100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Part 3 -- Cultural and social evolution

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Geüpload op
29-01-2021
Geschreven in
2019/2020

This is a summary of part 3 Cultural and social evolution of Evolutionary Development. With all of my summaries for this course I passed it with an 7,7 !

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Cultural and social evolution
Evolution of stone tools and prehistoric art
Culture: a collection of artefacts (kunstproduct) made in a characteristic way at a
certain place and transmitted over a certain time period
Artefact: object from the environment modified to serve a certain purpose

Animals use materials to make artefacts (a nest) but their manufacture is purely
instinctual
o Chimpanzees use stones to crack nuts – but these stones are never shaped
or modified

Modification of an object to use it as a tool is typically human (this is not applicable
anymore – animals can do this also)

The fact that some animals use artefact does not mean they have culture because it
is only a part of culture. Do animals have culture?
Evidence for this:
1. Japanese macaques who clean sweet potatoes in the seawater and have
retained this habit since 1958
2. Chimpanzees use stones to throw away competitors – between chimpanzee
populations there are differences in the way they throw the stones

Stone cultures
1. Oldowan tools (mode 1) ± 2,5 Ma BP– Africa and eastern side
of Asia
a. Ascribed to Homo habilis
b. Simple hammer stones and flakes – unifacial
c. Homo habilis modified flint stones (vuurstenen) to make
hand axes, hammer stones, cutting tools and scrapers
(zager)
d. Evidence of the use of this tool: 1) flakes found 2) cut marks
on fossil bones indicating attempts to cut off meat – found 3,4
Ma BP in Ethiopia so this indicates that there is possible use
of stone tools before Oldowan culture (pre-Oldowan tools) +
pre-Oldowan tools also found 3,3 Ma BP in Kenia

So, could Australopithecus make stone tools? – yes
The hand of Australopithecus sediba has some primitive straits compared
to Homo sapiens but is suitable to make a “forceps” grip, necessary to
make tools

2. Acheulean tools (mode 2) ±1,5 Ma BP to 200 ka BP– Africa and
Europa later in Western Asia
a. Ascribed to Homo ergaster/erectus partly also to
Homo heidelbergensis
b. Industrially prepared pointed hand axes – bifacial
c. They are also called the “Swish army knife” of
prehistory

Movius line separates Acheulean from Oldowan

, 3. Mousterian tools (mode 3)
a. Ascribed to Neanderthal
b. Flat and pointed structures of various kind

4. Aurignacian tools (modes 4 and 5)
a. One of the many cultures of Homo sapiens
b. Sharp knife-like stones and microliths (small tools)




The stone age: period when tools are started to use
Neolithic: 10000 -- 1000 BP
Paleolithic
o Late: 40000 BP – 10000 BP
o Middle: 250000 BP – 40000 BP
o Early: 2,7 Ma BP – 250000 BP
The classification is based on stone cultures not on absolute dates and differs per
continent

The cultural revolution in Europe
40-30 ka BP: explosion of cultural expressions (stone tools,
decorations, cave paintings – ability for internal portrayal of the
external world)
Associated with the arrival of anatomically modern man (Cro-
magnon Man)

Homo sapiens
Cave paintings and art
o Lascaux caves in France: The Sistine chappel of prehistory –
must have served for better hunting for example Caves of
Altamira in Spain: 18.500-14.000 BP – famous for their
hunting scenes and polychrome paintings (veel kleuren)
o Venus figurines of Cro-magnon – may have been involved in
reproductive success

Some artefacts are not for rituals or success reproductive but for
pleasure or beauty
o Pierced shells in Blombos cave (South Africa;75.000 a BP) – used as beads of
a neckless
This indicates behaviour before the cultural explosion in Europe (So first in
Africa then in Europe

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 januari 2021
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
SAMENVATTING

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
biomedicalsciencesvu Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
692
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
337
Documenten
242
Laatst verkocht
9 maanden geleden

3,9

341 beoordelingen

5
128
4
115
3
58
2
6
1
34

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen