100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
Eerder door jou gezocht
GMAT Practice Questions Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 150 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor€20,26
In winkelwagen
GMAT Practice Questions Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 150 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor
4 keer bekeken 0 keer verkocht
Vak
GMAT Practice
Instelling
GMAT Practice
GMAT Practice Questions Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 150 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor
GMAT Practice Questions Latest Update 2024-
2025 Actual Exam from Credible Sources with
150 Questions and Verified Correct Answers
Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by
Professor
Consider a sample with data values of 10, 20 12, 17, and 16 . Compute the -score for
each of the five observations (to decimals). Enter negative values as negative numbers.
- CORRECT ANSWER: Step-by-step explanation:
z-score is denoted by: 1
here,
: mean
: standard deviation (or the square root of the variance)
so first we need to find the means of our sample:
Now to find the standard deviation we first need to find the variance of the sample. The
variance is the sum of the squares of the differences of each value from the mean.
the standard derviation is simply the square root of the variance!
Now that we all the values for our z-score formula. we can plug it in!
Finally we'll use each value in place of x from our sample into the formula to find the z-
score of each value.
,We can even display the z-scores in a table: (the x-values are in ascending order)
The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is a standardized exam used by
many universities as part of the assessment for admission to graduate study in
business. The average GMAT score is (Magoosh website). Assume that GMAT scores
are bell-shaped with a standard deviation of . Use the empirical rule to answer the
following.
b. What percentage of GMAT scores are or higher (to decimal)? - CORRECT ANSWER:
747 is 2σ above the mean. This means that we go from here above:
2.35+0.15 = 2.5%
The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is a standardized exam used by
many universities as part of the assessment for admission to graduate study in
business. The average GMAT score is (Magoosh website). Assume that GMAT scores
are bell-shaped with a standard deviation of . Use the empirical rule to answer the
following.
c. What percentage of GMAT scores are between and (to decimal)? - CORRECT
ANSWER: 447 is 1σ below the mean and 547 is the mean. This means that we have
34%.
The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is a standardized exam used by
many universities as part of the assessment for admission to graduate study in
business. The average GMAT score is (Magoosh website). Assume that GMAT scores
are bell-shaped with a standard deviation of . Use the empirical rule to answer the
following.
d. What percentage of GMAT scores are between and (to decimal)? - CORRECT
ANSWER: 347 is 2σ below the mean and 647 is 1 above the mean. This means we go
from:
13.5+34+34 = 81.5%
,The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is a standardized exam used by
many universities as part of the assessment for admission to graduate study in
business. The average GMAT score is (Magoosh website). Assume that GMAT scores
are bell-shaped with a standard deviation of . Use the empirical rule to answer the
following.
What percentage of GMAT scores are or higher (to decimal)? - CORRECT ANSWER:
Using the empirical rule, we know that 68% of data falls within one standard deviation of
the mean; 95% of data falls within two standard deviations of the mean; and 99.7% of
data falls within 3 standard deviations of the mean.
This means from the mean to 1 standard deviation (σ) above is 34% of data; from the
mean to 1 σ below is 34% of data; from 1 σ to 2σ above is 13.5% of data; from 1σ to 2σ
below is 13.5% of data; from 2σ to 3σ above is 2.35% of data; from 2σ to 3σ below is
2.35% of data; more than 3σ above is 0.15% of data; and more than 3σ below is 0.15%
of data.
647 is 1 σ above the mean. This means that we go from here above;
13.5+2.35+0.15 = 16%
There is a severe shortage of critical care doctors and nurses to provide intensive-care
services in hospitals. To offset this shortage, many hospitals, such as Emory Hospital in
Atlanta, are using electronic intensive-care units (eICUs) to help provide this care to
patients (Emory University News Center). eICUs use electronic monitoring tools and
two-way communication through video and audio so that a centralized staff of specially
trained doctors and nurses - who can be located as far away as Australia - can provide
critical care services to patients located in remote hospitals without fully staffed ICUs.
One of the most important metrics tracked by these eICUs is the time that a patient
must wait for the first video interaction between the patient and the eICU staff. Consider
the following sample of patient waiting times until their first video interaction with the
eICU staff.
a. Compute the mean waiting time for - CORRECT ANSWER: (a) 43.83
(b) 43
(c) 42
, (d) Q1 41
Q3 46
Using the number of funds as weights, compute the weighted average total return for
these mutual funds. (to 2 decimals)
b. Is there any difficulty associated with using the "number of funds" as the weights in
computing the weighted average total return in part (a)? Discuss. What else might be
used for weights?
(i) Using "number of funds" as weights will only be a good approximation if the amount
invested in various funds is approximately equal. The amount invested in each fund
could be used for weights.
(ii) Using "number of funds" as weights results in a good approximation regardless of
the amount invested in various funds. There is no need to use a different weight.
(iii) Using "number of funds" as weights will only be a good approximation if the amount
invested in various funds is approximately equal. There is no other option that could be
used for weights.
(iv) Using "number of funds" as weights results in a good - CORRECT ANSWER: A)
weighted average :
Σa.b /Σa = (9191 * 4.65) + (2621 * 18.15) + (1419 * 11.36) + (2900 * 6.75) / (9191 +
2612 + 1419 + 2900)
= 126004.
= 7.8156643
B) Using the number of funds as weight poses a difficulty as it considers the cost of
funds rater than it's value. Hence, the higher the cost, the higher the return. Value of
funds would have been a better weight parameter.
(i) Using "number of funds" as weights will only be a good approximation if the amount
invested in various funds is approximately equal. The amount invested in each fund
could be used for weights.
c. Suppose you had invested $10,000 in mutual funds at the beginning of 2007 and
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Tutordiligent. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €20,26. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
