College aantekeningen
College aantekeningen Making diversity work: Building inclusive organizations ()
- Instelling
- Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
Complete college aantekeningen
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 23 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 23 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Seven headed monster of inequalityMulti-level, interdisciplinary approach
Symbolical
- How are women and non-dominant groups and their societal roles represented in the
linguistic, narrative and visual structures that shape the organization?
Institutional
- What are effective responses to inequality and exclusion at work at the institutional level?
Experiential
- How do women and non-dominant group members experience the many forms of inequality
in the workplace?
Diversity: everything that distinguishes people from one another. But most attention for dimensions
on which differences in outcomes and discrimination occur
Diversity dimensions
- Surface-level dissimilarity (relatively visible/readily detectable)
- Deep-level dissimilarity (relatively invisible/underlying)
Galinsky and colleagues
- Diversity present in groups, communities and nations
- Diversity acquired through individuals’ personal experiences
Which diversity matters
Why organizations work with diversity
- Moral reasons (equal treatment, equal opportunities, equal outcomes)
- Societal reasons (emphasize good outcomes, focus on consequences of inequality)
- Compliance (mandatory, regel- en wetgeving)
- Synergetic reasons (relationship employee-organization), personal and business economic
growth, employee satisfaction, harmony among employees)
- Business-economic reasons (attract diverse employees, increase well-being, increase
creativty, reduce lawsuits, enhance reputation) business-case for diversity
Matters for what? Not self-evident that diversity leads to better performance and innovation
Diversity paradox climate for inclusion is key
Climate for inclusion
- Fair and unbiased treatment of employees
- Open toward and values differences between employees
- Includes all employees in decision making
Perceived inclusion: perception of employee that the group gives them a sense of authenticity and
belonging
Conclusion
- Climate for inclusion buffers negative effects of feelings of dissimaliraty on perceived
inclusion
- Deep-level dissimilarity was more important than surface-level dissimilarity for social
inclusion at work (but not always found)
- Climate for inclusion not only benifits inclusion of dissimilar people, but also similar people
,Mechanisms of inclusion
- Social categorization and intergroup bias
- Similarity-attraction (subgroup formation)
- Minority stress and related processes (monitoring environment for cues of belonging)
Manels: all-male panels
Diversity and inclusion policies should be
- Integrated
- Systematically developed and implemented
- Based on scientific insights
, People are blind to the norm category
On the failure to notice that white people are white
What is the norm?
Male, white, heterosexual, cisgender, able-bodied
*The workplace is heteronormative
Manifestations of heternormativity at work
Group (LGB vs. non-LGB) work-sexual identity conclict
- Less room for their sexual orientation
- Moderator/mediator: inclusive climate
Both workplace well-being
Identity blind vs identity conscious approach (artikel 3)
- Will stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination diminish if we ignore certain social categories?
- Yes
Diversity approaches
- Identity-blind approach: everyone is an individual first. We should focus on individual
differences and/or similarities
- Identity-conscious approach: everyone has a different social identity, which is valuable and
affects their lived experience
Colorblindness: minimizes the use and significance of racial group membership and suggets that race
should not and does not matter
Multiculturalism: racial group membership matters and should be acknowledged, respected, and
even valued
(Dis)advantages identity blindness
Advantages
- Diminishes open conflict
- Minimizes discomfort
Disadvantages
- Assumes equal starting position
- Assumes unequal treatment in the past
- Ignores importance of privilige
- Ignores ethnic/socio-economic/gender differences
- Fails to capitalize on advantages of diversity
Implications of colorblind approach
Colorblindness
- Has appeal due to its ego-protective features
- Reduces sensitivity to racism
- Can undermine interracial interactions
- Can result in perceptions of and expectations for people of color that subvert instiutional
diversity efforts
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper mversleijen. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79223 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen