100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Philosophical Reflection Lectures Summary Radboud University €6,47
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Philosophical Reflection Lectures Summary Radboud University

2 beoordelingen
 152 keer bekeken  14 keer verkocht

Summary of the lectures of the 2nd year IBC course Philosophical Reflection. Includes example exam questions mentioned in the lectures.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 15  pagina's

  • 18 oktober 2020
  • 15
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (6)

2  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: cm4121 • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: Apina • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you for your great review! :)

review-writer-avatar

Door: linamartens • 3 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
Apina
Philosophical Reflection
N.B. in Lecture 6+7 group presentations took place, therefore they are not included

Contents
Lecture 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................1
Lecture 2 Plato........................................................................................................................................3
Lecture 3 Descartes (Communication in the modern age).....................................................................5
Lecture 4 John Locke (Communication in the modern age)...................................................................5
Lecture 5 The modern standard model of communication – Wilhelm Dilthey´ s hermeneutics.............8
Lecture 8+9 Nietzsche and the Will to Power.........................................................................................9
Lecture 10 Gadamer and Dialogue.......................................................................................................12
Lecture 11 + 12 Heidegger, Arendt and the communication of who we are........................................14



Lecture 1 Introduction
Communication = sharing information via spoken language, written language or another medium

Sometimes the recipient interprets the message wrong because we do not share the same ´´language
´´ →miscommunication

Language is not simply an instrument of expression, sometimes it works like a mirror because it
shows us how we (tried to) communicate about our thoughts

Ancient Philosophy

- Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, etc. belong to the very first Philosophers. Before that, ancient
Greek myths and gods were used to explain how our world works. Philosophers were not
satisfied with these explanations and tried to use rationalism instead. Thus, one of the
biggest opponents of philosophers were the Poets (e.g. Homer).
- Socrates →Plato→ Aristotle→ Alexander the Great (order of who taught who)

Philosophical communication vs. Poetic communication

- Communicates insight - Communication as a (divine) power
- Addresses our reason - Addresses our emotions

The Republic

- Book by Plato where he describes his ideal state
- The head of state is a philosopher king because he knows what is best for society
- He says that poets are dangerous, and we have to get rid of them because they do not
appeal to our reason (logos) but to our emotions and bodily needs (see below). They play
with them and change our rationale which leads to us taking unethical decisions.

, Logos

- We (and animals) have emotions and a body that is marked by drives, lust, longing, and
survival. What differentiates the human from the animal is that humans have logos (reason/
animal rationale). Our emotions and bodily needs should be regulated by logos, so that they
don´t enslave is.

Sophists

- Another opponent of ancient philosophers
- Sophists are the ones who were travelling around from city to city as teachers. They taught
people rhetorics (Art of persuasion, how to speak well and convince the audience) (Sophia =
wisdom). They claim that they can convince everybody on any topic (omniscient). Unlike
sophists, Plato believed that philosophers are the ones who long for wisdom, because they
realise that there is a lack of wisdom (philo-sophia=long for wisdom). For him it was bad that
sophists taught rhetoric and claim that it works on everyone because it might not be the
truth (misguide people) and no one knows everything.
- Plato thinks that Rhetoric should only be used to persuade the audience of the truth.
However, the problem is to find out whether it is the truth or a lie.

Why are language and communication a philosophical problem?

- Language is not always trustworthy because it can distort the truth which disorientates us.
→Problem of being and appearing: While the philosopher participates in dialogues (being),
the poet participates in debates (appearing). People who participate in a dialogue seek for
knowledge and will have a better understanding of the topic because they listen to each
other´s arguments. People who participate in a debate seek for persuasion and will not have
a better understanding because they just want to convince the other person of something
(that does not even have to be the debaters´ point of view).


Plato´s Allegory of the cave (from Republic)

What is life?



Allegory: a group of prisoners are
chained in a cave since birth facing the
wall and unable to ever turn their head.
Behind them is a fire that projects
shadows of the people and things that
pass by the cave. The prisoners start
naming the things they see because
they believe that what they see is the
reality. Suddenly, one prisoner is freed
and brought outside but when he was
told that the shadows were only
reflections of the things that are real he cannot believe it first. He gradually starts adjusting to
everything and then returns to the cave to share his experiences with the others. Since he is no
longer used to the darkness, he has a hard time seeing the shadows on the wall and the other
prisoners believe that he has become blind and crazy. Thus, they resist any attempt to get free.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Apina. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,47. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,47  14x  verkocht
  • (2)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd