100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Apuntes del Segundo Parcial de Pragmática de la Lengua Inglesa €6,99   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Apuntes del Segundo Parcial de Pragmática de la Lengua Inglesa

 28 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Apuntes correspondientes a los temas 3 y 4 de Pragmática, para el segundo parcial. Con ejemplos originales y no copiados de la profesora, cosa que ella exige y busca.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 11  pagina's

  • 21 mei 2024
  • 11
  • 2023/2024
  • College aantekeningen
  • Masusi
  • Las clases correspondientes a la unidad 3 y 4
avatar-seller
UNIT 3: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS

Main Topics

1. Ordinary language philosophy: H.P. Grice
2. Implicature
3. The Cooperative Principle and its maxims of conversation
4. Non-observance of the maxims
5. Final remarks
1. ORDINARY LANGUAGE PHILOSOPHY: H.P. GRICE

Grice worked with Austin at Oxford in the 1940s and 1950s. Ordinary language
philosophers: fathers of pragmatics. They developed works against positivism. Grice never
developed his theory completely, but it is one of the most influential.

Austin: distinction between what speakers say and what they mean (indirectness).

Grice wished to explain how, with shared rules or conventions, language users understand
one another. Bridging the gap between what is expressed and what is implied.

2. IMPLICATURE

Grice: distinction between natural meaning (literal or abstract meaning) and non-natural
meaning (implied or speaker meaning). Implicature is the process of what is said to what is
implied. Two types of implicature:

● Conventional implicature: Generated by the conventional meaning of the words or
expressions used. She is fat but beautiful. Pragmatic presupposition
● Conversational implicature: They are inferred from conversational rules. Not about
something that is said. I have three books. The hearer knows that the speaker does
not have four books.
○ Generalized conversational implicatures: Triggered without the need for a
special context
○ Particularized conversational implicatures: Only triggered in a certain
context.

Grice listed some distinctive properties of conversational implicatures:

- Non-detachability/non-conventionality: a: I love Tom and Penny, they are delightful!.
b: Well, I Penny is delightful, yes. Even if the sentence is rephrased, (Penny is
amazing) the implicature cannot be detached from the utterance.

, - Implicature changes. How much do you make? If the context is changed, the
implicature changes. For example if someone is asking that before getting engaged
- Calculability: We can calculate how to generate an implicature, following some steps
- Cancelability/Defeasibility: Implicatures can be canceled, as they are not said
explicitly. For example, speaker b can say that they don’t dislike Jane, but they
merely do not know her enough.

Inferential meanings may sometimes become:

1. Conventionalized. Accepted way of expressing indirect meaning, for example:

a. Do you think Mark is gay?
b. Is the sky blue? (the answer is obvious, yes)

There are strategies for these expressions. This one is answering a ridiculous question with
another more ridiculous question. This is to show that the answer is self-evident.

a. I have won the lottery!
b. Yes, and I'm Alexander the Great! (I don’t believe a word you say)

This strategy is replying to an interlocutor’s lie with a more exaggerated and ridiculous lie to
show that you are not fooled.

a. Paul is very nice, right?
b. If Paul is nice, then Hell has frozen over (not agreeing with the proposition, no)

This strategy is replying with the formula “If x, then y: not x” to show disagreement

This can go to the point that the indirect meaning becomes ingrained in the grammar of the
language, the indirect meaning coexists or even replaces the direct meaning. This is:

2. Grammaticalization: Going beyond conventionalization because inference is no longer
involved. It cannot be changed. What was an indirect meaning is now a direct meaning:

● you know (manipulative a lil, to explain that they share common ground)
● I mean (adding more info to justify)
● See (to make the hearer agree)




3. THE COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE AND ITS MAXIMS OF CONVERSATION

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ullstudent. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 82265 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,99
  • (0)
  Kopen