College aantekeningen
College aantekeningen denken over democratie en de rechtsstaat (RGBRF00105)
- Instelling
- Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Uitgewerkte college aantekeningen van denken over democratie en de rechtsstaat.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 48 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 48 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Lectures contemplating democracy & the rule of law2020-2021
,Lecture 1: why do people disagree about democracy and the rule of
law?
The course outline: many issues, but not deeply.
- Why do we keep disagreeing about democracy and the rule of law?
o What is the reason why we understand it differently.
o Can we explain and solve it?
o Are we bound to disagree, or is there light at the end of the tunnel?
- What is democracy, and why do we believe that it is the best form of government?
o Theory about democracy;
o We believe it is the best system: why is that?
o What makes it the best?
o Different faces and manifestation of democracy, it has many.
- What is the function and the content of the rule of law and why does it matter?
o It is very contested conception.
o Two main traditions to understand it.
Formal legality: Rule is stable and universal; says nothing about content of
rules.
Does a state that does not respect human rights have a rule of law?
Does look at the content of rules.
- How does the Internet shape our views on democracy and what went wrong? (guest lecture)
o Internet: how it came to shape democracy and what went wrong.
o When it became about, it was so promising.
o It is a key threat to democracy.
o Threat of polarisation.
- Is there an inherent connection between political legitimacy, democracy and the rule of law?
o Legitimacy at the core of democracy and rule of law.
o What makes political institutions legitimate?
When do we have to obey, and when not.
What are the standards?
o Why does the absence of democracy means illegitimacy?
- What are the reasons for the rise of populism, and is it necessarily a bad thing? (guest
lecture)
o Populism: risks but also benefits for democracy.
- Can there be democracy and the rule of law beyond nation-states?
o Globalised world: how do we hold the global institutions accountable?
o Can we bring democracy to a global level and can we use the Rule of Law on a global
level?
Since the rule of law was developed for a nation state.
Why do we disagree?
We disagree about a lot of things in life: movies, food, music but also social institutions.
That is the same with democracy:
- You have a certain taste; but the scale and weight is much bigger.
o Some disagreements are more important.
- Also a difference between the intrinsic nature of things.
o They are qualitative different.
Freedom
- Freedom is a key political value;
, o It is essential.
o We all understand what it is, that is has something to do with us having control over
our lives. We have preliminary ideas.
- Freedom as an emancipatory idea (for some it is emancipatory);
o We all understand what it means, but at the same time it is not such a simple idea.
o Away from injustices, from being oppressed (BLM).
- Freedom is about enhancing people’s voice in the government;
- Marginalised groups, civil rights activists picture freedom as a goal in their fight for a better
society;
o Freedom as an ideal, what we want to strive.
- Freedom is not always about collective control over government;
o It can mean other things to other people.
- Freedom consists in private enjoyment of one’s life and property;
o Stay away from me: fear for government control.
- The sphere of government should be shrunk as much as possible;
o We want to protect our autonomy, to stay away and no one is allowed to interfere.
- Laissez fair — ‘mind your own business’;
Two versions of the same idea?
- Freedom as the aspiration to participate and to be heard, as a move against the oppression;
o When freedom is a tool for a fight.
- Freedom as the defence of one’s life and values, as a sphere in which no-one can control;
o Freedom as a tool for safety.
- Freedom for vs. freedom from.
o For: to do something; for being heard, participate.
o From: other people intervening in your life, being spied upon, government
controlling you.
These different ideas on freedom clash with each other.
o It is important to know about what they are protesting, their reason is important.
Like protesting against wearing a face-mask or the Berlin wall.
Painting: the black square
Discussion about what is art: it has different meaning for different people.
It is subjective, it is about how we perceive it. There are co-existing two different meanings, but they
are both there.
Essential contested concepts
- Art;
- Democracy;
- Justice;
- Virtue;
- Rule of Law;
They are both channels and products of our communication, they are intersubjective.
What is special about such concepts?
- They are evaluative, and therefore deliver value-judgments;
o They bare normative standards, criteria what you can use.
We assume there are normative standards for art, when we see things as art
and others as not.
o They can be very vague; difficult to grasp.
, You probably can’t even name them.
But you do assume them.
- They denote greatly complex social phenomena;
o They are difficult to define. Like what is art?
o There are thousands definitions. But not one is perfect, there all elements that do
not cover your definition.
- Different people would likely interpret them differently;
o There can deeper layers, about why we see them differently.
- Elements of these concepts are often essentially contested themselves;
o Not only the concept itself, but also the elements of that concept.
o Arts: creativity: what is it, when is there creativity?
You can disagree about the elements of art.
o Justice: equality, also contested.
Where we start (opportunities) but for some reason also where we end.
o We move from one contested conception to another, we can not solve it like that.
- Such concepts do not have an exemplary instantiation;
o We cannot point to something and say this is democracy, freedom, rule of law, etc.
They don’t exists in the objective reality. You can’t really be objective about social
reality.
- Disputes around such concepts are hardly resolvable by argument;
o Because people see it differently and have different ideas about it. There is no
definition you can use to help your argument.
o Unlikely that people find an common ground. The disagreements are always in a
balance, unlikely that they will fall one way or another.
- The use of these concepts is always either aggressive or defensive; example freedom
o Aggressive (in our rhetoric’s): demand political change
o Defensive: don’t touch me! Stay away! (more like privacy, to be left alone)
Freedom (again)
- ‘Freedom’ conceals different values (autonomy or absence of constraints or participation,
etc.);
o Depends on which value we put in the middle. Than the definition of freedom would
change.
- ‘Freedom’ for a conservative is not the same as ‘freedom’ for a liberal;
- People attribute different weight to different ‘aspects’ of freedom;
o Autonomy, constraints, participation.
o With that the meaning of freedom changes.
- There is nothing we could point at and say: ‘This is freedom’;
- Political use of ‘freedom’ is either aggressive/defensive
Democracy and the rule of law
- Democracy and the rule of law are focal points of disagreement; we use these concepts to
present our view on how society should be;
o What is the true democracy? There are many different forms and conceptions. They
belong to different views people have.
o Our views and representation can differ.
o Like what the ‘true’ democracy is.
- Even if we share a meaning of democracy or the rule of law, we may still disagree on how
they should be implemented;
o We can disagree about the implementation of democracy.
o Disagreement on the practical issues.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper marjandaanje1. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53340 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen