100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Rassin (2020) - Legal Psychology €6,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Rassin (2020) - Legal Psychology

1 beoordeling
 230 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht

Summary of the book Legal Psychology by Rassin (2020). Completely covers every chapter and everything I deemed the most important to remember - I will study for the exam just using this summary. ISBN 6938 Complete samenvatting van het boek Legal Psychology door Rassin (2020). Elk hoofdstuk is apa...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 15  pagina's

  • Ja
  • 16 september 2020
  • 15
  • 2020/2021
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: talinagg • 4 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
KFoster
CH1 - The Legal Context
 A legal psychologist is concerned with the first legal question of art. 350 Sv.; a forensic
psychologist with the third and fourth question.
 How do we establish perpetratorship? Despite the legal context, it is not by legal expertise.
And it is not by absolute fact finding, as would be the case in scientific research. It is more like
a historical endeavor: the judge decides whether there is enough incriminating evidence
(gathered by police in a casefile) to convict the suspect. As long as there are at least two pieces
of independent incriminating evidence the judge is free to display some cherry picking to
favour these over potential pieces of exonerating evidence.
 In our inquisitorial system, experts are hired by the court and are thus expected to deliver
unbiased quality content. The system is truth-centred.
 In an adversarial system, both parties (defence and prosecution) can bring their own
experts. This system seems to be more sensitive to biased and skewed expert writing.
 Civil procedures in the Netherlands have an adversarial system, because fact finding is not
the main concern; it is to decide who is the most right. Information not included in either
party's claims will not be discussed. The legal facts can be remote from the factual truth, as
long as both parties agree on it.

CH2 - Psychological Science
The 4 concurrent approaches in psychology are:
1. Psychodynamics (Freud: the 5 predetermined stages; id(es)-ego(ich)-superego(Überich)/
the unconscious; defence mechanisms; indirect/projective techniques);
2. Behaviourism (overt behaviour; Ockham's razor; Darwinism; tabula rasa; Pavlov’s classical
conditioning; the mere exposure hypothesis; Skinner’s operant conditioning);
 Thorndike's law of effect: the idea that behaviour can be shaped with reward and
punishment. Successful application requires that the test subject perceives a causal
relation between behaviour and consequence. Five circumstances that make such
perception likely are: covariation, chronology, contiguity (closeness in time), similarity
(equality of cause and effect, proportionality in harshness), and absence of alternative
causes.
 The punitive goal of deterrence is rooted in behavioural principles (specific and
general prevention by vicarious learning/modelling).
3. Cognitivism (midway between behaviourism and opening the black box of the mind;
memory; perception; language)
 Dogs that were punished with inescapable shocks would at some point become
apathic and stop attempting to escape at all (learned helplessness), thus only measuring
overt behaviour (behaviourism) wasn’t enough to explain everything;
4. Neuroscience. Neuroscientific journals have a relatively high impact factor, at least in 1999.
 Even though this approach is very popular, one must be careful with interpreting for
example fMRI and EEG data (physiological measures), the correlation between brain
activity and related behaviour might not be as strong as we think - there could be an
overlooked high percentage of false positives because each pixel of the fMRI reflects a
statistical test. Additionally, not nearly all psychological concepts have biological
counterparts.

Popper: confirmation does not count as evidence, except for when it’s the result of a failed attempt
to falsify and it concerns a wild, risky prediction.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper KFoster. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52355 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49  3x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd