100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Article - Ballien, E. Bollen, K. Euwema., M. & De Witte, H. (2013) - Conflict Management Styles - €2,99
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Article - Ballien, E. Bollen, K. Euwema., M. & De Witte, H. (2013) - Conflict Management Styles -

 31 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Complete description of the article. Definitions worked out and everything well structured and easy to read. Ballien, E. Bollen, K. Euwema., M. & De Witte, H. (2013). Conflicts and conflict management styles as precursors of workplace bullying: a two-wave longitudinal study.

Voorbeeld 1 van de 2  pagina's

  • 26 oktober 2019
  • 2
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (48)
avatar-seller
MariavanRoos
Ballien, E. Bollen, K. Euwema., M. & De Witte, H. (2013). Conflicts and conflict management styles as
precursors of workplace bullying: a two-wave longitudinal study.

Aim of the article
Examining the relationships between conflicts in the work unit, conflict management styles and
bullying (Both targets and perpetrators).

Theory
Workplace bullying = A long term process (Minimum of 6 months) in which minor negative acts
accumulate to a pattern of systematic maltratement, related to work of personal issues, that may
harm the targets health and wellbeing and may affect the tarteget attitude in work behaviour (Job
satisfaction, commitment, intention to leave, absenteeism).
Occurrence of conflicts in work can trigger bullying.
Unresolved and interpersonal conflicts belong to the top five most indicated causes of bullying from
target perspective (Zapf, 1999). The article is focussed on conflicts in the own working unit, because
there is the interdependency the highest.

T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2
Hypothesis 1a: The occurrence of conflicts in the work unit at T1 relates positively to being a target of
bullying behaviour at T2.
Hypothesis 1b: The occurrence of conflicts in the work unit at T1 relates positively to being a
perpetrator(NL: dader) of bullying behaviours at T2.

Some findings already showed that bullying is also triggered by the way conflicts are managed by the
employees involved. Also some studies found that productive reactions to conflicts related to a
decrease in bullying, while destructive reactions to conflicts encouraged bullying.

Solving = Reflecting an attention for one’s own well as well as for the opposite party, open
negotiating in order to create a win-win situation. Using a more integrative style, like problem solving
resulted in lower tasks conflict, reduced relationship conflict and reduced conflict stress.

Hypothesis 2a: Problem solving at T1 relates negatively to being a target of bullying behaviours at T2.
Hypothesis 2b: Problem solving at T1 relates negatively to being a perpetrator of bullying
behaviours at T2.

Forcing contributes to tensed relations and encourages conflict escalation in the long term. This style
is rather used by “Powerful” employees. Because the other party feels vulnerable.

Hypothesis 3a: Forcing at T1 relates negatively to being a target of workplace bullying behaviours at
T2.
Hypothesis 3b: Forcing at T1 relates positively to being a perpetrator of workplace bullying
behaviours at T2.

Also low-assertive conflict management styles (Yielding, Avoiding) could perhaps relate to being a
target of bullying. Some studies says that this will escalate on the long term, some not. Because the
opinions are divers, we will not do anything with the low-assertive conflict management styles.

Results
Conflicts are definitely related to bullying. Problem solving is negatively related to being a target and
perpetrator of bullying behaviour. Forcing was associated positive with being a perpetrator of
bullying behaviour, BUT NOT to being a target of bullying. Avoiding and yielding are not related.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper MariavanRoos. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56473 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,99
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd