100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary of readings for Qualitative research methods - grade 9.5 €9,39   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary of readings for Qualitative research methods - grade 9.5

 6 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Summary of all required readings for QRM. The numbering of the lectures might differ a bit because we had some schedule changes but all topics are included :)

Voorbeeld 2 van de 15  pagina's

  • 3 april 2024
  • 15
  • 2023/2024
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)
avatar-seller
hueckinglisa
Lecture 1 - Quant. & Qual Research; Positivist & Interpretive Research
Brady: Data-Set Observations vs. Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 US
Pres. Election
- Data-Set Observations: standard regression analysis
- Causal-Process Observations: diagnostic “nuggets” of data that make a strong contribution
to causal inference, uses process tracing (seeks to establish the "physical and social
processes through which purported causes affect outcomes"
- researchers oriented toward the use of causal-process observations would ask whether the
result makes any sense
- Investigating causal processes in close detail to see if the posited causal effect is probable


Goertz, Gary, Mahoney. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative
Research in the Social Sciences, Introduction
- qualitative research set apart from quantitative by (1) within-case analysis, such as process
tracing (stats cross-case analysis), (2) logic and set theory, which informs all major qual.
techniques (using logic to formulate theories and conceptualization (vs. stats))
- number of N is correlated with type of research but does not define it, not just “numbers vs.
words”


Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, Yanow: Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and
Processes
- distinction between methodology and methods; methodology= presuppositions concerning
ontology and epistemology informing a set of methods
- distinction between quant., qual. And interpretative research


The Politics of Deliberation: Qāt Chews as Public Spheres in Yemen
- minimalist definition of democracy (solely based on contested elections) needs revision
- Habermasian “public sphere” theory: public sphere activities work politically.

, - everyday practices of political contestation outside of electoral channels confound aspects
of both the minimalist and the Habermasian frameworks
- problem with binary classification of regime
- “Rather, I argue that there are different sites for enacting democracy, and a robust
democracy needs to be using them all. Thus, a consideration of democracy also requires
theorizing about aspects of substantive representation that are evident in Yemen, namely,
the widespread, inclusive mobilization of critical, practical discourses in which people
articulate and think through their moral and material demands in public” (p. 63)
- Yemen employs more democratic practices/citizen influence than other countries in the
Middle East ➜ shift attention away from formal considerations of electoral outcomes to
other dimensions of participatory politics
- Qāt Chews: open to public, political in four senses:
➜ policy decisions are made, people make use of them to share information about political
events, they are a forum of negotiating power relationships between elites and
constituencies, public participating is not just social category but existential one
- Habermas theory focused on Europe BUT “Yemen is not a bourgeois society, and the
Yemeni public sphere does not arise out of bourgeois notions of individuality or privacy in
the intimate world of the family” AND “Qāt chews are not predicated on the existence of
robust state institutions but actually thrive in their absence”
- “Qāt chews as an institutionalized everyday practice can serve both ruler and ruled,
providing an authoritarian regime with crucial information while giving ordinary individuals
and an organized opposition more freedom than they would enjoy in other authoritarian
circumstances” (p. 79)
- Example raises distinction between democratic practices and liberal values
- Democratic practices not necessarily mean democratic regime
- We should therefore avoid minimalist view on democracy and instead think of democratic
practices

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper hueckinglisa. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,39. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€9,39
  • (0)
  Kopen