100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
ITL Exercise 3 €6,49
In winkelwagen

Antwoorden

ITL Exercise 3

 2 keer verkocht

Answer of the Exercise assigned for week 3 of the course International Trade Law of the Master Globalisation and Law at Maastricht University.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 13  pagina's

  • 30 januari 2019
  • 13
  • 2017/2018
  • Antwoorden
  • Onbekend
Alle documenten voor dit vak (9)
avatar-seller
rx
International Trade Law
Exercise 3: Organic cofee (I)
1. Customs duties are only governed by the MFN-treatment rules.
Since we are dealing with a good and not a service, the MFN-
treatment rule of the GATT applies and more specifcally Article I:1
of the GATT. This obligation is of general application and the
exceptions are few. Worth mentioning here is the Enabling Clause
and the GSP, under which developed countries can give preferential
treatment to developing countries and are then not subject to the
MFN-treatment, whereas in EC – Preferential tariff it was
established that these concessions should be granted to developing
countries in the same situation. As seen in the case, Poorland is
granted such a preferential treatment. However, it is unclear from
the facts whether Poorland is in the same situation as Alexandria,
so for the course of this assessment, it is thought that it is in a
diferent ‘leaguet of developing countries than Alexandria in line
with the EC – Preferential tariff-ruling, so Welland can treat
Alexandria diferently than Poorland. Therefore, three comparisons
between tarif levels in Welland need to be made:
a. 8% ad valorem on organic cofee v. 10% ad valorem on non-
organic unroasted cofee
b. 8% ad valorem on organic cofee v. 15% ad valorem on non-
organic roasted cofee
c. 10% ad valorem on non-organic unroasted cofee v. 15% ad
valorem on non-organic roasted cofee
For all these measures, the test of inconsistency will be done along
four tiers:
- Is the measure covered by Article I of the GATT?  Article I
covers both border and internal measures, especially relevant in
this case is that it covers customs duties and other charges




1

, - Does the measure confer any trade advantage?  any advantage
to any country (so can also be a non-WTO member!), and can be
de jure or de facto (i.e. EC – Seal Productf)
- Are the products concerned ‘liket?  an analysis of the nature
and extent of the competitive relationship on the relevant market
(including product characteristics, end-use, tarif classifcation,
consumer habits and preferences  ethical concerns about
PPMs can only be relevant if they afect buying behaviour),
whereby the intent of the implementing country does not matter
- Whether the advantage is granted immediately and
unconditionally  the ‘liket product from another Member
should receive the same treatment without conditions
a. – The ad valorem-rates are customs duties, and as such fall
within the scope of Article I:1 of the GATT;
– The measure de facto gives an advantage to countries
producing organic unroasted cofee beans (in the form of a
2%-lower custom on their products);
– The only diference between organic unroasted cofee beans
and non-organic unroasted cofee beans is that in their
production process, these former is not subject to pesticides
and other chemicals and the latter is. However, if PPMs afect
consumer behaviour on the Wellandian market, this might
result in the consideration of the Panel that the products are
‘liket. However, as seen in the facts of the case, Wellandianst
buying behaviour is not subject to much change when there
are ethical considerations into play. Hence, it is likely that
these products are found to be like;
– A non-organic unroasted cofee bean from State A does not
receive the same treatment as an organic unroasted cofee
bean from State B, and hence the measure does not apply
immediately and unconditionally. It can thus be concluded
that the measure is in violation of Article I:1.




2

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper rx. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67479 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€6,49  2x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd