100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers. €11,28   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers.

 8 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • PSCI 1100
  • Instelling
  • PSCI 1100

PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions With Correct Answers. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) - answer-How did court rule? rules that Congress has the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland couldn't tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers -B...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 8  pagina's

  • 29 augustus 2024
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • PSCI 1100
  • PSCI 1100
avatar-seller
©THEBRIGHT EXAM STUDY SOLUTIONS 8/22/2024 12:54 PM



PSCI 1100 Midterm Exam Questions
With Correct Answers.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) - answer✔✔-How did court rule?
rules that Congress has the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland couldn't tax
instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers
-Broader significance
Court rules that congress has implied powers because of necessary and proper clause.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Regulation of steamboat operators involves interstate commerce and is therefore reserved to
Congress under the Commerce Clause. National government has sole control over interstate
commerce, which means state laws become invalid in the face of national law.
-Broader significance
Expands power of congress and promotes federal supremacy

Wickard v. Filburn (1942) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Court finds that Commerce Clause gives Congress power to regulate prices, and the law in
question relates to this power
-Broader significance
Commerce clause

Engel v. Vitale (1962) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Holds that state cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if it is voluntary and non-
denominational
-Broader significance
Violates the establishment clause, breaches the constitutional wall of separation between church
and state. Shows that court protects the rights of minorities even when it is unpopular to do so
(countermajoritarian)

, ©THEBRIGHT EXAM STUDY SOLUTIONS 8/22/2024 12:54 PM

Texas v. Johnson (1989) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Court rules that TX law banning burning of flag is constitutional, and that flag burning is
protected speech. TX doesn't have a compelling state interest.
-Broader significance
Holds that speech can include actions and non-verbal messages. 1st amendment protects
individual when their message/opinion is disliked by society.

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Rules in favor of Griswold (Planned Parenthood) because the Constitution has penumbras,
especially a right to privacy
-Broader significance
Transforms landscape regarding whether states can ban birth control pills, precursor to Roe v.
Wade. Establishes a constitutional right to privacy, which will be used in Roe and Casey.

Roe v. Wade (1973) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
SCOTUS rules that there is a constitutional right to abortion, invalidates many pre-existing state
laws.
-Broader significance
Grounds right to abortion in 14th amendment, but also 9th amendment. Although women can
get abortions, state also has compelling interest in protecting fetus, so establishes a trimester
framework with exceptions for women's health.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
Upholds most of the PA provisions, but established an undue burden test, defined as a
"substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains
viability"
-Broader significance
Reaffirms Roe, even with a more conservative court.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) - answer✔✔-How did the court rule?
No constitutional right to abortion, overrules Roe and Casey
-Broader significance
Shows how government is becoming increasingly more conservative, republican state majorities
and conservative SCOTUS. Ignores stare decisis by overturning legal precedent.

Missouri Compromise of 1820 - answer✔✔-Strictly political situation

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Thebright. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €11,28. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67096 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€11,28
  • (0)
  Kopen