LEB 320F Ethics Test with Complete Solutions Graded A+
3 keer bekeken 0 keer verkocht
Vak
LEB 320F Ethics
Instelling
LEB 320F Ethics
LEB 320F Ethics Test with Complete Solutions Graded A+
cognitive dissonance - Answer-- Avoid uncomfortable psychological inconsistency
- Difficult to process contradictory information
- Will cognitively screen information and tend to reject that which undermines their decisions or contradicts ...
LEB 320F Ethics Test with
Complete Solutions
Graded A+
cognitive dissonance - Answer-- Avoid uncomfortable psychological inconsistency
- Difficult to process contradictory information
- Will cognitively screen information and tend to reject that which undermines their
decisions or contradicts their positions
- Ex. ignorant debates
self-serving bias - Answer-- Potentially most influential
- Gather, process, and remember information that advances self-interest and supports
pre-existing views
- Search out information that supports perspective and conclusion you are trying to
prove
- Confirmation bias - ignore evidence that contradicts conclusion
- Belief persistence - hold belief long after basis has been discredited
- Casual attribution theory - attribute more than average credit to yourself
- The more subjective the judgment and the less certain the facts, the more influential
the self-serving bias is
time-delay trap - Answer-- Short term consequences easier for people to consider
Inability to defer gratification
- temporal equivalent of moral distance
- time proximity
tangible and abstract - Answer-- Decision making more impacted by the tangible than
by removed
- Moral distance - farther away from impact, easier to make the decision
sunk cost - Answer-- Escalation of commitment; difficulty cutting cord or scrapping
- Ex. relationships
loss aversion - Answer-- Endowment effect - attach ourselves to things and then value
them higher than we would've originally valued them before we identified; sentimental
value; ex. first car
- Detest loss twice as much than enjoy gains
, - Loss aversion interacts with framing to create a volatile mix - even in the absence of a
direct economic incentive, people are more wiling to manage earnings when to do so
would avoid reporting a loss (aka managers more likely to commit fraud if they think
stock price will decline rather than if they think it will get them ahead of competitors)
time pressure - Answer-more pressure, more likely to make ethical missteps
money - Answer-thinking about money weakens social relationships, which is what
morality is rooted in
fundamental attribution error - Answer-- underestimate how situational factors affect
others' decisions and overestimate how much they affect our own
- other = character, you = situational/circumstances
self-model - Answer-- Make decision regarding own responsibility in addition to the
"right" thing
- Judgement arises from a person's moral identity
- Human tendency to strive for self-consistency
rationalization strategies - Answer-• Denial of responsibility - have no other choice
• Denial of injury - claim no one was harmed
• Denial of victim - deserved what happened
• Social weighting - condemn the condemner and use selective social comparison
• Appeal to higher loyalties
• Metaphor of the ledger - entitled to indulge in deviant behavior because of accrued
credits in their jobs
pre-scripting - Answer-envision ethical problems in advance and anticipate your
reaction; think in advance
socialize newcomers into corrupt environments by - Answer-o Co-optation - rewards to
induce change
o Compromise - backed into corruption in an attempt to resolve a pressing problem
o Incrementalism - gradually introduced
SRI - Answer-• Socially responsible investing
corporation as a moral agent - Answer-- Group dynamics - safety in numbers; people
act differently in a group than individually
Actions motivated by corporate rather than personal purposes
- No single person really feels responsible - formal lines of accountability and authority
are fuzzy
- Lack of communication between branches
- Since responsibility is dispersed, counteract by imposing moral responsibility on firm
o Corporate social responsibility - is this appropriate or an obligation? Regardless of
whether it pays
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Scholarsstudyguide. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €10,90. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
