Samenvatting
Summary 2.1 Problem 4
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
Summary for p4 for course 2.1
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Problem 4Matlin, Baddeley, Riegler, Sternberg
Article: Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding by Bransford and Johnson
SIMILARITY BASED MODELS
- Judging the similarity between the target object and some standard in long-term
memory
- Bottom-up (perceive) approach to categorization
1. TRADITIONAL VIEW
- According to this, items are classified into particular categories if they have
certain features or characteristics
- E.g. triangle is a closed 3-sided figures with an angle sum of 180, shapes that have
these characteristics are triangles, shapes that don’t are not
Limitations:
- It’s difficult to specify many concepts in terms of features that are both necessary
and sufficient
- Can’t explain the fact that our representations have a graded structure
- Categories don’t have clear cut boundaries, they have fuzzy boundaries
2. THE PROTOTYPE APPROACH
- Members of a category are evaluated based on their resemblance to other
members
- Members that have a high family resemblance are typical members and serve as
the standard, the most representative member: prototype
- Those with low family resemblance are less typical members
- A category has a graded structure, beginning with the most
representative/prototypical members and it continues onto the less typical
members
- The prototype approach is similarity-based because membership is determined
by an item’s similarity to the prototype
- Prototypes are abstracted through repeated experience with category members
- Prototypicality: the degree to which members are representative of their
category
Characteristics of prototypes:
- They are supplied as examples of a category – typicality effect
- They are judged more quickly than non-prototypes, after semantic priming
o Semantic priming effect: people respond faster to an item if it was
preceded by an item with similar meaning
- They share attributes in a family resemblance category
o Family resemblance: no single attribute is shared by all examples but each
example has at least one attribute in common
Pros:
- Explains the ability to from concepts of groups
- Can be applied to complex social relations
- Accounts cultural differences
, Limitations:
- People’s representations of categories and their characteristics are more complex
- Fails to capture that category representation is sensitive to context, what we view
as a typical category depends on how we think about it
- Problems when conjunction of 2 concepts are considered
- We store more specific encounters, we don’t abstract everything
3. THE EXEMPLAR APPROACH
- We represent categories in terms of examples or category exemplars
- There is no single representation of a category that is abstracted over time
- Our representations consist of every single encounter we’ve had with that
concept and we retrieve one of those encounters
- The exemplar approach is also similarity based: objects and events are assessed
in term of similarity to a standard but in this case the standard is a specific
example rather than a generalized categorization
- The standard will also depend on circumstances
- The typicality effect is not a problem: we’re more likely to retrieve the example
that’s been encoded more frequently
- The biasing effect of context is not a problem: a particular context can activate
certain exemplars, priming the retrieval
Pros: Takes individual differences into account
Limitations:
- In some circumstances, people do use abstracted representations constructed
from repeated encounters
- Cognitive economy: every single encounter with every single encounter can’t be
stored in memory
- Because we don’t have enough capacity, the theory can’t explain what we keep
as examples and what we erase
PROTOTYPE VS EXEMPLAR APPROACH
- both compare examples you just encoded to what you have already encoded
- both make similar predictions about semantic memory
- Prototype: a representation is a typical item of the category
- Exemplar: a representation is a collection of numerous specific members of a
category
- Exemplar: you don’t need an abstraction process to find a typical, which forces
you discard useful information about individual cases
- The exemplar may be more useful for a category with few members
- Prototype may be more useful for a category with numerous members
- Individual differences may be important in the way people represent categories
NAMING OBJECTS – LEVELS OF CATEGORIZATION:
- Concepts are organized into hierarchies: 3 levels:
- Superordinate categories at the top e.g. item of furniture
- Basic-level categories at the intermediate level e.g. chair
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ebru1365. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 73918 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen
