100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Adult Capacity in Medical Law £3.99
Add to cart

Study guide

Adult Capacity in Medical Law

 74 views  0 purchase

14 pages worth of notes containing lecture notes, summaries of academic literature and analysis of relevant cases. Considers the implication of adult capacity on the principle of autonomy, particularly with regards to the right to make irrational decisions. Relevant Legislation: Mental Capacity Act...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 15  pages

  • December 25, 2019
  • 15
  • 2019/2020
  • Study guide
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (19)
avatar-seller
topqualitynotes
Capacity I:
Medical Capacity Act
- Contrast people who don’t have the capacity to make decisions with the strong principle of autonomy
The principle of autonomy:
- Requirement of consent protects the principle of autonomy and bodily integrity
- Article 8 HRA: involves “a right to make important decisions about what happens to one’s body”
- Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789
o Lord Mustill
o “If the patient is capable of making a decision on whether to permit treatment, … his choice must be obeyed
even if on any objective view it is contrary to his best interests.”
- Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95,
o Lord Donaldson MR
 “the patient's right of choice exists whether the reasons for making that choice are rational, irrational,
unknown or even non-existent.”
o Staughton LJ:
 The right exists ‘even in circumstances where she is likely or even certain to die in the absence of
treatment.’
o Butler-Sloss LJ:
 “the decision does not have to be sensible, rational or well-considered.”
o British Medical Association:
 “it is well established in law and ethics that competent adults have the right to refuse any medical
treatment, even if that refusal results in their death’.
 Highlight individualistic right- having no consideration of the impact of the decision on her
dependents.
o Can create “a tension between a patient’s legal right to determine what is done to her
body, and her moral obligations to others”

- Glick questions whether the short-term autonomy of a distressed patient should be respected

o Distressed patients can make “hasty tragic decisions which they...regret”; since “a patient who is frightened and
stressed, may not be fully autonomous; his/her refusal should therefore be assigned less weight.”

o If a patient’s death could be avoided and “it is virtually certain that were he saved against his present protest he
would be grateful”, the law is prioritising short-term autonomy over long-term autonomy (‘The morality of
coercion' (2000) 26 Journal of Medical Ethics 393-5.)

Judging incapacity?
- Crucial:
o Without capacity, a patient can be treated without their consent. If capacity, cannot be treated without consent.

- Difference between adults and children is the burden of proof

o Doctors to establish that an adult does not have capacity; child to establish that she does have capacity

o Exception = when children want to make life-threatening decisions, “virtually impossible” to establish
competence

- Potential problem = “capacity is a question of degree”

o Gunn: “Capacity/incapacity...appear on a continuum which ranges from full capacity at one end to full
incapacity at the other end. ... The challenge is to choose the right level to set as the gateway to decision-
decision-making and respect for persons and autonomy.” ('The Meaning of Incapacity' (1994) 2 Medical Law
Review 8.)

- Less likely to question capacity if the patient has consented- bias?
- Status approach
o E.g. age-based categories- clear line.
- Functional approach
o Individualised assessment of decision-making ability.
 Can this individual make this particular decision.
- Which is more protective of autonomy?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller topqualitynotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added