College aantekeningen
International Law and Human Rights Lecture Notes (Lectures 1-11) - GRADE 8,0
Notes on the lectures from the course (2023) International Law and Human Rights. INCLUDES notes from lectures 1-11 (Total: 32 pages).
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 32 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 32 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
4 beoordelingen
Door: lidewij9 • 5 maanden geleden
Door: giacomoef • 5 maanden geleden
Thank you for the review! Hope the exams went well.
Door: 2002amj • 1 jaar geleden
Door: giacomoef • 1 jaar geleden
Thank you for the positive review!
Door: marawankhalil1 • 1 jaar geleden
Door: tariksmaaili • 1 jaar geleden
Door: giacomoef • 1 jaar geleden
Thank you for the review!
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Notes on the lectures from the course (2023) International Law and Human Rights. INCLUDES notesfrom lectures 1-11 (Total: 32 pages).
International Law and Human Rights Lecture Notes (Lectures 1-11)
Table of Contents
I. History & Theories of IL 1
Lecture 1: International Law & the Study of Politics 1
Lecture 2: IL & IR Theory 2
Lecture 3: The History of IL (I) 4
Lecture 4: The History of IL (II) 7
II. Core Concepts & Institutions of IL 10
Lecture 5: Sources of IL 10
Lecture 6: Subjects of IL 13
Lecture 7: International Courts 16
III. Issues in International Law and Human Rights 20
Lecture 8: IL on the Use of Force 20
Lecture 9: International Humanitarian Law 23
Lecture 10: International Human Rights Law 26
Lecture 11: International Criminal Law 28
, 1
I. History & Theories of IL
Lecture 1: International Law & the Study of Politics
What is international law? Is it law?
International Law (IL): The body of rules/practices that states consider binding in their mutual
relations.
➔ Law can be understood as:
◆ A set of rules.
◆ A professional practice.
◆ An independent social phenomenon.
◆ An epiphenomenal reflection of power.
➔ Is IL really law?
◆ Compared to municipal law (domestic law), IL has many distinctive features →
traditionally rejected the idea that IL is law.
➔ Traditionally, IL:
◆ Is based on voluntary adhesion (in most cases).
◆ Has weak or NO enforcement mechanisms (although increasing legalisation?).
◆ Rules are few & vague (is this changing?).
If Law:
● Sovereign command backed by the threat of sanctions (Austin) → IL is probably NOT law.
● About a rule identifying which rules are law (Hart’s rule of recognition) → IL = law?
Does the expansion of the definition of law dilute the distinctive nature & authority of legal rules? If
the following are ‘law’, what is NOT law?
● “Hard Law”: Law traditionally understood by most people = form of written & legally binding
treaties.
● “Soft Law”: Variety of non-binding normatively worded instruments used in contemporary IR
by States & IOs → can be suggestions.
The Study of Politics & IL: An Uneasy Relationship
IL has always been studied as part of the study IR = uneasy relationship:
● Originating from WWI’s end to WWII, IR had a strong legalist bent.
● IL was viewed as a key to securing world peace → Kellogg–Briand Pact (1928) that
“outlawed” war.
➔ “It is probably the case that almost all nations observe almost all principles of
international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time.”
● HOWEVER, the experience of WWII provoked a breach between the 2 disciplines.
In the post-war era, international lawyers: IR scholars, meanwhile:
○ Emphasised IL’s separation from ○ Ignored IL, even when it overlapped
politics. with their topics of interest.
○ Focused on studying specific legal rules ○ Spoke of “regimes”, “norms”,
& decision-making processes “institutions” > discussing “law”.
, 2
(“doctrinal scholarship”).
● Nevertheless, IL underwent explosive growth → key international
institutions/treaties/regimes (e.g., UN, GATT/WTO, EU, etc) were born after WWII.
➔ Does this prove IL’s resilience? Or its derivative status from power relations?
● Post-Cold War, there has been a partial rapprochement between IL & IR.
➔ HOWEVER the study of IL qua politics still takes a distinct approach from the study of
IL qua law.
Lecture 2: IL & IR Theory
1. Realism
Realists: Most critical of IL’s potential to constrain state behaviour = insistence on compliance with
legal rules without great power buy-in may even make war more likely.
➔ IL = epiphenomenal → bad product of state self-interest (instinct of the exercise of power =
NO autonomy).
➔ Law has a moderating function within states = hierarchy of authority & enforcement.
◆ HOWEVER, NO hierarchy/institutions exist outside = law CANNOT deliver promises.
➔ State compliance with IL ≠ prove that it is effective.
◆ Effectiveness = law can make states act in ways contrary to their self-interest.
◆ Compliance = mere happenstance when cost-benefit calculus is preferable.
➔ Realist approaches to IL:
◆ Classical Realists (Keenan, Morgenthau): Still willing to talk about IL, only to
disparage it.
◆ Structural (Neo-) Realists (Waltz): Do NOT bother. States are like units existing under
structural anarchy → nothing else really matters (certainly NOT law).
◆ Most realists are willing to acknowledge that IL can have important functions BUT
NOT that it has autonomous explanatory power for state behaviour:
● Steinberg on IL:
○ “May be Pareto-improving” → make transactions more efficient.
○ “Create incentives and opportunities for weaker states to change [...]
in ways favoured by powerful states.”
○ “Facilitate cooperation among powerful states in their relations with
weaker states.”
○ “Generate information flows for powerful states.”
Questions challenging the REALIST perspective:
● How do we explain the explosive growth of IL (“legalisation” of IR) in numerical terms but also in
terms of scope?
● How do explain instances where strong states are constrained by law/weaker states use law
successfully against strong states?
● What about the role of law within states in terms of shaping foreign policy preferences?
2. Liberal Institutionalism
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper giacomoef. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 73918 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen