100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
FELASA Module 9. Animal Models and Experimental Design €5,53   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

FELASA Module 9. Animal Models and Experimental Design

 4 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Module 9 of the FELASA ABD function course covering Animal Models and Experimental Design.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 8  pagina's

  • 9 mei 2024
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • College aantekeningen
  • Felasa abd
  • Alle colleges
avatar-seller
FELASA Module 9: Animal Models and Experimental Design
 When using an animal model you have to consider whether you have a model of
high fidelity or high discrimination
 In a model where young seagulls are responding to a model that looks like their
mother, they are more likely to respond to a sick with a red spot on it than a
realistic model
 The only clue the animals have that something is their mother is the contrast
between the spot and the white beak/stick and this contrast is higher on the
stick
 The lookalike model is a high fidelity model, whereas the stick is a high
discrimination model
 Most animal models are models of high discrimination
 US NIH defines a model as a living organism in which normative biology or
behaviour can be studied, or in which a spontaneous or induced pathological
process can be investigated, and in which the phenomenon in one or more
respects resembles he same phenomenon in humans or other species of animal
 This means we select one phenomenon in the animal which is comparable to
humans that we want to model
 In spontaneous models this phenomenon occurs spontaneously
 In induced models the phenomenon is induced chemically or surgically
 For example by causing an animal to have type 1 diabetes by removing the
pancreas
 A negative model is where the phenomenon never occurs
 For example if you study why a pig never activates coagulation factor VII
when fed a high fat diet
 An orphan model is where a veterinary patient develops a disease which looks
like a human disease
 E.g. when a cat develops obesity and type 2 diabetes
 Models monitor various parameters
 E.g. blood pressure, blood values and weight
 You need to determine the most important parameter (your primary readout)
 Other parameters are secondary readouts- these are good to use for
mechanistic explanations of changes in your primary readout
 Animal models are used to obtain information about disease and its prevention,
diagnosis and treatment
 They are essential for drug discovery and testing medicine
 Using animal models allows us to perform experiments that would be
impractical or prohibited in humans
 If drugs are tested in a poor model they may not have the same result in humans
 Therefore drugs should be tested in multiple high discrimination models for
different aspects of the disease
 Example of a high fidelity vs high discrimination model in human health
 Chimpanzees have a high fidelity to humans but infecting them with HIV isn’t
useful because they don’t develop signs of infection
 It is better to infect cats, which have a low fidelity to humans because they can
be infected with feline immunodeficiency virus disease (from the same family as
HIV) and they will develop similar symptoms
 External validity (how well a model translates to the species it is modelling) is split
into three criteria

,  Construct validity: The extent both human and the model phenomenon studies
can be explained by the same theory
 E.g. the cause of the disease is the same
 Face validity- the similarity of the appearance of the phenomenon between
animals and humans
 E.g. The symptoms of feline immunodeficiency virus are the same as HIV
 Predictive validity- a measure of how much a drug has the same effect in
humans and animal models
 Rats with their pancreas removed have low construct validity as a diabetes model
as humans don’t develop diabetes from a missing pancreas
 The model has low face validity because the rats will develop extra symptoms
 If you want to test the effect of insulin to alleviate diabetes it has high predictive
validity
 For validation of an animal model it is important to consider the cause and effect
relationship between an intervention and an outcome- this is the internal validity
 Internal validity is dependent on experimental design, randomization, proper
controls and the ability to reproduce research
 Reproducibility crisis- up to half of all studies can’t be replicated
 This includes cherry-picking data, publication bias for positive results and
insufficient reporting of experimental settings
 Using animal models allows us to standardize experimental environments which
decreases variance and increases power
 This reduces group size (reduction in the 3Rs
 High variance means high reproducibility but low power and also more animals
needed
 To reduce variation pathogen free mice have been bred
 These mice have little diversity in gut microbiota
 Gut microbiota can play an important role in rodents
 This means that the breeder the animals are purchased from can influence
results
 In an experiment with uncontrolled variation positive results in a heterogenous
animal are more reproducible and have less type I errors (i.e false positives)
 Negative results in a heterogenous group are more likely to be wrong so more
type II errors should be expected
 Controlling variation helps this- this can be done by performing experiments on
smaller groups of mice from multiple vendors
 The more complex a model is the higher the variability and frequency of
unexpected results
 Test tube experiments have complexities in molecular interactions
 Cell cultures experiments have complexities in how molecules interact inside
and between cells
 Ex vivo experiments have complexities in how cell populations interact in an
organ
 In vivo experiments have all the listed complexities in a diverse population
 There are two types of variability
 Technical variability
 Comes from inaccurate instruments/tools, inexperienced experimenters and
poor planning
 Reduced through better methods, instruments, planning, training and
experience
 Reducing technical variability improves the accuracy of an experiment

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper alexgpegg. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,53. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79223 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,53
  • (0)
  Kopen