Essay
ES2C5 - 1st - Wind Tunnel Lab Report - University of Warwick
- Vak
- Instelling
Lab Report for the Dynamics and Fluid Mechanics Module (ES2C5) as part of the Engineering Course at the University of Warwick which received a 1st (73%).
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
gesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
user2895729
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Wind Tunnel LabThe main aim of this report is to investigate the complexity of fluid flow through 2 experiments.
For pressure distribution, 3 scenarios were investigated: full speed with mesh, full speed without
mesh, and half speed without mesh and the drag coefficient and separation angle was calculated.
When the boundary layer was laminar, Reynold’s number and the separation angle were shown
to be inversely proportional and when the boundary layer was turbulent, they were proportional.
For velocity distribution, 2 scenarios were considered: velocity of 10 𝑚𝑠 !" and 15 𝑚𝑠 !" however
two types of methods, were used to analyze the drag coefficients. In which, Reynold’s number
and the drag coefficient were found to be inversely proportional.
1. Introduction
The distinction between laminar and turbulent flow is an important concept in understanding the
behavior of fluid and fluid mechanics, since they are complex and have many real-life applications,
such as the aerodynamic analysis and shape optimization of a car. The aim of this report is to
investigate laminar and turbulent flow through experiments of pressure and velocity distributions
in relation to Reynold’s number, the drag coefficient, and the angle of separation.
2. Background Information
Figure 2.1 shows the potential flow around a circle, for
Reynold’s number below 5. However, this is not always true.
Take an object in a fluid, at the surface of the object the velocity
of the fluid is zero, this is called the no-slip condition (White,
Figure 2.2 - shows the pressure
2016). Then the boundary layer is defined as the region from Figuredistribu3on
2.1 - showsof poten3al
the streamflow around
pattern
of fluida flow
circleaccording
(White, 2016).
to different
the surface in which the flow velocity increases to the free- Reynold's number (Duranay, et al.,
stream velocity from zero at the wall (White, 2016). 2022).
Reynold’s number is a non-dimensional number that can be
defined as the ratio of inertial forces over shear viscous forces,
#$
𝑅𝑒 = %
where 𝑢 = 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑐 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝐿=
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ and 𝑣 = 𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 (White,
2016). As shown in figure 2.1, the higher the Reynold’s number
the more turbulent the fluid flow because inertial forces are more
prominent than shear viscous forces. From 𝑅 = 9.6, the fluid Figure 2.2 - shows the pressure
distribution of potential flow around a
starts to separate from the surface because the shear forces in circle (White, 2016).
the boundary layer dissipate energy which leads to a loss of energy in the fluid and separation.
In figure 2.2, laminar flow can be explained visually since there is a separation of the fluid and
surface at 80°. Whereas inviscid theory has no separation point. For higher Reynold’s numbers,
the fluid separates earlier due to the increase in shear force leading to more energy dissipating
in the boundary layer. However, from 𝑅 = 500, 000 the boundary layer becomes turbulent which
in effect draws energy in from the free-stream fluid flow which leads to an increased angle of
1
, separation. Which, regarding figure 2.2, explains why the separation angle is 120° and the curve
rises after the minimum then levels off.
The drag coefficient is another non-dimensional number
which can be expressed as the drag force over dynamic
&
force, 𝐶& = ! where 𝐷 = 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑔 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒, 𝜌 = 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦,
'#" (
"
and 𝐴 = 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 (White, 2016). Figure 2.3 shows the
relationship between Reynold’s number and the drag
Figure 2.3 - shows the relationship between the
coefficient. For most values of Reynold’s number, the drag drag coefficient and Reynold’s number (White,
2016).
coefficient decreases as Reynold’s number increases.
In terms of calculations, pressure differences can be calculated using a multitube manometer,
using the equation ∆𝑝 = 𝜌𝑔ℎ (White, 2016). If there is one point where the pressure is known,
then we can calculate the other pressures using the measured height, known density, and
pressure as a comparison. We can increase the sensitivity of a multitube manometer by
increasing the angle of inclination. This is because small pressures will have larger effect along
the inclined length and leads to increased sensitivity and accuracy, ∆𝑝 = 𝜌𝑔𝑙𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃 where 𝑙 =
𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ, 𝑔 = 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 and 𝜃 = 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. Moreover, the Bernoulli’s
'
principle can be used calculate the velocity by pressure differences, 𝑝 + 𝑢) + 𝜌𝑔ℎ = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡
)
where ℎ = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 (White, 2016). We can approximate definite integrals using the Trapezoidal and
Simpson’s rule. Trapezoidal rule uses linear approximations whereas, Simpson’s rule uses
quadratic approximation which makes it more accurate (Thangarajah, 2023). Therefore,
Simpson’s rule is more suited to a smooth function. The number of nodes indicates the points
used in the approximations; therefore, more nodes mean a larger accuracy.
3. Method
There will be 2 experiments conducted: pressure distribution and velocity distribution. For the first
experiment, a cylinder will have holes equally spaced by 15° from 0° till 180° which are attached
to plastic tubes which leads to a multitube manometer. There is also a pitot-static tube in free-
stream velocity to serve as a comparison. This cylinder is placed in a wind tunnel and the pressure
can be calculated. In the second experiment, using a pitot-static probe and moving it vertically to
measure velocity downstream of a cylinder. A micromanometer calculates the velocity using the
pressure difference between the pitot-static probe, static pressure and Bernoulli’s principle.
Figure 3.1 - shows the apparatus set up of the pressure distribution experiment and velocity distribution experiment respectively.
2
Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:
Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews
Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!
In een paar klikken geregeld
Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.
Direct to-the-point
Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper user2895729. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,25. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69988 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen