100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
College aantekeningen Adolescent Development Exam 3 €6,49
In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

College aantekeningen Adolescent Development Exam 3

 27 keer bekeken  4 keer verkocht

Volledige collegeaantekeningen voor het derde tentamen van Adolescent Development.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 44  pagina's

  • 6 april 2023
  • 44
  • 2022/2023
  • College aantekeningen
  • Judith dubas
  • Alle colleges
Alle documenten voor dit vak (57)
avatar-seller
fvz0708
LECTURE 9: ALCOHOL USE AND DELINQUENCY
PART 1: ALCOHOL USE AND DELINQUENCY AMONG
YOUTH
Do the Dutch drink?
-  Not specific for the Dutch only, other youth also
- Underage drinking (Van Dorsselaer et al., 2016; 2019)
o 13-year old → monthly drinking = 11% / 8.8%
o 15-year old drinkers* → binge drinking = 69.9% / 70.8%
 *monthly drinkers
- What are the risks of alcohol for youth?
o Physical and mental
 EX risky sexual behavior, more prone to addiction
o Relation between drinking alcohol and violence

Are they delinquent?
- Self-reported criminal behavior (at least one delinquent act in last 12
months)
o →12-17 years
 2010: 38%
 2015: 35%
 2020: 36.6%
o Relatively stable
- 15% less reporting in 2020 compared to 2010
- Most prevalent delinquent acts:
o Violent acts (21%)
o Threatening (19%)
o Vandalism (13%)
- Fewer registered minor suspects (CBS, 2021)


PART 2: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
ALCOHOL USE AND DELINQUENCY
Shared similarities
1. Interrelated
o = relation between alcohol use and delinquency
 Correlations and co-occurrence
o 10 years: r = .16 - .18 (Mason et al., 2009)
o 12-15 years: r = .43 (Van Nieuwenhuizen et al., 2009)
o 12-16 years: in 25 European countries (Gatti et al., 2013)
o  The more (serious) offences (like violence, property) 
more prone to alcohol use
o Longitudinal predictions
 (e.g. Ellickson et al., 2003; Mason et al., 2009; Resnick et
al., 2004 )
 Most studies find no predictive effect of alcohol use on
delinquency, whereas delinquency mostly is a significant

, predictor of alcohol use (Chao, Li, McGue, 2017; Turner,
Danebek, Skarner, 2018;)
2. Peak in adolescence
o More alcohol use and more delinquency in adolescence
3. Predictor of other risk behaviors (e.g., drug use, risky sex)
4. Shared underlying mechanisms (e.g., self-control, social context,
family)
o What causes what is difficult to say because of other factors
o These factors predict both behavior
 Important
5. Decline in recent years (and now stabilization)
o Life-time alcohol use and past month alcohol use (underage)
both declined over time
o Some sort of stabilization the last years, but still declines a bit

Differences
1. Development
o More alcohol use, less involvement in delinquent behavior
through the years
2. Across gender
o Long time, boys more drinking than girls
 BUT nowadays between boys and girls the same
 Boys a little bit more involved in binge drinking
o Boys are more involved in delinquency than girls, no matter
what age
3. Representation ethnic minorities
o Delinquency
 Higher representation of minority groups
o Alcohol use
 Lower representation of minority groups
4. Behavior-specific  General parenting
o Age restriction
 16 to 18 for alcohol use
 BUT for delinquency there is no age restriction
 BECAUSE it is not accepter
o Alcohol-specific rules/communication
 Which rules do parents set to postpone the onset of
drinking or lower the level of drinking
 EX you can drink 1 beer on saturday
 For delinquency this is not the case
 It is always forbidden
o Control vs. support

, 
 Authoritative  most favorable
o Kids least likely to engage in alcohol use and
delinquency
 Neglectful  bad, no support from parents




-
o If we have specific rules on alcohol use  how does it
influence the use of other substances
o Mediated by monthly drinking

Parents and adolescent drinking
- Parents let their kids try their alcoholic drink
o BUT they do not invite their kids to steal something for
example


PART 3: PREVENTION OF ALCOHOL USE IN
STUDENTS (PAS)
Parent intervention
- Aim: strict parenting (rules and attitudes about alcohol)
o (Orebro prevention program, Koutakis et al., 2008)
1. Presentation at parents meeting (3x)
o First parents meeting new schoolyear
o Brief: 15 minutes
2. Consensus building parents
3. Information leaflet

Student intervention

, - Aim: increase self-control and healthy attitudes about alcohol
o (Healthy School and Drugs Program, Cuijpers et al., 2002)
1. Four digital interactive lessons (e-learning) in class
o Interactive assignments
o Individual and group
o Attractive lay-out
2. Hard-copy booster in year two

Study design




-
o 3 experimental conditions (interventions)

Early adolescence
- 12 to 16 years
o Entry secondary school (12 years old)
o Legal drinking age (16 years old)

Who participated?
- 19 secondary schools
- > 3000 adolescents and parents
- 12 to 16 years
- Self-report questionnaires
-  Significant difference only between combined intervention and
control
o ALSO when they were allowed to drink (16 years old)

CONCLUSION: Adolescents AND parents should be targeted
 How?
- Mediators
o Self-control (adolescents)
 13 items (Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone, 2004)
 E.g. “I do certain things that are bad for me, if they are
fun” (alpha = .74)
o Rules about alcohol (adolescents and parents)
 10 items (Van der Vorst et al., 2005)
 E.g. “I am allowed to drink alcohol on a party with my
friends” (alpha = .90)
o Attitude about alcohol (adolescents and parents)
o “A person of my age should be allowed to….”
- Student intervention
o Aim: increase self-control and healthy attitudes about alcohol

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper fvz0708. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 48298 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49  4x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd