100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Building Entrepreneurial Teams (BET) - Literature (ELS-51306) €2,99
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Building Entrepreneurial Teams (BET) - Literature (ELS-51306)

 14 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Summary of the mandatory literature for the exam of the course ELS-51306: Building Entrepreneurial Teams. This is a course that can be part of the MSc Track Entrepreneurship (E-track). It contains a summary of the following scientific literature: 1) Hülsheger et al., (2009), 2) Schjoedt & Kraus (2...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 12  pagina's

  • 13 juli 2021
  • 12
  • 2020/2021
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (2)
avatar-seller
jonathanvdb
ELS-51306 Building Entrepreneurial Teams
Literature Summary

P1: Hülsheger et al. (2009)
Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Spanning Three Decades of Research
Perspective applied to team learning: psychological, sociological and innovation.
Main conclusions: table 3
o Team process variables conducive to innovation: external and internal
communication; vision; support for innovation; task orientation; cohesion.
o Team input variables somewhat conducive to innovation: goal interdependence; job
relevant diversity; team size.
o Relationships are moderated by measurement level and measurement method.
How does article help to reach better understanding of teams: importance of external weak
ties.
Relationship to IPO model: focus on Input, Process and Outcome
o Input: goal interdependence. Team input variables have small and variable
relationships
o Process: communication, especially external communication. Team process variables
have substantial relationships.
o Measurement: measurement techniques should match the level interested in. Self-
perceived measures are less reliable

The elements required for a team to function the best in an innovative way:
- Working climate is open for change and error friendly
- Shared, visionary goals
- Interdependence in reaching goals
- Internal and external communication

Main conclusions (table 3):




1

, P2: Schjoedt & Kraus (2009)
Entrepreneurial teams: definition and performance factors
Perspective applied to team learning:
Main conclusions: ‘strong association between higher corporate success and team-created
ventures.’
How does article help to reach better understanding of teams:
Relationship to IPO model:

Definition entrepreneurial team: ‘two or more persons who have an interest, both financial
and otherwise, in and commitment to a venture’s future and success; whose work is
interdependent in the pursuit of common goals and venture success; who are accountable to
the entrepreneurial team and for the venture; who are considered to be at the executive level
with executive responsibility in the early phases of the venture, including founding and
prestart up; and who are seen as a social entity by themselves and by others.’

Team homogeneity and team heterogeneity:
- Homogeneous teams in stable environments: less conflict -> groupthink
- Heterogeneous teams in turbulent environments: more different ideas and more
conflict -> takes time.
Challenge: finding the right balance between team homogeneity and heterogeneity.

P3: Decuyper at al. (2010)
Grasping the dynamic complexity of team
learning
Perspective applied to team learning:
psychological
Main conclusions: teams are dynamic and
complex. Table 2. Process is connected to
entrepreneurial learning by doing -> team
activity.
How does article help to reach better
understanding of teams: difference groups and
teams
Relationship to IPO model: focus on Input,
Process and Outcome.
o Input: (sub)system and suprasystem
o Process: boundary crossing, team
reflexivity; team activity
o Outcome: adaptive, generative or transformative learning

Research aim: answering the current lack of integration by developing a theoretical
framework for team learning that integrates existing theoretical conceptions and empirical
findings. Also, discovering factors that influence team learning.

Conclusions: team learning is ‘a compilation of team-level processes that circularly generate
change or improvement for teams, team members and organizations.’ It is dynamic and
complex.




2

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jonathanvdb. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,99
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd