College aantekeningen
College aantekeningen Patient Centred Care Delivery (PCCD) (GW4002MV-24)
Hoorcollege patient-centered care delivery
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 22 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 22 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Patiënt Centred Care DeliveryInhoudsopgave
Week 1 – Theme 1/Shared Decision Making (SDM).........................................................1
SDM: What?................................................................................................................. 1
SDM: Why?.................................................................................................................. 2
Possible objections of SDM.......................................................................................... 2
SDM: When?................................................................................................................ 3
SDM: obstacles............................................................................................................ 3
SDM: Requirements..................................................................................................... 4
Lecture 2 – Patient centered care delivery......................................................................4
Evidence based and PCC models.................................................................................5
Barriers PCCD.............................................................................................................. 6
Literature – Naomi (2008)........................................................................................... 6
Literature – Kuipers (2021)..........................................................................................7
Lecture 3 – Quality of Care Delivery...............................................................................8
Knowledge Clips theme 5 – Patient context matter......................................................13
Knowledge video 6........................................................................................................ 16
Part A: The role of community in promoting PCCD.....................................................16
Part B – Expanded CCM............................................................................................. 17
Part C: ICCC framework............................................................................................. 19
Part D – WHO framework age-friendly cities..............................................................21
Week 1 – Theme 1/Shared Decision Making (SDM)
Shared decision making always comes down to informed consent.
Informed consent is a one way interaction: the doctor gives information
and the patient says yes or no
Shared decision making is a two way interaction: the doctor gives
information and the patients asks question, clarification
- Discuss
- Debate
- Decide
The 3 D’s of shared decision making.
SDM: What?
Decision making model situated on a continuum between two extremes:
- Paternalism: the doctor tells whatever the patient needs
- Consumerism: informed choice (not SDM)
Numerous definitions of SDM:
- Define/explain problem
- Present options, discuss pros/cons
- Patient values/preferences, discuss patient ability/self efficacy
, - Doctor knowledge/recommendations
- Check/clarify understanding
- Make or explicitly defer decision
- Arrange follow-up
In summary:
1. Choice talk: here is exchange of information between a patient and
doctor, medical and personal information included
o Both are experts:
Doctor: medical knowledge
Patient: its own life and troubles
2. Option talk: Possible options and outcomes are discussed and
considered by patient and doctor
3. Decision talk: Doctor and patient reach consensus about what needs
to be done
This model is just a guideline, there’s not just one route and it all comes
down to having a conversation with the patient.
SDM: Why?
1. Ethicists
a. The right of patients to determine what happens to their
bodies is self evident. SDM increases autonomy
2. Economists
a. Increase in consumer power is a means to subject health care
providers to market discipline. SDM will increase cost
effectiveness.
3. Epidemiologists
a. Patients have an almost universal desire to be informed and to
be involved in the treatment in one way or another
4. Clinicians
a. More active involvement of patients in decision making
process improves treatment relationship with better outcomes
as a result enhanced patient adherence, more satisfaction,
better clinical outcomes
b. Some authors consider joint exexution to be the 4th element of
SDM
Possible objections of SDM
- Options may harm patients who are having difficulties in decision
making. Options may result in a growing awareness of missed
opportunities
- Patients may find it difficult to appreciate outcomes because of their
inability to foresee how they will adapt to outcomes
- Choice and having a say raise expectations. Dissapointment and
dissatisfaction lie ahead when clinical realities fail to meet
expectations
, SDM: When?
- SDM is propagated but rarely practiced in everyday health cate
o Dominant doctors
o Lack of time
o Docile patients
o Stress
o Lack of skills
o Communication problems
- It seems to be more appropriate for some patient groups and less for
others:
o Relatively healthy patients
o Patients with active coping abilities
o Patients with chronic conditions
- Less:
o Elderly patients
o Less educated patients
o Patients with acute or very severe somatic problems
o Patient who have to take minor decisions (low risk, minimally
invasive treatment)
o Patients with mental health problems
- In certain circumstances its appropriate:
o There’s uncertainty regarding effectiveness or outcome
o Risks and benefits are considerable or equal
o The patient is willing and able to participate actively
o The patient is able to comprehend and trade-offs (off-label
drugs prescription)
o SDM seems to fit perfectly with changing priorities in health
care, from acute to chronic care, and from cure (of diseases) to
management (of chronic illneses)
SDM: obstacles
1. Lack of resources (time, money)
a. Seeing more patients in less time is profitable
b. Implementation of SDM is costly
2. Fear of loss of professional autonomy
a. Doctors are creatures of habit
3. Poor communications
a. Giving information about risks and possible outcomes can be
extremely difficult
4. Patient needs and expectations
a. Belief among doctors that patients do not wish to be fully
informed and have little desire for continuous active
participation
b. Preferences among patients for active participation do in fact
vary
c. SDM has to be a choice as well
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jaenevanleest. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,18. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen