Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
18/19 Re-sit exam WITH answers
18/19 Re-sit exam WITH answers
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 1 van de 3 pagina's
Voorbeeld 1 van de 3 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Resit April 2019Question 1
(a) A dispute arises between A and B. A files a request for arbitration. A nominates professor X as
arbitrator. B files a short answer, in which it requests that C is joined in the arbitration. B and C do
not come to an agreement on the nomination of an arbitrator. Under the applicable arbitration rules
of the NAI, the parties are now provided with a list of potential arbitrators, from which the parties
may strike out the arbitrator(s) they deem unsuitable to serve as arbitrator. The list includes
professor X. None of the parties strikes out professor X, and the NAI appoints professor X as
arbitrator. After the rendering of the final award, B and C seek setting aside of the arbitral award for
professor X being not impartial and independent. After all, professor X was first nominated by party
A.
Discuss whether the request for setting aside is likely to be successful. Assume the Model Law and
the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules apply for the purposes of this question. (4 points)
The answer should contain the following elements:
A reasoned discussion of the duty – upon the penalty of loss of right – to invoke the alleged lack of
impartiality and independence within 15 days of becoming aware of the basis for such challenge (art
13 ML and art 11(1) UNCITRAL Rules, with reference to artt. 9 and 10) and consequently, the (limited)
odds of success of a request for setting aside under art. 34 ML (2(a)(iv) or 2(b)(ii)).
(b) C(laimant) and R(espondent) are in an arbitration proceedings conducted under the auspices of
the LCIA. The seat of the arbitration is London. R is of the opinion that the agreement to arbitrate on
the basis of which C has commenced the arbitration proceedings, is invalid. R’s counsel writes a letter
to the Secretary-General of the LCIA, requesting that the LCIA not appoint arbitrators in this case.
What would your response as Secretary-General of the LCIA be? Assume the Model Law applies. (3
points)
A reasoned discussion of the arbitrator’s right (and obligation) to assess their own competence under
article 16 Model Law.
(c) Assume that two parties have agreed on the following dispute settlement arrangement:
"In the event of any dispute arising out of or in connection with the present contract, the parties shall
first refer the dispute to mediation. All disputes arising out of or in connection with the present
contract shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of
Commerce by one or more arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules."
May a party that lacks faith in mediation proceed directly to arbitration? (3 points)
The answer must contain a reasoned discussion of the fact that this depends on the applicable law
and what are the possible outcomes. Also correct: a reasoned discussion of the enforceability of the
above clause under the Directive.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper iky_soad. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67096 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen