Essay
Essay Media Culture and Society
This is my media, culture and society essay about the relation between media and society
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 1 van de 2 pagina's
Voorbeeld 1 van de 2 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Media, Culture and Society essayRelation between media and society
The media coverage on immigration issues could affect the Brexit referendum outcome
‘Media painted bleak picture of immigration before Brexit vote, study finds’
(theguardian.com). I read an article that stated this while doing research for our storyboard.
This statement really interested me and inspired me to write about whether the media
coverage on immigration issues, like the refugee crisis, could affect the Brexit referendum
outcome.
King’s College London’s centre for the study of media, communication and power (CMCP)
did research on the media coverage before and during the EU referendum campaign. They
found that the media was dominated by “overwhelmingly negative” coverage of two issues:
the consequences of migration to the UK and economy (theguardian.com). Negative coverage
could have led to more ‘leave the European Union votes’ in the ‘British exit’ referendum,
since the Brexit will make it harder for refugees and immigrants to come to the UK.
I think this outcome is relevant because from a great deal of in-depth qualitative work with
audiences we know that media have a role in helping to shape public understandings
(Kitzinger). I will analyse how media could have affected the outcome of such an important
event as the Brexit referendum with their potential to frame the public opinion and to
reinforce the feeling of nationalism.
Framing the public opinion
Media interest in immigration more than tripled during the 10-week campaign, rising faster
than any other political issue and appearing on 99 front pages, compared with 82 about the
economy, most of these front pages (97) were published by pro-leave newspapers (Moore and
Ramsay, 2017). The issues were described by as “acrimonious and divisive” and specific
nationalities were singled out for particular negative coverage- especially Turks and
Albanians, but also Romanians and Poles (Moore and Ramsay, 2017).
The concept of framing is first described by Goffman in 1974 and this definition is still used:
“Media focusses attention on certain events and then places them within a field of meaning.
The message is presented to the audience in a ‘framed’ way” (Goffman, 1974). The results of
the report show us that the media became more focused on the immigration issues in the run
up to the Brexit referendum. They also focused more on specific groups and this can lead to
stereotyping. Stereotypes are often viewed as false overgeneralizations made by socially
dominant groups about socially oppressed groups (Gorham, 1999). A survey conducted on
behalf of the British Red Cross found that the words people most associate with media
coverage of refugees and asylum seekers are ‘illegal immigrants’ and ‘scroungers’
(theweek.co.uk).
The study infers that the campaign leading up to the EU referendum was the UK’s “most
divisive, hostile, negative and fear-provoking of the 21st century”, and that this was
“encouraged and enflamed by a highly partisan national media”. This statement and the
CMCP stating that messages were described by as “acrimonious and divisive” corresponds to
that sometimes we consciously alter what is said, or the way we say it, in order to maximize
its impact (Kitzinger). This is in line with the messages including for example reiteration of
key phrases and themes making messages more effective (Kitzinger).
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper amstudent. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77254 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen