Samenvatting
Lecture 5 Full Summary personality disorders
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
here's lecture 5 and the literature <3
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 9 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 9 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
LECTURE 5 – PERSONALITY ASSESSMENTConstruct validity of Personality Disorders
Debate: between medical/categorical approach and dimensional approach
à DSM-5-TR
Classification, consistent with medical treatment, dichotomous, categorical phenomena
- Dichotomous means that conditions are generally classified as present/absent.
- A person has MDD or not, binary categorization doesn’t account for degree of severity.
- Categorical, disorders classified as distinct entities, specific diagnostic criteria/labels for each condition
E.g. pathologies are categorized into categories, depressive, anxiety, neurodevelopmental disorders.
à DSM Criteria
- Symptoms vs. traits, polythetic criteria, heterogeneity, comorbidity.
- Polythetic – does not need to meet every criterion for diagnosis, variability in how disorder manifest,
more individualized diagnosis, distinct but related symptoms of the same disorder.
à Differential diagnostics
- Motivation, inter/intrapersonal dynamic
Alternative models of PD
- Five-Factor Model (FFM maps PD) or Big Five
o Openness to experience
o Conscientiousness
o Extraversion
o Agreeableness
o Neuroticism
- Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD)
o Level of personality functioning, emphasizes
severity and specific traits of PDs
o 5 domains broken into 25 specific traits: negative affectivity (traits: anxiousness, emotional
liability, hostility), detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism.
- ICD-11
o Dimensional system, severity (mild, moderate, severe) rather than categorization into types
o Specific dysfunctional personality traits across 5 domains, negative affectivity, detachment,
dissociality, disinhibition, anankastic (obsessive tendencies), similar DSM5 AMPD.
, Personality Assessment for PD
à What are they?
- Written, oral and projective instruments, assessment will include:
o personal history, weakness/strengths, intelligence, defence mechanisms, attachment style,
coping styles, social abilities, childhood, traumatic experiences, cognitions, affects, emotion,
regulation styles, personality traits, environment, support system.
à Why conduct assessments for PD?
- Objective data on patients psychological functioning, help answering questions regarding treatment.
à Evidence-based practice in PD assessment
- Clinician can be biased by personal interest/bias, gender stereotypes, over/under diagnosis.
- What entrustment should we use then? There is no gold standard, not one instrument is 100% solid,
there is nonreliable validated clinical expert.
- Interpret the results of various instruments in combination with each other using multiple theoretical
frameworks.
à Recent developments in personality assessment
- Clinical value of DSM-V classification, underlying personality. dynamics, descriptive/categorical vs.
structural dynamic assessment, context.
- Need for performance-based measures though.
à Integrative psychodiagnostics, comprehensive approach in assessing PDs by evaluating these 6 domains:
Domain 1: Manifest pathology
o Objective/subjective patterns/symptoms/behaviours that indicate PD (impulse, emotional
stability, self-harm, detachment, antagonism).
o File research, clinical judgment, WAIS-V, SCID-5-PD, PID-5, UCL, SCL-90, BSI
Domain 2: social network/environment
o Social interactions, relationships, stressors, do they have support system?
o Clinical interview/hetero anamnesis
Domain 3: manifest cognitive schemas
o Deep-seated beliefs, cognitive patterns, assumptions, schemas.
o Implicit/explicit schemas, dominant theme of self, rigid, not adaptive, arise in childhoods,
conscious.
o Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ), NPV-2
Domain 4: personality structure/ dynamics
o Not diagnosis but generating hypothesis about structural, underlying vulnerability of patient.
o MMPI-20RF (T/F response to items)/MMPI-3 (53 empirically validated scales), DSFM,
NVM, projective tests (thematic apperception test, house-
tree-person, sentence competence
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper karachwt. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,60. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64438 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen