100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Summarize Survey Research Methods - Fowler (C2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11) €4,99
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Summarize Survey Research Methods - Fowler (C2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11)

1 beoordeling
 8 keer verkocht

This summarize contains the chapters above and all relevant and important information for the test. Including types of error, how to sample, nonresponse, methods of data collection, evaluating questions, ethical issues and examples for clarification.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 14  pagina's

  • Nee
  • H2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11
  • 28 januari 2020
  • 14
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (2)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: fransalazarabsolo • 3 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
billyriet
Samenvatting: Survey research methods – Floyd Fowler
Chapter 2: types of error in a survey
One fundamental premise of the survey research process is that by describing the sample of
people who actually respond one can describe the target population
A second fundamental premise of survey research is that the answers people give can be used
to accurately describe characteristics of the respondents
So you want: to make good inferences
 Well answers to measure characteristics
 A sample responding who mirrors the population
The above are potential sources of error, the design and the way the data is collected can
affect both of one of these.
Error associated with who answers
A sample can always differ from the larger population. One goal of survey methodology is to
minimize the random differences between the sample and the population, but on average it
evens out.
 Sampling error = (=random error) random variation from the true characteristics of the
population can lead to possible error because you collect data from a sample and not the
whole population
 Bias = (second kind of error = systematic) in some kind of way the people responding to a
survey are different from the target population as a whole
3 steps in process of collecting data that can affect bias:
1. Choosing a sample frame: those who actually have a chance to be selected. For
variables on which people who are included vs Those who are systematically left out,
the data will be biased (for example: all of those without a phone, when that’s your
method)
2. Process of selecting: has to be random in order to not have bias
3. Failure to collect answers from everyone selected to be in the sample is a potential
source of bias: unable to answer, not available (health, language), refuse etc.  this
affects the answers and result may be biased.
Error associated with answers
What surveys try to measure can be divided in two categories: objective facts (voted or not,
height etc.)  you can directly asses how accurate the answers where) or subjective facts 
psychometricians think of answers consisting of two components: the true score/value for
individual + error in the answer given by individual
Errors can be caused by all kinds of things: misunderstanding, lack of knowledge etc.
rounding up or down your height, etc.
Validity = the relationship between an answer and some measure of the true score/degree to
which answers systematically differ from a true score in one direction. So you want to make
the error term as small as possible so the answers mainly reflect the true score. If the error
associated with answers is random the average answers should be the same as the average
true value.

, For questions designed for objective facts, they have a potential to be biased, like how many
cigarettes one smokes, estimates of these behaviours are likely to be biased  systematically
different from the true scores.
The idea of validity of subjective measures can’t be observed directly. The calculations are
more complicated, but the end result is the same: an estimate of how well answers reflect the
construct they are designed to measure.
So critical for the quality of the survey you want:
- Inference that answers can be used to accurately describe a sample of respondents: so
generalization from answers to reality
- And accurately generalize from a sample of respondents to an entire population
Two kinds of error:
1. Random error: variability around the true values
2. Systematic error: (biased) differences between sample and population OR between
answers and true values

Chapter 3: sampling
Sometimes the goal of information gathering is not to generate statistis about a population
but describe a set of people in more general way  for these purposes available or volunteers
may be useful. The way to evaluate a sample is by examining the process by which it was
selected. 3 key aspects of sample selection:
1. How well sample frame corresponds to the population a researcher wants to describe
 sample frame = people who have a chance to be selected
2. Probability sampling  each person must have a know chance of selection, if
researcher of respondent (e.g. availability) affect these chances there is no statistical
basis for evaluating the sample representativeness
3. The details of sample design (size, procedures) will influence precision of estimates
The sample frame: most of the times is done in one of these ways:
1. Done from more or less complete list of individuals in population
2. Done from a set of people who go somewhere or do something that enables them to be
sampled (no advanced list)
3. Addresses or housing units are sampled as first stage of selecting a sample: can be
done from a list, geographic areas or numbers associated with housing units
Characteristics of a sample from you should evaluate:
1. Comprehensiveness: how completely it covers the target population: general list are
often very exclusive (registered voters e.g.), published telephones often covers only
50% of population, households exclude homeless, prisoners etc.
2. Whether or not a person’s probability of selection can be calculated
3. Efficiency, or rate at which target population can be found among those in frame. In
some cases, sampling frame includes people not part of target population
Selecting a one-stage sample
 Simple random sampling requires numbered list of population, members are selected
once at a time
 Systematic sample: mechanically easier to create than above. The benefits of
stratification can be accomplished more easily.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper billyriet. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75282 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€4,99  8x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd