This document is a very detailed, comprehensive collection of all my lecture notes and working group notes and assignment answers. As a bonus, I have also included a detailed list of everything you should know for the first 6 weeks. I based my (very limited) studying off this list I made and manage...
UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN
PUBLIC LAW 2017/18
LECTURE NOTES
WEEK 1A 16/4-2018
History of Constitutionalism
Government should try to serve people, instead of people serving them. Leaders of countries
should be bound by fundamental rules: rule of law; everyone bound by law
—> “not bound by men but by measures”
—> everyone is equal
—> liberal democracy
- 16th century
- No country left that doesn't claim themselves democracy —> but sharia law is in conflict
with democracy (Saudi Arabia and Iran)
5-6 countries without written constitution
- Great Britain
5-6 countries that do not recognise sovereignty of people
- Netherlands
———
16th century
- Middle Ages ends —> Renaissance
- Our view of the world changed
- 15th century: Portuguese sail around finding end of Africa —> Columbus
- Technical breakthroughs: printing press
• Before: writing limited to limited group (clergy) —> Church controlled what was written
• After: censorship invented (anyone could print = new ideas), travelled fast
• New idea: Reformation = protestantism —> Martin Luther published = religious strife
• Monarch has to uphold true religion —> catholic vs protestant
• Do you obey your ruler despite him having a different religion? (Luther = Yes; Calvin = no you
revolt) = war
Religious Wars
- Germany lost 1/3 of pop in 30 Years war
- NL 18 years war: west of NL experienced less war = economically the strongest; before the
south was
- How can you end the wars?
• France: Jean Bodin (legal scholar and advisor to king) => Kings do not have enough power
to solve religious strife => abolish idea for State to bargain public powers; public powers are
public that belong only to State
- Private and Public law are two different things!
- Bodin invented word “Sovereign” to describe State => King is sovereign because he
acts on behalf of State = not bound by earlier kings decisions or limits set by foreign
powers
- French king was sovereign = Pope not superior => could implement religious
tolerance
Absolute Monarchy
• France => sovereignty (Bodin); Louis 14th = Sun King (everything rotates around it) => the king
wills it
• England: Parliament vs King = parliament won (is sovereign)
, UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN
PUBLIC LAW 2017/18
Peace of Westphalia: all States of Europe are sovereign States = equals
—> no ruler has the right to interfere in another State’s internal affairs
Thomas Hobbes: British philosopher
- Learned about sovereignty when exiled to France
- “Leviathan” : The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil
• Human beings —> driven by fear because we know we’re mortal = in constant motion
—> humans want security
• We need someone to enforce contracts = the sovereign
• Sovereign gets power from the people
• BUT limits on sovereign power
• Sovereign is not bound by foreign religious power => cant force people to believe, can
only force them to follow => you cant control peoples’ conscience!! => Freedom of
Conscience = HUMAN RIGHTS
Decat: break stuff down to elementary elements to understand
- invented word “Individual”
———
Important things to know
• Reformation and effects (war)
• Jean Bodin (sovereignty)
• Thomas Hobbes
• Absolute monarchy: UK king vs parliament
• Peace of Westphalia = external sovereignty
WEK 1B 17/4-2018
Revolutions and Constitutions
Hobbes elaborated on sovereignty. Put limits on sovereign’s power.
—> State’s power:
• Law is not bound by religious truth
• Hobbes said you should obey sovereign even if he is a heretic
• “The authority, not the truth, makes the law”
—> Limits:
• State cannot kill you
• State does not control peoples’ conscience
—> Human beings are essentially pragmatic
State shouldn't with our life
John Locke:
• Human beings are less problematic
• Published 1689: no more religious strife
• Heavily influenced by Hobbes
• We should live in a State based on an agreement amongst ourselves
• We should give up some of our natural rights to live in the State
• The State should have powers but they shouldn't be unlimited (escape wolves by going into lion’s
den)
• Two Treatises of Government: the State should have powers, we should give up some of our
rights, but the State shouldn't involve itself in our life, liberty, and our possessions (estate) =
property
, UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN
PUBLIC LAW 2017/18
• State shouldn't interfere with our property : how?
1. Agreement amongst ourselves —> were going to build a State and establish a
government
2. Agreement between citizens and State —> powers and limits the government has;
fundamental norms —> citizens should have influence on State’s decisions =>
popular assembly (parliament elected by the people renewed regularly —>
legislative power)
Powers should be guaranteed
Powers should not be in the hand of one State organ —> separation of powers
1. Executive
2. Legislative
3. Federative
Clause in second agreement: the people have the right of rebellion
Absolute Monarchy
—> modern idea
FRANCE:
Montesquieu: Trias Politica
- 1742: “Spirit of the Laws” —> descriptions of most known societies —> causal link;
no one answer to ‘how should we live?’ —> comparative law
- On the government of England: legislative, executive, judicial
Rousseau:
- 1762: “Contrat Social”
- Previous thinking = If you want to live in a State you have to give up certain
freedoms (Hobbes said a lot, Locke said not so much); liberty means having
set no limits upon you BUT Rousseau: remain as free as we were before while
enjoying protection of laws
- Freedom is a moral (not natural); laws of nature are not limits upon our nature
but the structure within which freedom exists —> limitlessness is not freedom
- Even if there are no laws, there will still be laws (natural laws)
- Laws are the structure within which freedom can exist —> not a boundary but
an expression of freedom
- These laws need to confer to certain standards; must have the same character
as natural laws (as much as possible) = culture should be an imitation of nature
=> we are all equal
- Laws are binding only when they are supported by the general will of the
people
- Everyone should make the laws so they are equal for all of us —> need a
popular assembly => States should be small (so that everyone’s voices can
be heard)
- Sovereignty shouldn't be limited because we are all sovereign (everyone
makes the laws)
- You should be forced to be free
- Problem: you need virtuous laws to make virtuous people and virtuous
people to make virtuous laws
- He is the first since Boudin to claim that sovereignty is unlimited. He doesn't
place it in the hands of the King, but in the hands of the people! —> the
sovereign is us (can relate to Hobbes, because we install the sovereign)
, UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN
PUBLIC LAW 2017/18
Sieyes - You need something to express the opinion of the people
(Rousseau suggested small States)
- 1789: “What is the Third Estate” —> elected to Estates General
- We should have a parliament
- Sovereign knows no legal bounds —> is not part of the legal order, but precedes it and
creates legal order (is the source)
- The sovereign cannot act within the legal order because we have limits there =>
Sovereignty is limitlessness
- Representation: parliament —> the will of the parliament is the will of the nation!
- People should elect constitutive assembly who write constitution then is dissolved then
parliament is elected which presents the people within the legal order
- Nation(sovereign): constitutive powers —> created legal order
- All State organs: Constituted powers —> exists within legal order
France: Napoleon Bonaparte
• The French nation is sovereign but I am the representative —> the French nation speaks through
me => whenever making an important decision he held a referendum
• Popular sovereignty (can lead to people such as Napoleon) => after napoleon was removed,
much of Europe didn't like popular sovereignty => many kings claimed sovereignty but gave
citizens a constitution => royal sovereignty
18th century: value-driven
19th century constitutions: descriptive and some fundamental rights (ex dutch and danish)
20th century: value-driven (ex german 1949 —> all state power belongs to people)
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper melinae. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
