100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary EU law - steps necessary in answering (exam) question, including brief summaries €8,29
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary EU law - steps necessary in answering (exam) question, including brief summaries

 34 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

This document provides a step-by-step model for answering (exam) questions. It contains relevant case law, provisions, and explanations.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 19  pagina's

  • 26 juni 2021
  • 19
  • 2019/2020
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (8)
avatar-seller
fleurdonders
Ch 1: introduction EU
Ch 2: development of EU
Ch 3: EU’s political institutions
Lecture 1
-

Lecture 2
 Principle of conferral: EU has competence to act
 Principle of subsidiarity: action of MS insufficient to achieve certain purpose
o Subsidiarity test (when shall the Union act?) p. 112
 Principle not applicable in areas of Union’s exclusive competences, so
there must be no action in areas where the Union enjoys exclusive
competence (art. 2(1) and 3 TFEU list of exclusive competences)
 The objective of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved
by MS
 By reason of scale or effects of the proposed action, the objective can
be better achieved at Union level, in other words, the Union action
would provide added value over action by MS acting individually
 Principle of proportionality: action of EU must be limited to what is necessary to
achieve objectives of treaties. Content and form of action must be in keeping with
aim pursued
o Trailers: regulation is suitable to reach the goal proposed. Measures must be
necessary in the sense that less restrictive measures aren’t available or
wouldn’t be effective

 Protocol NO. 2 on the Application of the Principle of Subsidiarity and Proportionality

Ch 5: legislation in EU. (3 principles)
Ch 6: effect of EU law in national legal systems (direct and indirect effect)

, Ch 6
Tutorial 1: Direct Effect
 Direct effect Treaty provisions (Van Gend en Loos), transposition not necessary
o (primary law)  individual vs. MS (vertical) OR (horizontal) p. 16 notes p. 147
and further
 TEST  to produce direct effect, provision must include an obligation for MS that is:
o 1. Clear
o 2. Unconditional (MS has no reservation)
o 3. Implementation measures not required

 Regulations direct effect (horizontal and vertical) p. 151 & notes p. 22
o Provisions precise and clear
o No implementation required

 Can directives have a direct effect? YES (Van Duyn v Home Office) and (Becker) p. 17
notes 
o vertical direct effect!! (no horizontal direct effect, directives binding on MS
(Marshall)
 TEST  individuals can invoke provisions included in a Directive against a MS when
(Becker):
o 1. Subject matter/provision sufficiently precise and unconditional
o 2. Deadline expired and no (correct) implementation measures at national
level
o 3. Provisions define right which individuals are able to assert against the State
(aka vertical application)
o (confer rights to individuals? P. 83 notes)
 Van Duyn
o 1. Rule of behavior is clear
o 2. Deadline to implement Directive is expired (Ratti)
o 3. MS did not implement the Directive….
o 4. … or partially/incorrectly implemented (Becker)

 Directives can have direct effect against State, even when it’s acting as employer (in
its private function) (Foster) (zie summary van vera)
An MS which has not adopted the implementing measures required by
 Estoppel argument (Marshall, Becker, Ratti) directive within prescribed period may not plead, as against individuals, its
own failure to perform the obligation which the directive entails (Ratti)

 Indirect effect EU law: EU law sources, which don’t have direct effect, can still be
indirectly invoked within a national legal system (Von Colson).
o Duty of consistent interpretation/indirect effect: duty of all national bodies
to interpret all national law in light of and in conformity with EU law
o Duty of sincere cooperation (art. 4(3) TFEU)

Principle of primacy: EU law prevails over national law p. 83 notes (Costa) (Simmenthal)
1. ‘sui generis’ legal order
2. MS permanent limitation of sovereignty
3. EU law same effect in all legal order
4. National judges disapply national norms and apply EU law

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper fleurdonders. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,29. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€8,29
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd