FUR2601 Assignment
2 Semester 2 2024 -
DUE 27 September
2024
QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS
,FUR2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27 September 2024
Question 1
Describe The Role Of And How Extensively The Constitutional Court Used
International Law As Well As Foreign Law In The Interpretation Of The Rights In
The Bill Of Rights. (10 Marks)
The Role and Extent of International and Foreign Law in Interpreting the Bill
of Rights by the Constitutional Court
Role of International Law
1. Guiding Principles:
The Constitutional Court of South Africa is mandated by the Constitution to
consider international law when interpreting the Bill of Rights. Section 39(1)(b) of
the Constitution explicitly states that courts "must consider international law"
when interpreting the Bill of Rights. This provision underscores the importance of
aligning South Africa’s human rights jurisprudence with international human rights
standards.
2. Binding Treaties:
International treaties that South Africa is a party to, such as the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), provide binding obligations that
the Constitutional Court uses as benchmarks for interpreting rights within the Bill
of Rights.
3. Customary International Law:
Customary international law, which consists of practices and norms that have
achieved a general acceptance as law, also plays a critical role. The Court
, acknowledges these norms, especially where they concern fundamental human
rights recognized globally.
4. Soft Law:
While not binding, soft law instruments such as United Nations declarations,
resolutions, and guidelines also influence the Court's interpretation. These
instruments, though not legally binding, reflect the evolving standards and
expectations of the international community regarding human rights.
Extent of International Law Usage
1. Precedent Setting Cases:
The Constitutional Court has frequently cited international law in landmark cases.
For instance, in S v Makwanyane (1995), the Court referred extensively to
international human rights instruments to support its decision to abolish the death
penalty, highlighting the right to life and human dignity.
2. Comparative Analysis:
In Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa (2011), the Court used
international law to bolster its decision on the need for an independent anti-
corruption unit, referencing obligations under international conventions such as the
United Nations Convention against Corruption.
3. Development of Jurisprudence:
The Court has utilized international law to develop a robust and progressive human
rights jurisprudence. This approach helps ensure that South African law remains
dynamic and responsive to global human rights trends.
Role of Foreign Law
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller msmartie11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R46,59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.