100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Assignment 3 Psychological Communication 2: Professional Skills Year 2.3 Psychology €4,49
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  4.  
  5. Psychological Communication 2: Professional Skills (P_BPSG2PV)

Essay

Assignment 3 Psychological Communication 2: Professional Skills Year 2.3 Psychology

1 beoordeling
 7 keer verkocht

This is the third assignment for the course Psychological Communication 2: Professional Skills of the second year of psychology. This assignment concerns the interview about "breaking bad news". I received an 8.0 for this assignment. You can use this assignment as an example for your own assignment...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 5  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 1 juli 2021
  • 5
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Onbekend
  • 8-9

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Alle documenten voor dit vak (7)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: claireniamorrissey • 2 jaar geleden

Verkoper

avatar-seller
mandyrose

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Running head: REFLECTIVE REPORT: BREAKING BAD NEWS 1




Reflective Report: Breaking Bad News
Mandy Roosendaal, 2663488

Psychological Interview Skills 2: Professional Skills
Paula Francisca Cortés Montenegro, Group 33
Word count: 963
31-01-2021

, REFLECTIVE REPORT: BREAKING BAD NEWS 2


Breaking Bad News
I opened the interview and then immediately told Sharon the bad news. She was very
disappointed to hear that we would not be continuing our sessions. I showed understanding by
reflecting Sharon’s emotions. Then, I asked Sharon if she was ready to talk about possible
solutions and she said yes. She explained that she did still want help, even though she would
have to find someone else. We agreed to find a specialist together. Sharon expressed that it was
very important to her to find someone with whom she has a good match and who does not have a
long waiting list. I agreed that I would try to help her find someone who meets these
requirements. I ended the conversation with a summary.
Based on the feedback from the simulation, I created two learning goals. The first is to
avoid using lengthy explanations. The second is to avoid expressing guilt.
https://youtu.be/7g-nEDz61OM
Observations
At 0.29, I started explaining why Sharon and I would not be continuing our sessions.
Looking back, I think this explanation should have been shorter. It could have ended at 0.45,
after I said: “you have talked to me, last time, about your issues with food and weight, and it
appeared to me that you have quite some severe problems. I think it would be better for you to go
to a specialist than to stay with me.” After that, I went on to explain why I made this decision,
and Sharon responded with: “oh my god, yeah, well, I am just really disappointed.” Her response
indicated that she did not really know what to do with all the information I just gave her. I could
have waited with this explanation until Sharon asked for it. This way, it might have been easier
for her to take in the information, and she could have decided for herself when she was ready for
more information. In future interviews, I would like to remind myself to not give all the reasons
for a decision straight away. If I notice that I am about to say the word “because”, I know that is
where I should stop and wait for the interviewee to respond and ask further questions.
I did achieve my second learning goal. In the simulation, I tended to choose the answer
options in which I apologised and expressed feelings of guilt. This way, I shifted the focus
towards my own feelings instead of the feelings of the receiver of bad news. However, I did not
do this at all during the interview with Sharon and instead focused on her feelings by reflecting
them and showing understanding. Afterwards, she told me that I made her feel heard. This

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper mandyrose. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€4,49  7x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd