100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Economics of Regulation - Lecture & Literature summary €15,99   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Economics of Regulation - Lecture & Literature summary

 60 keer bekeken  5 keer verkocht

Summary of lectures and literature for Economics of Regulation (Leiden University - Master Public Administration). My grade for the exam was a 8.5. I recommend studying this document and making all the assignments. The summary also includes important points from the assignments.

Voorbeeld 3 van de 21  pagina's

  • 27 juni 2022
  • 21
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (3)
avatar-seller
hsahin97
Summary Economics of Regulation Retake


Week 1: Efficiency
Market failure
- Competitive market is pareto efficient.
- Market failure is necessary (but not sufficient!) economic justification for state
intervention.
- Market failure:
1. Market power: price-setters, charge high price that exceeds marginal opportunity
costs of production. Therefore, consumers demand less of the product than is
efficient. It brings X-efficiency (= excessive production costs)
2. Externality: losses or benefits on third parties
3. Public goods (non-rivalrous & non-excludable). Dikes, national defense.
4. Imperfect information: asymmetric information causes two other problems:
a. Adverse selection: one party can’t distinguish between 2 or more actions which
have different risks/costs, and therefore makes a choice based on average value
of these.
b. Moral hazard: risky behavior increases due to prospect of insurance.

Non-market failure
- Market failure approach based on assumption that regulatory intervention is costless.
- But regulation is also costly and generates distortions and inefficiencies. à Coase.
- Economists exaggerate extent of market failure and ignore costs that government
intervention brings with them. Markets can sometimes fix themselves.
- Inefficiency of regulation often due to mismatch between regulatory objective and
regulatory instrument.
- 4 categories of costs:
1. Rule-making costs: costs of designing and implementing legal standards
2. Enforcement costs: costs of enforcing the standards
3. Compliance costs: costs that are imposed on regulated industry
4. Harm costs: social costs imposed by regulatory offences

Welfare
- Welfare = everything that humans value (consumption, leisure time, environmental
quality)
- First welfare theorem = in absence of market failures, competitive equilibrium is pareto-
efficient. However, conditions for competitive market don’t hold in real life. And pareto-
efficiency doesn’t say anything about fairness or redistribution.
- Economics = decision making under scarcity; making best use of resources

Equilibrium
- Nash equilibrium = each player chooses their best option given the expected option of
the other.
- Market clearing price = equilibrium price where there is no excess demand/supply.
- Competitive equilibrium = all buyers & sellers are price-takers, and the quantity
supplied is equal to the quantity demanded.




1

,Summary Economics of Regulation Retake


Competitive market
- Used as bench mark. It’s ideal market because:
1. Property rights well defined and secure
2. Consumers and suppliers are price takers
3. Perfect information
4. No entry/exit barriers
- If these assumptions hold, equilibrium price reflets social
marginal costs of producing.
- Competitive market is efficient because it reflects the social marginal costs of
producing
Ø Qs = social marginal costs
Ø CS & PS = good proxy for welfare and competitive market maximizes this surplus
without any government intervention.
- Deadweight loss = loss of total surplus relative to pareto-efficient allocation (equilibrium
situation)




Efficiency
- Three kinds of efficiency:
1. Exchange efficiency
2. Allocative efficiency
3. Production efficiency

Exchange efficiency
- Edgeworth box = how given quantities of 2 products are divided between 2 individuals.
- Exchange efficiency = only looks at preferences
- Indifference curve = all combinations of apples + bread that give the same utility.
- Equilibrium 0 not efficient outcome because there are opportunities for trade à can see
from slopes because slopes are not the same.
- Equilibrium 1 is pareto improvement à Bruno stays on same curve, so level of utility is
still the same. Angela better off because on higher indifference curve à traded some
apples for bread
Ø Slopes (MRS) for both now the same and therefore pareto-efficiency in equilibrium
1.




2

, Summary Economics of Regulation Retake




Production efficiency
- Production efficiency = looks at production function
- Production function = amount of output that can be produced by amount/combination
of input.
- Marginal product = extra amount of output if input increased by one unit.
- Diminishing returns = use of additional unit results in smaller increase in output.
- Time (scarce resource) used to produce bread. Input increases à output increases à
decreases
- Opportunity costs = input in A could have been used in
production B. Best alternative use of resource.
Ø To get more free time, forgo opportunity of getting
higher grade).
- Production possibilities frontier/feasibility frontier = how
much of every product can be produced if all inputs most
efficiently used. Inside the frontier is not efficient, on is
efficient and out is unfeasible.
- MRT = giving up output product 2 for little but more of
output of product 1
- Production must be on the frontier to be efficient
- But which point to choose on the frontier? à therefore we need preferences =
allocative efficiency

Allocative efficiency
- Aggregate indifference curve tells us which combination of output to produce.
- Best point: MRS = MRT.

Pareto
- Two kinds of efficiency
1. Pareto efficiency = welfare of an individual can’t be improved without making
someone else worse off à very strict definition, therefore Hicks.
n Pareto efficiency flows from 3 assumptions: price-taking, complete contract, no
effect on others
2. Pareto improvement = change that makes at least one individual better off, without
reducing welfare of others.
- Pareto criterion based on 2 value judgements:
1. Individual is best judge of his/her own welfare
2. Welfare of society depend on welfare of individuals that comprise it.
- Since most policies have winners and losers, pareto not really applicable to real life.

Hicks-Kaldor


3

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper hsahin97. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €15,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 72042 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€15,99  5x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen