Samenvatting
3.3 Psychological Science (elective) - Summary
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
This is a summary of all of the required reading for the theoretical exam of the elective: Psychological Science.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 43 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Week 2:Reading 1: Goodwin chapter 5 (2007) – Introduction to experimental research: (p. 193-230)
-> Essential features of an experiment (independent + extraneous + dependent variables)
-> How the validity of a study can be affected by how well it is designed
• ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH:
o Experiment = independent variables (under control) + extraneous
(constant) + dependent (behaviour measured)
o John Stuart Mill -> inductive logic rules
§ Method of agreement = ‘if X, then Y’ (= experimental group)
• E.g. child watching violent TV -> aggressive
§ Method of differences = ‘if not X, then not Y’ (= control group)
• E.g. child not watching violent TV -> not aggressive
§ -> Will never know for sure but can to experiments with a certain
amount of confidence
• Establishing independent variables:
o Independent variable = the one being studied (will it influence behaviour?)
§ Minimum of 2 levels (i.e. compare 2 situations)
o Field experiment = taken in the field
§ Field research = broader – any research outside the lab (experimental or
not)
o Varieties of independent variables:
§ Situational = features in the environment participants might
encounter
• E.g. how many bystanders affect helping someone or not
§ Task = can vary the types of task performed
• E.g. different optical illusions
§ Instructional = ask different groups to perform a task in different
ways
• E.g. different instructions on how to memorize a list
§ à Possible to combine different types
o Control groups:
§ Experimental group = those who undergo the experiment
§ Control group = don’t do the experiment
• Not necessary in all research
§ “Joint Method” = simple experiment with both groups
• Controlling extraneous variables:
o Extraneous variable = any variables that are not of interest but might
influence the behaviour being studied
§ Failure to control this = can influence measure systematically
§ E.g. only use males in all conditions
o Confound = uncontrolled extraneous variable that ‘covaries’ with the
independent
§ It changes at the same time as the indep (= can’t separate the two)
§ E.g. use only males in one condition & only females in another
1
,• Measuring dependent variables:
o Dependent variable = behaviour being influenced by independent variable
§ Needs to be defined precisely (otherwise replication impossible)
§ Best to use dependent variables that have been used in prior studies
• Shown to be reliable & valid
o Needing to develop a new measure -> should start with pilot study to avoid:
§ Ceiling effect = when average scores for different groups are so high
that no difference can be determined
• Happens when dependent variable is so easy that everyone
gets high score
• Can look at response time
§ Floor effect = when all scores are extremely low -> can’t differentiate
between the groups – happens when test is too difficult
• Can’t do much about it
o Keep control!!
o à Constructs (e.g. anxiety) can be any of these 3 types of variable
• MANIPULATED VS SUBJECT VARIABLES:
o Subject variable = already existing characteristics in participants
§ E.g. sex, age, SES, mental disorder…
§ Don’t manipulate this -> select people from both groups (have &
don’t)
o “True” experiment = with manipulated variables
§ ≠ Quasi experiment/ex post facto/ natural group studies = subject
variable
o à Studies often combine both
• Drawing conclusions when using subject variables:
o (!!!) Can’t draw causal conclusions with subject variables
o Little control -> other aspects of each participant may differ (e.g. self-
confidence)
o Can’t say difference between groups was caused by subject variables
§ Can only say the 2 groups performed differently
o Causal conclusions can be drawn in manipulated samples
• Example of the Bobo doll:
o Independent =
§ Manipulated -> seeing aggression (cartoon, person, control)
§ Non manipulated -> sex; sex congruent vs incongruent with
experimenter
o Extraneous =
§ Avoided size of doll effect (smaller doll for kids)
§ All mildly frustrated (toys taken away from them) – same emotional
arousal
o Dependent =
§ Aggressive behaviour (imitative or not)
2
,• THE VALIDITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH:
• Statistical conclusion validity:
o Statistical conclusion validity = extent to which the researcher uses
statistics properly – draws appropriate conclusions from them
• Construct validity:
o Does that test measure what it intends to
o Construct validity (in experimental research) = adequacy of definition of
both independent & dependent variables
• External validity:
o External validity = degree to which findings generalize to larger population,
environment, time (e.g. not only undergraduates)
o Other populations:
§ 75% of published research in 1980 was done on undergraduates
• Often kinda forced into participating
§ WEIRD population
§ Culture -> should generalize to all cultures when only studied
Western
§ Gender -> lot of studies only use males
• E.g. Kohlberg’s theory of moral development
§ Guidelines for recruiting students:
o Other environment:
§ Do results apply to real life settings
§ Ecological validity = research with relevance for everyday cognitive
activities
§ Should make more studies out of lab
o Other times:
§ Historical events can impact results of past research
3
, • E.g. probably for anxiety in war times or economic crises
(covid)
o à External validity of some research can increase with new research
confirming it (e.g. finding out about false memory – now applied to
eyewitness testimony)
• Internal validity:
o Internal validity = degree to which an experiment is methodologically
sound & confound free
o Confidence results are measured by dependent variable + directly associated
with independent variable + not result of other uncontrolled factor
• THREATS TO INTERNAL VALIDITY:
o Uncontrolled extraneous factors
§ Especially when no control group
o Often happens in longitudinal studies when several measures are taken (pre
& post test)
• Studies extending over a period of time:
o Pretest & posttest -> evaluate participants before & after experience
§ Pretest -> treatment (or control) -> posttest
o History & maturation:
§ History = when an event occurs between pre & posttest that impacts
results
• E.g. change in grading policy can lead to great decreased anxiety
§ Maturation = getting used to what is being tested
• E.g. students get used to college life (reduced test anxiety)
§ à Use of control group can confirm effective results (if same pre &
posttest)
o Regression: (p.221 – 195 of book)
§ Regression to the mean = more likely to pick scores close to the
mean than outliers
§ Need control group of same extremity as testing group
• E.g. testing test anxiety (should keep high anxiety control
group)
• “The improvement could be a regression effect” -> if only 1
measure
• Might get more extreme result the 1st time à 2nd time will be
closer to average
o Testing & instrumentation:
§ Testing = when taking a pretest has an effect on posttest
• E.g. remember some items of pretest
§ Instrumentation = problem when there are changes in
measurements
• E.g. if posttest is easier than pretest
§ à Control group can help detect this
4
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper eurpsychology. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67447 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen