Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

LLW2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due 13 September 2024

2 keer verkocht

Vak
Individual Labour Law (LLW2601)

Instelling
University Of South Africa (Unisa)

Boek
Labour Law Rules 4th Edition

LLW2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due 13 September 2024. Multiple Answers Provided. Read the following scenario before answer the question Vatiswa works for Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). TTP employs people whose services it avails to its own clients in exchange for an agreed fixed...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 5 september 2024
Aantal pagina's 7
Geschreven in 2024/2025
Type Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat Vragen en antwoorden

llw2601 assignment 2 semester 2 2024

Titel boek:Labour Law Rules 4th Edition

Auteur(s):Adriette Dekker et al Marie Mcgregor

Uitgave:Onbekend
ISBN:9781928309338
Druk:Onbekend

Instelling
University of South Africa (Unisa)
Vak
Individual Labour Law (LLW2601)

Volgen

Aimark94

Lid sinds 5 jaar 4938 documenten verkocht

168

€2,68

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Please note that the author of this document will not responsibility for any plagiarizing you
commit.

Read the following scenario before answer the question

Vatiswa works for Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). TTP employs people whose services it
avails to its own clients in exchange for an agreed fixed amount. Vatiswa receives her salary payments
from TTP and TTP is responsible for paying her UIF contributions and deducting her employee taxes.
For the last six months, Vatiswa has worked as a filing clerk on behalf of her TTP’s client,
McDonald-Kentucky Corporation (MKC), in Mthatha. Recently, Vatiswa discovered that she earns
less money than other filing clerks directly employed by MKC and did not receive an annual bonus
which the MKC employees were entitled to despite doing the same work as them. Vatiswa decides to
use a Large language model (so-called “Al” model) in order to obtain legal advice for her legal
predicament.

Below is the answer provided by the ChatGPT AI:

Vatiswa's situation raises several important legal considerations under South African labor law,
particularly concerning the principle of equal pay for equal work and the nature of her employment
through Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP).

1. Equal Pay for Equal Work: Vatiswa has discovered that she earns less money than other filing
clerks directly employed by McDonald-Kentucky Corporation (MKC), despite performing the same
duties. This situation potentially violates the principle of equal pay for equal work as enshrined in
South African labor laws, particularly in terms of the Employment Equity Act, No. 55 of 1998. This
act prohibits unfair discrimination, including unfair discrimination in terms of remuneration.

2. Legal Nature of Employment (TTP's Role): Vatiswa is employed by TTP, not directly by MKC.
TTP assigns her to work for MKC under what seems to be a form of labor broking or temporary
employment service arrangement. In such arrangements, TTP remains her legal employer, responsible
for paying her salary, deducting taxes, and ensuring compliance with UIF contributions. However, this
does not absolve MKC from its responsibilities regarding fair treatment and equal pay.

3. Remedies and Legal Consequences: Equal Pay Claim: Vatiswa may have grounds to lodge a claim
against MKC for equal pay for equal work. Despite being employed by TTP, MKC cannot unfairly
discriminate against her in terms of her remuneration compared to its own employees doing the same
work.

 Breach of Rights: If Vatiswa's terms of employment with TTP do not explicitly waive her rights to
equal pay compared to MKC employees, then MKC may be in breach of her rights under the law.
 Legal Action: Vatiswa could potentially pursue a claim through the Commission for Conciliation,
Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) or the Labour Court for unfair discrimination and/or unpaid
bonuses, seeking compensation or rectification of the discriminatory practices.

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Aimark94. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,68. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67418 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

LLW2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due 13 September 2024

Document informatie

Onderwerpen

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Verkoper

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud