Overig
AQA Psychology Paper 1 Essay Plans
- Vak
- Instelling
Paper 1 Essay plans for AQA Pscyh - definitions/terminolgy is MARK SCHEME BASED
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
gesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
keirafm1
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
SOCIAL INFLUENCETypes of conformity AO1:
COMPLIANCE - the most superficial level of conformity
- they change their views/actions to fit in with the
reference group.
- doesn’t result in a change in the person’s underlying
attitude,only in the views and behaviours they
express in public.
INTERNALISATION - the deepest level of conformity.
- a person genuinely accepts group norms and
displays the same attitude both publicly and
privately through opinions and behaviours.
IDENTIFICATION
- when someone conforms to the opinions/behaviour
of a group because there is something about the
group which they value.
- a public change to accepting the group's norm even
though their private attitudes may differ.
Explanations for conformity:
Informational social influence - (cognitive)
- occurs when an individual accepts information from
others as evidence about reality
- most likely to happen when a person is in a
new,ambiguous situation,they may observe the
behaviours of others who have more experiences
than them and adopt these behaviours.
- leads to internalisation.
Normative social influence - (emotional)
- an individual conforms with the expectations of the
majority in order to gain approval and avoid
rejection/social disapproval.
- leads to compliance.
AO3:
Research support for ISI
- Lucas et al (2006)
- Greater conformity when the maths task was harder
and when the students rated their mathematical
skills low
- Shows that conformity is reliant on what is viewed
as right
- Experimental reductionism
, Individual differences for NSI
- McGhee and Teevan (1967)
- Some are nAffiliators who have a need for social
recognition
- They are more likely to conform
- Not all people appease societal norms
- Socially sensitive research may make others feels
conscious of their conformity
Research support for ISI
- Asch (1951)
- Conformity rates fell to 12.5% when ppts were
asked to write down answers instead of saying them
- When interviewer, ppts were afraid of disapproval
from the group
- Experimental reductionism
Asch and conformity AO1:
- 75% of the participants
conformed on at least
one critical trial
- 25% never conformed
- 36.8% gave the wrong
answer
- Group Size = increased
to 31.8%
- Unamity = reduced by a 1/4
- Task Difficulty = increased
AO3:
Research support for Asch
- Lucas et al (2006)
- Greater conformity when the maths task was harder
and when the students rated their mathematical
skills low
- Shows that conformity is reliant on what is viewed
as right
- Experimental reductionism
Artificial task and situation
- Fiske (2014)
- Ppts did not resemble a real life group, nor realistic
situation
- Trivial tasks may lead to demand characteristics
- Findings cannot generalise to everyday scenarios,
low external validity
- Experimental reductionism
Limited applications
, - Bond and Smith (1996)
- Conformity is higher in collectivist cultures as they
are oriented to group needs
- Only 123 american men in the study
- Ethnocentric findings applicable to western culture
Zimbardo and conformity AO1:
with social roles - Participant observation and controlled
observation
- 24 male students were randomly assigned roles of
prisoner/guard
- Unexpected arrest, uniforms and ID
- All ppts conformed to their roles
- 1 prisoner released on the 1st day and 2 on the 4th
- Zimbardo took the role of superintendent
- Planned duration of 2 weeks, stopped after 6 days
AO3:
Ethical issues
- Psychological harm done to some ppts who had to
leave in the early days of the experiment
- Zimbardo became the superintendent where he
conformed to that role instead of focussing on the
experiment
- Experiment did not last the 2 weeks
- HOWEVER, you could leave at any time
- 100% of participants said they would do it again
High internal control
- roles were randomly assigned to avoid researcher
bias
- ppts interviewed beforehand to ensure emotional
stability
- Reduced reasonings of different personalities and
chance to explain confirmation to social roles
- High internal validity
- Experimentally reductionist as it was conducted in a
university which could have led to demand
characteristics
Unrealistic
- Banuazizi and Mohavedi
- Guard based his character off of a film called Cool
Hand Luke
- Not real conformation to social roles due to
stereotypes used
- HOWEVER, 90% of conversations were about
prison life
- Prisoner 416 expressed his theory that the prison
was real but run by psychologists
- High internal validity
, Milgram and obedience AO1:
- 40 male participants
- 84% were glad they participated
- 65% of ppts went to the highest voltage of 450V
- Many showed signs of anxiety and stress - 3 having
seizures
- 12.5% stopped at 300V
- All ppts debriefed
AO3:
Research support
- Sherridan and King
- 54% of males and 100% of females went to the
‘lethal shock’ to a puppy
- Supports the findings of Milgram’s baseline study
and his prediction for behaviour
- Alpha bias could be argue as the differences
between males and female are exaggerated
- Could lead to claims that women are more obedient
Research support
- Le Jeu de la Mort game show replicated Milgram
- Ppts had to give fake shocks to the presenter in
front of an audience
- 80% when to the maximum shock of 460V
- HOWEVER, ppts were paid to do this therefore this
could be skewed the findings due to monetary gain
- Experimental reductionism
Low internal validity
- Orne and Holland argue ppts only obeyed since they
knew the shocks were not real
- Gina Perry found many ppts doubted that the
shocks were real by listening to audio recordings
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper keirafm1. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75759 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen