LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 | Due 16 August 2024. Multiple answers provided.
Critically discuss the decision of Mdlekeza v Gallie 2021 (4) 531 (wcc) with specific reference
to defamation and the claim for damages in that respect. Do not include a discussion of the
Prescription Act. Yo...
LPL4802 October November PORTFOLIO (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED
Alles voor dit studieboek
(46)
Geschreven voor
University of South Africa (Unisa)
Law of Damages (LPL4802)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (80)
1
beoordeling
Door: noxville • 2 maanden geleden
Verkoper
Volgen
Aimark94
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT
Please note that the author of this document will not responsibility for any plagiarizing you
commit.
1. Critically discuss the decision of Mdlekeza v Gallie 2021 (4) 531 (wcc) with specific reference
to defamation and the claim for damages in that respect. Do not include a discussion of the
Prescription Act. Your discussion should include (but not limited to) what constitutes
defamation and how the court dealt with this in case, the two-stage inquiry, mitigating and
aggravating factors. You should include your personal view of the decision in this case and
provide reasons for your view.
Answer 1:
The case of Mdlekeza v Gallie (2021 (4) 531 (WCC)) presents a significant instance of defamation
law in South Africa, particularly in how it relates to claims for damages. The core issue in this case
revolves around whether the statements made by the defendant constituted defamation and, if so,
whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages. This discussion will critically examine the elements of
defamation as applied in this case, the court's approach to the two-stage inquiry, and the factors
considered in determining the appropriate award for damages.
Defamation in South African Law
Defamation in South African law is defined as the unlawful and intentional publication of a
statement that injures the reputation of another person. The essential elements of defamation include
the publication of a defamatory statement, the identification of the plaintiff as the subject of the
statement, and an intent to defame. The court generally adopts a two-stage inquiry to determine
whether a statement is defamatory: first, whether the statement was defamatory in nature, and second,
whether the publication of the statement was unlawful.
The Court’s Approach in Mdlekeza v Gallie
In Mdlekeza v Gallie, the court applied the standard principles of defamation law, focusing on
whether the defendant's statements could reasonably be understood as defamatory. The court first
examined the nature of the statements made by the defendant and considered the context in which
they were made. The statements were found to be defamatory as they were likely to diminish the
esteem in which the plaintiff was held by others.
The two-stage inquiry was applied meticulously by the court. In the first stage, the court evaluated
whether the statements were prima facie defamatory. This involved an objective assessment of
whether the statements would likely harm the plaintiff’s reputation. The court concluded that the
statements in question did indeed meet this criterion.
In the second stage, the court considered whether there were any grounds that could render the
publication lawful, such as truth for the public benefit, fair comment, or privilege. The defendant
failed to establish any such defenses, leading to the conclusion that the publication was unlawful.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Aimark94. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,72. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
