State V. Perkins
"Fighting Words" not protected. Officers need to have a thicker skin!
Houston V. Hill
Cannot interfere with Police Officer's duties.
Previous
Play
Next
Rewind 10 seconds
Move forward 10 seconds
Unmute
--
/
--
Full screen
Brainpower
Read More
State V. B...
SCCJA Unit 2 Court Cases
with complete solutions
State V. Perkins - answer "Fighting Words" not protected. Officers
need to have a thicker skin!
Houston V. Hill - answer Cannot interfere with Police Officer's duties.
State V. Bailey - answer People can curse at Police but cannot be
loud and boisterous in a public place.
City of Bismark V. Nassif - answer A Threat is something that can be
reasonably acted upon. Defendant was arrested for DC.
State V. Messervy - answer Security Officers can prosecute
misdemeanor cases in summary court that occurred within the
boundaries they patrol.
State V. Sossamon - answer Officer's must prosecute their own
cases. They cannot pass off the cases to officer's that are better at
present a case.
City of Easley V. Cartee - answer License security officers have been
granted by legislation the authority and power of sheriffs to arrest
any person violating the criminal statutes of the state.
Katz V. US - answer Get a warrant if you want to search legally. Also
defendant has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
, Riley V. California; US V. Wurie - answer Need search warrant to
search cell phones.
State V. Peters - answer Exceptions to the warrant requirement,
Search incident to arrest, Hot Pursuit, Stop & Frisk, Automobile
Exception, Plain View Doctrine and Consent.
US V. Fisher - answer If officer lies on Affidavit and the case is based
on that false PC. The defendants Due Process was violated.
State V. McKnight - answer Sworn Oral testimony is not enough,
Must have a written Affidavit.
Johnson V. US - answer Determination of PC must be made by a
Neutral, Detached Magistrate.
Maryland V. Garrison - answer If a search warrant is obtained and
describes a specific area and upon arrival that area is unknowingly
split up into two areas. The evidence found within the second area
does not require suppression.
Richards V. Wisconsin - answer When officers originally requested a
"No knock" warrant, but the Judge issues a "Knock and Announce"
warrant. The officers on scene can still make a judgement call and
still use a "No Knock" approach.
US V. Ramirez - answer With Search warrant in hand, the officers
can use Trickery or Deception to gain entrance into the residence.
"Pizza delivery"!
State V. Valentine - answer The suspect right to privacy is minimal
when police have the warrant and they have no right to refuse entry
to police, only a right to submit voluntarily.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper BRAINBOOSTERS. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €13,23. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
