponement
and to further explore the ‘nomological network’ of procrastination.

Hypotheses:
- Students will reveal a pattern of temporal discounting.
- This pattern would especially characterize those who describe themselves as
procrastinators.
- Implementation intentions, say-do correspondence and perceived academic
control will correlate positively with each other and negatively with both self-
reported procrastination and behavioural postponement.

How were the study variables measured?
- Procrastination Assessment Scale  students had to rate the extent to which
they procrastinate and the extent to which this is a problem for them (also
Procrastination Scale).



1

, - Perceived Academic Control measure  self-report.
- Self-reported assignment procrastination.
- Implementation intentions  self-report.
- Say-do correspondence  self-report.

Discussion:
The fndings reveal a tendency to postpone submission of assignments until the
hours immediately prior to the submission deadline. The tendency to postpone
assignment submissions was most pronounced among students who reported
that they procrastinated on their assignment sub- missions.

Correlations:
The three self-report procrastination measures correlated signifcantly with each
other and with the behavioural measure of postponement.
The three measures of self-reported procrastination correlated signifcantly with
say-do correspondence.
Say-do correspondence didn’t correlate with the behavioural measure of
postponement.
Say-do correspondence correlated signifcantly with implementation intentions.
Implementation intentions were not consistently related to procrastination.
Perceived academic control correlated with course grades.


STEEL (2007): THE NATURE OF PROCRASTINATION: A META-
ANALYTIC AND THEORETICAL REVIEW OF QUINTESSENTIAL
SELF-REGULATORY FAILURE.

Focus on:
understanding the defnition of procrastination. You don't have to know the
history of procrastination. You have to understand what the personality traits
represent and know whether they are found to be related to procrastination
(strongest/weakest relation? --> see Table 1 & Table 4). Furthermore, you have
to know the main outcomes of procrastination (i.e., mood & performance) + be
able to give an example of interventions aimed at reducing procrastination.
Lastly, you have to understand the TMT-model. Don't focus on too much details!

Defnition of procrastination
The focus in this article is on the negative form of procrastination. One
procrastinates when one delays beginning or completing an intended course of
action. It is considered to be the irrational delay of behaviour. Being irrational
entails choosing a course of action despite expecting that it will not maximize
your utilities, that is, your interests, preferences, or goals of both a material (e.g.,
money) and a psychological (e.g., happiness) nature. Combining these elements
suggests that to procrastinate is to voluntarily delay an intended course of action
despite expecting to be worse of for the delay.

Procrastination as a Personality Trait
Research suggests procrastination has sufcient cross-temporal and situational
stability. There appears to be a biological or genetic component to
procrastination. But where does it ft in the fve-factor model?
Procrastination may be considered to be the most central facet of
conscientiousness, but it is not conscientiousness itself.

Personality traits


2

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper studenterasmus. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67232 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49
  • (0)
  Kopen