Samenvatting
Summary 2.1 Problem 7
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
- Boek
- Cognitive Psychology
Summary for p7 for course 2.1
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 6 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 6 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Problem 7Eysenck, Matlin, Sternberg
Judgement: involves deciding on the likelihood of various events using incomplete information
- What matters in judgement is accuracy
Decision making: involves selecting one option from several possibilities
- We assess the quality of our decisions in terms of consequences
- Judgement often forms an important initial part of the decision-making process
- Uncertainty of decision making is more common than the certainty of deductive reasoning
HEURISTICS by Kahneman & Tversky
- Most people given judgment tasks make use of rules of thumb or heuristics
- Heuristics are strategies to make decisions simpler and faster, heuristics reduce the
difficulty of decision making
REPRESENTATIVENESS HEURISTICS: involves deciding something belongs to a given category
because it appears typical or similar to that category
- we believe that random looking outcomes are more likely than orderly outcomes
- people ignore important statistical information that they should consider
Small Sample Fallacy: people think a small sample will be representative of the population
from which it’s selected
- representativeness is so compelling that we often fail to pay attention to sample size
- in reality sample size is an important characteristic that should be considered
- a large sample is statistically more likely to reflect true proportions
Base Rate Fallacy: paying too little attention to important information about base-rate
- base-rate is how often an item occurs in the population
- we focus on representativeness instead of base-rate
- this task provides support for the dual-process approach, different parts of the brain are
activated when people use Type 1 processing, rather than slow Type 2 processing?
Conjunction fallacy: the mistaken belief that the conjunction or combination of 2 events (A
and B) is more likely than 1 event (A or B) on its own
- representativeness is so powerful that people ignore mathematical implications of the
conjunction rule
- example: Linda is a bank teller or Linda is a feminist bank teller
- People rely on representativeness because the description sounds more like a feminist
bank teller
- People interpret the statement “Linda is a bank teller” as implying she is not an active
feminist
AVAILABILITY HEURISTIC: the frequencies of events can be estimated on the basis of how easy it is
to think of relevant examples (retrieve from memory)
- This heuristic is accurate as long as availability is correlated with true, objective frequency
- Unlike representativeness heuristic (given a specific example and then decide if it’s similar
to a category), you are given a general category and then you must recall the specific
examples
, - Factors can bias availability heuristics and influence memory retrieval:
Recency: more recent events are more available
- you judge recent items to be more likely than they actually are
Familiarity: can produce a distortion in frequency estimation
- media coverage can influence viewers’ ideas
Recognition heuristic: operates when you recognize one category, but not the other, you
conclude that the recognize category has higher frequency
- leads to accurate decisions
- Example: which Italian city has a larger population Milan or Modena? Milan is recognized
more so in this case the decision to pick Milan is accurate
Illusion Correlation: availability heuristic contributes to a cognitive error called illusion
correlation
- occurs when people believe that two variables are statistically related, even though there
is no actual evidence for that relationship
- Example: we often believe that a certain group of people tend to have a certain
characteristic, even though that stereotype is not true
THE ANCHORING AND ADJUSTMENT HEURISTIC:
- We begin with a first approximation, which serves as an anchor, then we make
adjustments to that number based on additional information
- This heuristic often leads to reasonable answers just as representativeness and availability
heuristics
- However, people rely too heavily on the anchor and their adjustment are too small
- This emphasizes top-down processing – people endorse their current beliefs rather than
questioning them
Estimating confidence intervals: we not only use this heuristic for a single number but
confidence intervals
- We make errors by estimating a range that is too narrow
Alternative views to heuristic approach
Gigerenzer and colleagues argue that the heuristic approach underestimated people’s decision-
making skills, they say people make fairly realistic judgements
Ecological rationality: describes how people create a wide variety of heuristics to help
themselves make useful, adaptive decisions in real world
Default heuristic: if there is a standard option in which people do nothing, people will
choose it
- Example: you have to sign up to become an organ donor, so the majority remains a non-
donor using the default heuristic
Limitations to original heuristics-and-biases approach
- heuristics are vaguely defined
- theorizing based on this approach is limited
- it’s sometimes unfair to conclude people’s judgements are biased and error-prone
- research is detached from the realities of everyday life - emotional & motivational factors
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ebru1365. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67232 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen