100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Social cognition and affect - lecture notes €3,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Social cognition and affect - lecture notes

1 beoordeling
 86 keer bekeken  2 keer verkocht

Dit is een document met uitgebreide aantekeningen van alle hoorcolleges voor het vak Social cognition and affect aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Dit bestand is een goede aanvulling op het bestand met de samenvattingen van het boek, maar het bestand kan op zichzelf natuurlijk ook goed helpen met...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 37  pagina's

  • 8 september 2020
  • 37
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (3)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: evaswinkels • 8 maanden geleden

avatar-seller
Astridtos
Lectures
Lecture 1: What is social about cognition and affect?
Basic assumption of research and theorising in the area of social cognition:
 Social thinking is not passive perception, but active interpretation.
 People have naïve theories about themselves and others.
 Social thinking can be subject to biases and it is very much linked to the specific situation.

The Guardian’s blind data series  the same situation can lead to very different perceptions. As an
external perceiver, one can often have quite an accurate guess on how the evening went.

Primacy effect: first piece of information someone gets about another person influences the rest.

Algebraic model – one piece of information might have a bigger effect than the other pieces, though
still summation. This adjusts the evaluation of each individual trait all equally up or down.

Configural model – shows the traits being integrated to form a unified impression of the person, in
which the meaning of individual traits changes in the context of all other traits.

Lewin: field theory – behaviour is a function of the person and the situation “… and the meaning of
every event depends directly upon the nature of its background… the background itself is not often
perceived, but only the ‘figure’”. Individual behaviour can be studied by examining the different
forces in a given situation (motivational influences). The study of an individual isolated from its
context is likely to lead to an inaccurate picture of the person.

The figure  the theory representing an individual’s pressures to study or not, based on subjectively
perceived driving forces and restraining forces that together motivate behaviour.

Asch – study with lines, the role of context.

Messages from these examples:
 People do not passively perceive the environment, they are ACTIVE perceivers.
 SUBJECTIVE interpretations can alter individual responses to situations.
 Not all aspects of a situation receive equal attention, a SELECTIVE subset of information is
used.

Goal of research on social cognition  identification of mechanisms and factors that influence these
active, subjective and selective interpretations of the social environment.




The cognitive miser has had most consequences for areas outside psychology, especially in
economics.

,Sarah Palin in SNL – the pre-existing impression of a person determines the “recall” of certain info.
There is also the possibility that falsehoods that fit a certain attitude are less condemned because
“they could have been true”.

Halo effect – good looking  nice, intelligent etc. The overgeneralisation from the impression that
someone looks good, can also lead to wrong judgements.

Culture/group are important reference points. “We do not face stimulus situations involving other
people or even the world of nature around us in an indifferent way; we are charged with certain
modes of readiness, certain established norms, which enter to modify our reactions”.

Social cognition: S – O (organism) – R framework  each step is viewed as cognitive mediated.
Behaviourism: S – R framework.

Social knowledge is mentally organised in schemas/categories/concepts (representations of objects,
people, behaviours that we believe ‘belong’ together), we have categories/concepts for social
groups, personality traits, events (scripts).

Functions of social knowledge:
 Categorisation
 Inferring additional attributes (going beyond the given information)
 Understanding
 Make predictions
 Respond appropriately

Media images often speak to social knowledge/stereotypes.

Four horsemen of automaticity:
 Lack of conscious intent
e.g. Stroop effect  reading the meaning (unintentional) of the word interferes with the
task.
 Efficiency: costs little mental effort.
If a distraction task influences performance  cognitive control needed for the task. If not 
performance based on efficiency, automatic processes.
When not under load  correction for the situation.
When under load  no correction of the situation (study Gilbert et al.)
 thus, categorisation and inferences are automatic, situational correction is not!
 Lack of awareness
We are not aware that a process takes place, how it takes place and what the result of this
process is  beautiful is good.
 Lack of control: process cannot be controlled, it starts and runs. Even if you consciously don’t
want to do it.

Automatic vigilance – people more quickly see the negative face on the right than the positive one
on the left.

,Automatic behaviour doesn’t always respond to your feelings, it is not (always) irrational, it is not by
definition inflexible and it is not (always) superficial or shallow.

Controlled processing and behaviour:
 People have the ability to direct and regulate cognition and behaviour.
 Needs, motives and goals induce controlled processing.
 People can select, implement, and regulate goals.
 Controlled processes can also occur subconsciously.

If individuals detect cues that make them distrust a person, people often diverge from routines.

Mayo  default processes can be altered by subtle social cues. The extent to which certain
processes are actually the default for a person varies between individuals.

Automatic and controlled processes can occur simultaneous and can interact with each other. The
difference between the two is gradual, not absolute.

, Influences on automatic vs. controlled processing:
 available cognitive resources (however, does NOT always mean better judgments
 personal interest in a topic/situation
 cultural Norms
 stereotypes
 expectancies
 time pressure
 affective states:
 e.g. fear might lead to very selective attention m

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Astridtos. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52510 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,49  2x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd