Samenvatting

International Relations full summary

0 keer verkocht

Instelling
Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)

This summary contains notes from all the lectures the University of Amsterdam gave for its Core module - International relations (CMIR). Description given by the University: International Relations (IR) is a field of study focused on political relations that cross national borders. Most centrall...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 6 van de 58 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 25 juni 2024
Aantal pagina's 58
Geschreven in 2023/2024
Type Samenvatting

international relations
political science
politicologie
theory
approaches
national
international
supranational
development
security
war
peace
economy
international theories
mgo
globalisation
pol
gl
ir

€5,99

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Core module International Relations full notes

EXAM 1:

Lecture 1:

International Relations as:

● Power relations among nation-states in the international system
● As international conflict, war, violence and physical security
● As an international political economy (trade, money, migration, etc.)
● A more complicated cross-border interaction

Ir-specific academic goals: analyse IR as multi-level politics
● Explore theoretical and empirical controversies/debates in IR
○ Categories
■ Descriptive
● Is there more or less globalisation today than ten years ago?
■ Explanatory
● Does economic globalisation increase or decrease the
probability of violent conflict?
■ Normative
● What should foreign economic policies do to discourage violent
conflict?
○ Depth/breadth, topical/mid-level vs perennial
■ Mid-level debates
● Context and problem-specific, partly resolvable through
empirical research
○ How does global climate change affect violent
conflicts?
● Perennial debates
○ All-encompassing, paradigmatic, difficult to solve
through empirics
■ What is the relationship between politics and
economics?
● Articulate a framework for understanding multi level global politics
○ The framework moves beyond the methodological nationalism
○ The framework avoids Western centrism theoretically, methodologically and
normatively
○ The framework recognises equal normative value and agency for all humans
in all corners of the globe
● Build arguments and carry out empirical research to clarify multilevel politics and
address IR controversies

General academic goals: Four skills and a mission
● Argument mapping
○ Conceptually untangle and specify the reasoning, the logical chain of
arguments

, ● Connection-seeing
○ Identify seemingly unrelated connections, even conspiracies but use Occam's
razor
● Empirical testing
○ Carry out empirical research to test, induce or revise theoretical arguments
■ Anecdotes
■ Qualitative cases
■ Descriptive quantitative information
■ Inferential quantitative information
● Courageous curiosity
○ Be open to being wrong, so as to learn
Logistics of CMIR: path to learning IR as multi-level politics

Levels of politics

● Sub-national politics
○ Cities
○ Provinces
● National politics
○ Countries
■ Elections
● International politics
○ Countries
■ Relations with one another
● Regional politics
○ EU
○ Arab League
● Supra-national politics
○ Multinational corporations
○ Transnational terrorist networks

All these levels interplay and are connected
In recent decades, big changes have transformed international relations and hence its study

● Shifting power relations
○ The West vs the rest
○ Decline of the USA
○ Rise of China, India
● Shirting political cleavages
○ Poor vs Rich
○ Globalisation
○ Religion
● More and stronger international institutions
○ EU
○ UN
○ G20
● New actors
○ NGOs

, ○ MNCs
○ Transnational terrorism
● More porous national borders
○ Economic globalisation
○ Contagious politics
○ Policies and practices

,Lecture 2:

Why these and not other debates

● Perennial debates
○ All-encompassing, paradigmatic debates (not mid-level debates) inform IR
thinking on all issues for many decades (centuries)
● Clear focussed debates
○ Some perennial debates are focussed with respect to (mainly) one key
dimension or question about IR, more than just sorting 0 device schools of
thought or conceptual lenses
■ Realism vs liberalism vs constructivism
● Salient debates
○ Some perennial debates are more salient and unresolved than others, some
have been mostly resolved and are now less salient
■ Levels of analysis debate, Waltz: Man the state and war

Realism and Idealism

Idealism Realism

Role of power and Not usually the main or only The most important cause
power-seeking in IR politics cause of shaping shaping motivations and
motivations and outcomes outcomes

Power co-determined by Power is mainly determined
material and non-material by material conditions
conditions (also (geography, guns,
ideas/diplomacy) technology)

Goals of Ir analysis Often normative More positive empirical

To visualise and identify a To reveal what actually
path towards peace, occurs/exists and why
democracy etc.

Marketability/agency Emphasis on Emphasis on political
(maakbaarheid) makeability/agency constraint

Unit of analysis Individuals, groups, nations, Sovereign nation-states and
international organisations the international system

Interests of states Fundamental harmony of Unresolved clashing of
interests interests (zero-sum games)

Conflict avoidable Conflict unavoidable

International order Maintaining international Anarchy, absence of
order due to global supranational authority to
institutions and norms make and enforce decisions

, (norms and institutions not
important

Causes of war Undemocratic government, Natural antagonism
irrational or evil leaders, between states under
nationalism, feudalism, anarchy (striving for
militarism etc. survival/hegemony, where
uncertain power conditions
are dangerous)

Political recommendation Spread the rule of law and Establish stable and
human rights, create IGOs, transparent power
foster democracy, education equilibrium, concentrate on
and consciousness-raising limited vital national
interests

Relationship between Foreign policies are strongly Foreign policies are mainly
domestic and international influenced by domestic shaped by states' position in
politics politics (democratic vs the international system
non-democratic character of (less by domestic factors)
the economy)

Historical torch-bearers Erasmus, Kant, Bentham, Thucydides, Machiavelli,
de Groot, Wilson, Gandhi, Hobbes, Rousseau,
Wendt, Wolfowitz, Von der Churchill, Mearsheimer,
Leyen Waltz, Kissinger, N. Halley

Contemporary realism: the primacy of power

● All realists agree that power and power-seeking are the most important forces in IR
● But they differ over which drivers at which level of analysis underlie such
power-seeking
○ Is it human nature
■ Humans are seen as violent power-seeking animals or social
creatures
● Machiavelli, Niebuhr, Morgenthau, Konrad Lorenz
○ Is it the nation-state
■ Power and its influence are a function of nation-states themselves
■ Sovereignty, but also authoritarian rule, offensive doctrine
● S Walt, S van Evera
○ Is it the international system
■ Anarchy
■ The absence of supranational authority constraints all states in the
international system to rely on self-help for security (through power)
● Thucydides, K Waltz, Mearsheumer, B Posen

, Realism and power-balancing

● Power balancing entails the balancing of the increasing or decreasing power of other
states
○ Realists conceptualise such balancing in varying ways
■ Offensive realism (power maximising)
■ Defensive realism (power balancing)
■ Internal balancing (developing one's army)
■ External balancing (develop alliances with other states)
■ Normative (power balancing should be pursued)
■ Positive (power balancing occurs naturally, almost always)
● Power balancing is universal among states
○ Not just between ideological/economic opponents or rivals, but also between
friends that share norms/institutions/history
■ 20th century France and Britain
○ Not just among old-fashioned Great Powers or militarist nation-stats but also
among more ideologically-oriented, post-realpolitik countries
■ The USSR after 1917, the USA in the 19th century and possibly
American exceptionalism
● Power balancing and security dilemmas
○ Security dilemma: attempts to shore up one’s security can (unintentionally)
undermine the perceived security of others, who then take actions to improve
their security (Herz 1950: Jervis 1977)
■ Power Politics (self-help under anarchy) provokes power balancing,
such that the dilemma emerges
■ Security dilemma is worse with miscalculation, overreaction,
uncertainty offensive-oriented doctrines and military technology
■ Whereby tit-for-tat insecurity spirals can emerge (arms races, war,
etc.)
● Pre-WW1: battleship gap, guns of August outbreak of WW1
● Cold War: bomber gap of the 1950s, missile gap of the 1960s
● Post-Cold War: Sabre-rattling between China-US in the South
China Sea

Realism and War

● War is a natural, almost unavoidable artefact of anarchy, via power balancing and
security dilemma
● But war is particularly likely when power balances are unstable, unclear,
misrepresented or undergoing rapid change (Doran, Waltz, Blainey, Gartzke)

Realism and cooperation

● In international diplomacy, people seek relative gains (not just absolute gains)
○ Relative gains strongly constrain choices
■ The position/status of one’s country is judged relative to the position of
other states, not only or mainly with respect to some ideal position or
one’s past position (Grieco 1988)

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper bjorndekker. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis