Samenvatting

Samenvatting : Ondernemingsfinanciering & Vermogensmarkten TENTAMEN

0 keer verkocht

Instelling
Tilburg University (UVT)

Dit is een samenvatting voor het tentamen van O&V. Deze samenvatting bevat: Corporate Finance, Global edition -> H14 t/m 18, 20 t/m 28, 30 * Hoofdstuk 22 staat er in het grijs bij, aangezien deze geen onderdeel is van de leerstof voor het tentamen 2024 Geschreven in het Engels

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 59 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 9 juni 2024
Aantal pagina's 59
Geschreven in 2023/2024
Type Samenvatting

Volgen

joesvanderstok Lid sinds 1 jaar 88 documenten verkocht

€5,49

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Summary : Corporate Finance (5th edition)

Chapter 14 - Capital Structure in a Perfect Market
14.1 - Equity Versus Debt Financing
Capital structure = the relative proportions of debt, equity, and other securities
that a firm has outstanding

Two ways to finance a firm/project:
Option 1: financing a firm with only equity (= unlevered equity)
Initial investment = $800
Projected cashflow in 1 year: either $1400 (50%) or $900 (50%) -> estimated:
$1150
Risk free interest rate = 5%
Risk premium = 10%
Cost of capital for this project = 15%

NPV = -$800 + $.15 = $200
-> entrepreneur can either complete the project and keep the projected cash flow
or cash out right now and earn $200 (this is because investors are willing to ‘buy’
the project for the discounted projected cash flow: .15 = 1000)
The ’risk’ of equity holders: they get either $1400 or $900 (profit of 40% or -10%)
= 15%

Option 2: financing a firm with debt and equity (= levered equity)
Borrowed amount = $500
Amount owed in one year: $525 (because of 5% risk free interest rate)
Projected cashflow in 1 year: either $1400 (50%) or $900 (50%)
Since debt holders get paid first, projected profit: either $875 (50%) or $375
(50%)
-> by the law of one price, the combined values of debt and equity must be equal
to the NPV of future cash flows (which is still $1000)
So: levered equity = $500
The ’risk’ of equity holders: they get either $875 or $375 (profit of 75% or -25%)
= 25%
-> higher risk but also higher overall return on investment

* Leverage increases the risk of equity even when there is no risk that the firm
will default

14.2 - Modigliani-Miller I: Leverage, Arbitrage, and Firm Value
Perfect capital markets conditions:
1. Investors and firms can trade the same set of securities at competitive market
prices equal to the present value of their future cash flows
2. There are no taxes, transaction costs, or issuance costs associated with
security trading
3. A firm’s financing decisions do not change the cash flows generated by its
investments, nor do they reveal new information about them

MM-proposition 1:
In a perfect capital market, the total value of a firm’s securities is equal to the

, market value of the total cash flows generated by its assets and is not affected
by its choice of capital structure

Homemade leverage = when investors use leverage in their own portfolios to
adjust the leverage choice made by the firm

Market value balance sheet = accounting balance sheet with 2 exceptions:
1. All assets and liabilities of the firm are included, even intangible assets which
are normally excluded from accounting balance sheets
2. All values are current market values rather than historical costs
-> total value of all securities issued by the firm must equal the total value of the
firm’s assets

Market value of equity = Market value of assets – Market value of debt(or
other liabilities)

Leveraged recapitalization = when a firm repurchases a significant
percentage of its outstanding shares by borrowing money

What happens when a firm repurchases own shares by borrowing money?
1. After borrowing, the firm’s liabilities and cash grow by the same amount, no
change to market value of equity
2. When the share repurchase is conducted, debt stays the same but since the
cash is spent, the market value of equity will drop by the same amount as the
cash
3. The share price stays the same; losing the cash would lower the firm’s assets
and share price but since the cash was used repurchase shares, the share price
rises again to the same point where we started

14.3 - Modigliani-Miller II: Leverage, Risk, and the Cost of Capital
MM-proposition 1:
E+D=U=A
E = market value of equity
D = market value of debt
U = market value of equity if the firm is unlevered
A = market value of the firm’s assets

This equality implies the following relationship:
E D
∗R E + ∗R D=RU RE = returns of levered equity
E+ D E +D
RD = returns of debt
RU = returns of unlevered equity

This can be rearranged into:
D
R E=R U + ( RU −R D )RU -> the risk without leverage
E
D
(R −R D ) -> additional risk due to leverage
E U

In the preceding two formulas you can replace R with ꟗ, with ꟗ representing risk

, ꟗU = the unlevered beta -> measures the market risk of the firm’s underlying
assets, and thus can be used to assess the cost of capital for comparable
investments
MM-proposition 2:
The cost of capital of levered equity increases with the firm’s market value debt-
equity ratio

E D
Unlevered cost of capital ( Pretax WACC )= rE + r With perfect capital
E+ D E+ D D
markets, a firm’s WACC is independent of its capital structure and is equal to its
equity cost of capital if it is unlevered, which matches the cost of capital of its
assets

Debt-to-value ratio = D / (E+D)

14.4 - Capital Structure Fallacies
Two incorrect arguments made in favour of leverage:
1. Leverage can increase a firm’s expected earnings per share
-> its true that repurchasing shares with borrowed money can increase EPS but
that happens because the risk also increases because of the leverage. Therefore
its consistent with MM-proposition 1
2. Issuing equity will dilute existing shareholders’ ownership, so debt
financing should be used instead
-> this statement ignores that the cash raised by issuing new shares will increase
the firm’s assets. As long as the firm issues the new shares at fair price, there will
be no loss or gain to the shareholders. Any gain or loss associated with the
transaction will result from the NPV of the investments the firm makes with the
raised funds

14.5 - MM: Beyond the Propositions
Conclusive note:
With perfect capital markets, financial transactions neither add nor destroy value,
but instead represent a repackaging of risk

, Chapter 15 - Debt and Taxes

15.1 - The Interest Tax Deduction
Corporations pay taxes on their profits after interest payments are deducted
-> this means that interest expenses reduce the amount of corporate tax firms
must pay

Example:

With leverage Without leverage
EBIT $2800 $2800
Interest Expense -400 0
Income before tax 2400 2800
Taxes (35%) -840 -980
Net Income $1560 $1820
 Debt holders and equity holders are both financiers of the firm.
Without leverage: only the 1820 net income is available (to equity holders)
With leverage: 1560 net income is available (to equity holders) AND 400 is
available (to debt holders) which amounts to 1960 total

Interest tax shield = the additional amount that a firm would pay in taxes if it
did not have leverage
FORMULA: Interest tax shield = Corporate tax rate * Interest payments

15.2 - Valuing the Interest Tax Shield
In the presence of taxes, MM-proposition I is changed:
The total value of the levered firm exceeds the value of the firm without leverage
due to the present value of the tax savings from debt
FORMULA: Value levered firm = Value unlevered firm + Present Value Interest
Tax Shield

With permanent debt, we can value the interest tax shield as a perpetuity:
τ c∗Interest τ c∗( r f ∗D )
PV ( Interest Tax Shield ) = = =τ c∗D
rf rf

τ c =fir m' s marginal tax rate D=amount of debt r f =risk free interest rate
With tax-deductible interest, the effective after-tax borrowing rate is r *(1 - t c)

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (After Tax):
E D
r wacc = r E+ r (1−τ c ) 15.3 - Recapitalizing to Capture the Tax Shield
E+D E+ D D
When securities are fairly priced, the original shareholders of a firm capture the
full benefit of the interest tax shield from an increase in leverage

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper joesvanderstok. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Samenvatting

Samenvatting : Ondernemingsfinanciering & Vermogensmarkten TENTAMEN

Document informatie

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Verkoper

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud