100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Lectures History of Philosophy II €3,99   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Lectures History of Philosophy II

 104 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht

All lectures, History of Philosophy II, Minor Philosophy, University of Groningen

Voorbeeld 3 van de 18  pagina's

  • 18 januari 2020
  • 18
  • 2018/2019
  • College aantekeningen
  • Onbekend
  • Alle colleges
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)
avatar-seller
marijev
History of Philosophy II – 19th and 20th century
Week I – Enlightenment – Light (and shadow) of Reason
General introduction + Kant

Topic of this course:
19th and 20th century philosophy: “Continental Philosophy”

Approach in this course:
‫ ﮲‬History of philosophy
‫ ﮲‬Close reading
‫ ﮲‬General Survey
‫ ﮲‬Hermeneutics

Hermeneutics: exchange of minds, dialogue. The text has a story and the interpretation another
one. Sometimes abused: politics.

9 courses, 9 authors and 14 texts to study for the exam.

Every week: submit your three questions which will determine 20% of the final grade of this
course. SUNDAYS AT 18:00
One comprehension question, one critical question and one short statement. Not
necessary, but a suggestion.

Enlightenment: intro to Immanuel Kant
Literature: Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment (1784)
Critique of Pure Reason (Preface to the Second Edition) (1787)

Kant is one of the most important philosophers of ‘modern’ times. He has written texts on all kinds
of topics: political, anthropological, etc.

Continental Philosophy
Continental vs. analytical.

Continental Philosophy
‫ ﮲‬No methodological unity
‫ ﮲‬No national or linguistic unity
‫ ﮲‬No topical unity

Analytical Philosophy
‫ ﮲‬SEE POWERPOINT

Analytic Philosophy The other of analytical philosophy
Argument rhetoric

Historical Approach
‫ ﮲‬History is always connected implicitly as well as explicitly with the present
‫ ﮲‬Authors, texts and problems are selected due to their importance for current issues inside
and outside philosophy
‫ ﮲‬We cannot avoid dealing with the canon, either in accepting it or rejecting it
‫ ﮲‬Context / hermeneutics

,Immanuel Kant (1)
Kant reacted to the theories of Hume.
Combine necessity of science, react to Hume: laws of nature, they are necessary. The laws always
function. Necessity & the moral law within. Freedom is the most important topic of enlightenment.
For Kant we are citizens of two worlds: world of nature and the world of human beings. God exists
according to Kant. No basis of religion needed to prove that we are free, God exists, but he is not
necessary for freedom.

Freedom
Ignorance and fanaticism were common in this times (end of 18th century).

‫﮲‬ French Revolution in 1789.
‫﮲‬ Enlightened Absolutism.
o Frederic the Great (1712-1786). Make the basic educational system available for
everyone. Idea of enlightenment to get to freedom.
‫﮲‬ Lisbon earthquake in 1755.
o Philosophers reacted to this natural catastrophe, because it made people think
about the progress in science, which made us strong, but we still can’t do anything
about nature.

Immanuel Kant (2)
His parents were pietists, which is Protestantism where the duty and feelings are more important
than the actual Bible/Christian belief. Kant was more interested in science than in philosophy. He
wanted to understand people like Newton.

There are three questions in which all interest of reason(speculative and practical) is united
1. What can I know?
2. What should I do?
3. What may I hope?

4. What is human being?
Not really question 4, because it is a combination of the three questions above: what can I know
as a human being? What should I do as a human being? What may I hope as a human being?

What can I know What should I do?
Fundamental laws of nature Fundamental principle of morality
Necessity Freedom to choose in accordance with the Moral Laws
Universality

Conflict between:
Necessity of nature vs. freedom of human being

We are free not to accept the universal laws of morality.

Critique of Pure Reason
Transcendental idealism

Fundamental laws of nature
Fundamental principle of morality

Prove the validity and the limits of an a priori knowledge.
In order to do things like art, you need limits. Drawing is limited by the size of the paper. Or you
have to finish something before a certain deadline.

, The idea of limits is connected with creating something. We are not immortal so we always have
at least one limit, namely the limit of time before we die.

What is freedom without limits? = an important question.
Definition: comes from ‘finish’. So definition of ‘table’ is explained by the limits of the table.

In Kant’s theory the limits are literal: what can I know?

How do we know something is true?
Critique of
‫ ﮲‬Skepticism
‫ ﮲‬Dogmatism
‫ ﮲‬Indifferentism

Skepticism
Hume on causality
‫ ﮲‬Constant and regular conjunction
‫ ﮲‬Correlation is not the same as causation
‫ ﮲‬No a priori connection, i.e. no necessary connection between cause and effect

Dogmatic or axiomatic starting point
Reason: Rationalism Perception: Empiricism
Descartes: Innate ideas Locke: Tabula Rasa
The mind is like an empty page
All knowledge comes from experience
Sense perception causes ideas

How can we justify the universal validity of (Newton’s) physics?

Copernical turn: change of perspective
For dogmatics it’s an arrow, not a turn.

Transcendental Idealism
Transcendental = that which can be known as a condition of the possibility of experience
=/= transcendent (surpassing the limits of experience)

Idealism = doubt that there are any objects other than minds and their representations
A kind of realism (it assumes that objects do exist independently of our perceptions)

Reading Questions on Kant
1. What is the distinction between public and private reason?
2. What is the difference between a “positive” and a “negative” use of the Critique of Pure
Reason?
3. Please compare these two different texts. Are there

Week II – German Idealism and the “Cunning of Reason”
Discussion Kant, intro Hegel

Immanuel Kant – Discussion
Copernican Revolution:
Our cognition must conform to objects → objects
must conform to our cognition

Empirical knowledge of Phenomena

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper marijev. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,99  3x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen