H) Assimilation & Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations
Abstract
- Paper extends principles of Social Identity Theory (SIT) to address structural
differentiation within groups
- Subgroup identity threat (SGIT) plays a critical role in the nature of subgroup
relations (SR)
- SGIT is suggested to be biggest obstacle to social harmony
- Threats to social identity produce defensive reactions that result in conflict
- Social harmony best achieved by maintaining subgroup identities & locating them
within the context of a binding superordinate identity
Intro
- Groups in society are a diversity of subgroups defined by intragroup role
assignments or social category memberships
- Argued that an intergroup orientation exists only bc the groups share properties
at a more inclusive level
- Intergroup relations (IR) = a matter of subgroup relations within a
superordinate identity group
- Paper looks at the psychological processes emerging in this context
- Aims to present an integrative framework for understanding dynamics of subgroup
relations & identification
Key Ideas/propositions:
- Minimising distinctiveness threat is a prerequisite for harmonious subgroup
relations
- Superordinate identity should be viewed as a source of positive identity that
does NOT conflict/contradict important attributes of subgroup identity
- Social harmony most likely to be achieved by maintaining subgroup identities (not
weakening), provided they’re nested within a coherent superordinate identity
Social Identity Theory (SIT)
- Model with most to contribute regarding category membership and identity threat
- Original SIT focused on the relation between people striving for self esteem via
evaluating a positive social identity and people’s beliefs about the nature of IR
- Later, self-categorisation theory (SCT), added how social categorisation produced
group prototype-based depersonalisation that underpinned group behaviour
- SIT argues that people are motivated to identify themselves in group terms for:
1) Subjective uncertainty reduction
2) Enhancement of self-esteem
- People are motivated to avoid uncertainty about who they are, and how
they/others should behave
- Social categorisation satisfies this motivation - produces a social field that’s
structured & meaningful
- self-categorisation: the self in relation to other people
- Self-categorisation prescribes one’s perceptions, attitudes, feelings, behaviours
- Uncertainty motivates self categorisation & causes groups to
preserve/enhance their distinctiveness
, - This self-enhancement motive (self-esteem) imbues social categorisation with
valence (the intrinsic attractiveness (positive valence) or aversiveness (negative
valence) of social categories)
- Groups struggle over status and compete for positive social identity and self-esteem
for their members (in order to differentiate)
- SIT argues that people have attitudes and beliefs about the nature of the relation
between groups = ‘social beliefs’
- These beliefs focus on:
- The permeability of intergroup boundaries
- The relative status of groups
- The legitimacy & stability of such status relations
- These beliefs reflect a dynamic ideological contest between groups to justify or
challenge the norm/status quo
- Belief systems determine the strategies used by group members to pursue self-
enhancement & uncertainty reduction
- SIT recognises that intergroup comparisons often occur within the context of
higher order similarity (thus acknowledging subgroups)
- Turner et al put forward 3 levels of self-categorisation important to the self-
concept:
1) Human Identity
- The superordinate level of the self as human being
2) Social Identity
- The intermediate level of the self as a member of a social ingroup as
defined against other groups of people
3) Personal Identity
- The subordinate level of personal self-categorisations based on
interpersonal comparisons
Threat and Intersubgroup Relations
- Important to the SIT’s IR perspective is the need for positive intergroup
distinctiveness
- Strategies to achieve positive intergroup distinctiveness:
- Aggressive intergroup behaviours e.g. prejudice, stereotyping; (characterised by
fear, anxiety)
- Unaggressive intergroup behaviours, e.g. ingroup solidarity, harmless
competition; (relaxed & celebratory behaviours)
- Threat may be an important factor which motivates people to seek differentiation
in different ways (e.g. destructive vs relaxed)
- The search for distinctiveness becomes aggressive when it’s within the context
of identity threat
- In the absence of identity threat, distinctiveness is maintained through more harmless
strategies
- Argued threat to identity may be a cause of subgroup conflict within a
superordinate group context
- Social identity threat provokes behaviours that protect/enhance social identity
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper scarlettrosethorne. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.