Samenvatting
Summary IPC Walther
Hierin heb ik het artikel van Walther samengevat! Voor verdere verdieping, verwijs ik naar mijn document waarin ik Hargie heb samengevat :) Ik heb een 8.5 gehaald voor dit vak, successsss <3
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Social presence theory: the degree of awareness of the other person in the interaction Increasedsocial presence → more social influence
Limited social presence Abundant social presence
text audio f2f
few possibilities for social influence many possibilities for social influence
Media (information) richness theory: media differ in the possibility to: convey multiple cues (body
language, vocal, touch), facilitate feedback (co-temporality, simultaneity), exchange of socio-
emotional cues, use of ‘natural language’.
→ complexity of message is determined by
- Uncertainty: the lack of (shared) information
- Equivocality: the complexity of the assignment – no clear ‘best’ outcome (ambiguity)
- Degree of routine: the (shared) experience with the task/ message
Reduced social cues approach:
→ what happens if the sender and receiver miss all kinds of social information about each other?
Consequences on two levels
- Level 1 Lack of knowledge about who someone is: cues to identity (age, gender, ethnicity
etc.), static cues (clothing, location, physical appearance), dynamic cues (body language,
facial expression, voice use)
- Level 2 Lack of awareness that someone is someone: de-individuation (reduced awareness
of others and self)
→ consequences of anonymity/ de-individuation
- More attention to the task (less attention to social issues)
- More equal participation (less attention to status)
- Less process loss during brainstorming (by being able to provide input at the same time)
- The online disinhibition effect: in (anonymous) online environment people appear to be less
restrained and express themselves more freely than f2f
Benign inhibition: more self-disclosure (share emotions, fears, wishes). Unusual acts of
kindness and generosity
Toxic inhibition: Online flaming, trolling, cyberbullying, rude language, harsh critic
Social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE): explains the consequences of de-
individuation in CMC using social psychological theories: social identity theory and self-
categorization theory
- Social identity: ‘that part of individual’s self-concept which derives from his knowledge of his
membership of a social group(s) together with the value and emotional significance
attached to that membership’ Tajfel
- De-individuation: to be submerged in the group → loss of individuality
→ causes reduced self-awareness, reduced feelings of accountability, but also increases
awareness of the social group
We can think about ourselves and others as unique individuals or in generic category terms
→ with these categories we form generic expectancies (stereotypes)
- We overestimate the similarities of member within the group, and of differences of
members between the group
, - Context (a.o. Media constraints!) determines which category becomes salient, and whether
we focus on someone as unique individual or reduce them to category member with
stereotypical characteristics (de-individuation)
- Anonymous/ de-individuated people behave more according to activated norms
→ i.e norms that are salient in the situation, that are related to the activated social
category/ identity.
- Goes against idea that de-individuation automatically leads to anti-normative/ asocial
behavior
What are the effects of anonymity (within CMC) and what is the role of social identity?
- Types of cues: cues to Personal Identity CtPI (individual information, idiosyncratic
information), cues to Social Identity CtSI (social group membership, social categorization
SIDE: de-individuation in CMC
- Under conditions of relative anonymity (medium in which social cues are absent) there will
be a shift from personal to social identity
→ less attention to you and the other as individuals (unique characteristics)
→ more attention to social identity: membership of an (activated) higher order social
category)
- Resulting in: more category-stereotype consistent behavior, → favoritism and more positive
evaluation of ‘ingroupers’ vs. ‘outgroupers, →more flaming in polarized online discussion
Critique on these early technologically deterministic approach to CMC effects:
- CMC is a container term that does not fit current media landscape
- Technological determinism:
→ characteristics of the medium → fixed effects on: success of interaction, interpersonal/
social relationships and behavior
→ CMC (vs f2f) is mostly defined as less suitable for social interactions: what about online
forums (Facebook, Insta)
→ no attention to ‘human determinism’: interpersonal differences, adaptive capacity of the
human being, power of the users, social context of the interactions.
What is CMC today?
- CMC is container term → currently a huge variety in CMC media
- Comparison with FTF does not always make sense → some media are close to f2f
(facetime), some media have more affordances than f2f (social media landscape, virtual
environments)
Media affordances (possibilities):
- Copresence: A and B are present in the room
- Visibility: A and B are visible to each other
- Audibility: A and B can hear each other
- Contemporality/ synchronicity: A and B are part of the interaction at the same time
- Simultaneity: A and B can both send and receive at the same time
- Sequentially: There is an uninterrupted sequence of tun of speakers between A and B (start
to end of conversation)
- Reviewability: A and B can ‘consume’ the messages again
- Revisability: A and B can review or adapt messages before they are ‘send’
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper lauratol. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,16. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 72042 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen