Samenvatting
Additional summary research methods
This is an additional summary on the research methods. It can really come in handy for the exam.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 100 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 100 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
POLITICAL RESEARCH – Methods and practical skills1. Political Research
Authors’ approach to pol research consists of 3 basic positions
o 1. Encourage pluralism in methodological approaches to pol researchers
o 2. Believe that research should be problem-driven
o 3. Believe research should be relevance to important pol questions and policy issues
Issues in political research
Significant question
o = directly relevant to solving real-world problems and furthering the goals of a specific
scientific literature
o All questions should help to generate valid and reliable knowledge about the
questions they address
Politics and IR
Researchers have increasingly come to appreciate the extent to which pol processes
operate across levels or at multiple scales
Sub field of pol research
o Political theory
o Public policy
o Public administration
o Public law
Empirical vs normative research
Empirical research
o Addresses events and pol phenomena that we observe in the real world
o Questions about what is
Normative research
o Addresses questions about what should or ought to be
John Gerring and Joshua Yesnowitz
o Argue that empirical study of social phenomena is meaningless if it has no normative
import and it is misleading if its normative content is left ambiguous
In sum
o good social science is both empirically grounded and relevant to human concerns
o normative theorizing must deal in facts and empirical work must deal in values
Positivism vs interpretivism
, Ontology
o the essence of being – i.e. what is the object that is being studied
o what we can know about the world
Epistemology
o how do we know what is to be known – i.e. what kind of evidence do we need?
o how we can know it
Positivism
o empirical observation is key!
o Scientific knowledge of the social world is limited to what can be observed and that we
can explain and predict social phenomena by discovering empirical regularities,
formulating law like generalizations, and establishing causal relationships
Interpretivism
o Maintains that knowledge of the social world can be gained through interpreting the
meanings which give people reasons for acting, understand human behavior, but we
cannot explain or predict it on the basis of law-like generalizations and establishing the
existence causal relationship
Positivism and interpretivism have different ontological and epistemological
commitments
o However, researchers working in both traditions generally follow the same
methodological conventions
Realist = foundationalist
Constructivist = anti foundationalist
Foundationalist
o = all truth claims can be judged objectively true of false
Anti- foundationalist
o = argument that there are never neutral grounds for asserting what is true in any time/
space
Realism
o real world exists independently of our knowledge of it and can be discovered as such if
we use the right methods in the right way
Constructivism
o world is socially constructed and can be interpreted in diff ways
o crucial: idea of double hermeneutic
idea of double hermeneutic
o there are 2 levels of ‘understanding’
the world is interpreted by the actors (one hermeneutic level)
, and their interpretation is interpreted by the observer (second hermeneutic level)
o for researchers: aim explore own interpretation of interpretations made by actors
about their behavior
Behavioural and rational choice approaches: positivist position (p10)
Psychologists lean towards positivism
Feminism: many constructivist position, some positivists
Poststructuralists see epistemology as prior to ontology
Marxists: critical realist position
Researchers share similar goals
Quantitative vs qualitative research
Quantitative research
o Based on statistical analysis of carefully coded information for many cases or
observations
Qualitative research
o Tends to be based on the discursive analysis of more loosely coded information for
just a few cases
o Some… p. 6
o Others… p.6
Gary King, Robert Keohane, Sidney Verba: began an important debate about
methodology
The research process
Part 1: Philosophy of social science
Methodology refers to the conduct of inquiry
Ontology, Epistemology
In sum: understanding the terms of the major debates in the philosophy of social
science, and sensitivity to their implications, is an important part of producing good
research
3 approaches
o Positivism
o Interpretivism
o Scientific realism
3 tenets positivism
o 1. Scientific methods may be applied to the study of social life
o 2. Empiricism: Knowledge is only generated through observation
, o 3. Facts and values are distinct, thus making objective inquiry possible
Interpretivism
Scientific realism
o Knowledge is not limited to what can be observed but also includes theoretical
entities
Critics to positivism argue that knowledge produced by social-scientific research is not
value-neutral, but is shaped by a variety of factors, including existing scientific theory,
politics, and power relations, cultural values
Part 2: How to do research
A research question is one that
o 1. Has significance for a topic or issue relating to the subject matter of our field
o 2. Is researchable
o 3. Has not yet been answered definitively
To formulate a research question you need to be clear about what you want to know
The research process is often circuitous
Dust of detail (learning more about the specific facts of the case or question or issue, or
observations of other scholars that we treat as facts)
In sum: the research process consists of a set of components or series of steps but, in
practice, the process of research does not unfold in the sort of linear fashion that it
suggests
Descriptive questions
o Will describe the characteristics of something
Explanatory questions
o Explain what factors or conditions are causally connected to a know outcome
Normative questions
o How something should be
Working hypothesis
o An operational hunch about what you expect to find
Hypothesis
o = a reasoned, clearly specified hunch or expectation w which you begin your research
and which helps guide and focus your research
o Can be tested in 2 ways (evidence or operate as a guide to a process of discovery)
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper seminckursula. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77254 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen