Samenvatting
Summary Class notes for philosophy of science
- Instelling
- Tilburg University (UVT)
Includes class notes and book. Does not include practical information.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 29 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 29 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Lecture 1: Philosophy of Science, Epistemology- This course is a reflection on whether psychology is a science
- Knowledge (epistemology) → philosophy of science → critical thinking
Philosophy of Science
- philosophical/critical thinking on what science is, does, how it generates knowledge
- Whats the difference between science and pseudoscience
- Science = ?
Why philosophy for psychologists?
- Psychology is a science?
- Need to be able to explain why/why not as an academic - requires knowledge about what has been
historically considered science
- Need skills to reflect, and argument on one’s views
- Replication crisis in psychology - science usually publishes only positive results, neds philosophical
critical reflection knowledge and skills
- Character building (somehow this builds my character)
- ⇒ better psychologists, scientists, citizens → understanding, then advancing society
- Most people are in psychology because they want to help people
Epistemology = theory of knowledge
- 3 epistemological questions
- What is certain K?
- How can we justify K?
- What is the source of K?
- 2 traditional views
- Rationalism = real k comes from ratio = reason
- Empiricism = real k comes from using sensory experience
- What are we certain of?
- Skepticism = Socrates = we can never know anything (i can only know how much i don’t know)
- Perhaps the conclusion must even be that we do not know anything at all, and never will
- Socrates is convicted to death because he was bad for society :(
- Rationalism = real k stands from our reason (general claim)
- ASSOCIATED claim: there is innate knowledge (nativism)
- Plato (radical rationalist)
- To learn is to remember = anamnesis
- There is no new knowledge, you do not learn anything, only remember
- Why did he claim this? Plato believed in reincarnation
- Plato believed that before you were born, you had all the real k, and then you lose it all
because birth is a traumatic experience
- Episteme = k of how the things are
- Vs Doxa = opinion about how the things are
- K = justified and true belief = you need to be able to explain to, say, a skeptic, how you
know that you know something
- A skeptic does not make claims about the world, says any claim is doxa, not episteme
- Plato responds to Heraclitis: Panta rhei = the world we perceive with our senses changes
constantly, then nothing is, and we can only acquire doxa, not episteme
- Plato does not want skepticism - like socrates he did not believe in the gods, but he
believed that k exists
- Cave Allegory
, - Ideas, forms exist apart from us in a world of Ideas/Forms
- The soul is akin to those ideas, imprisoned in our body where it can only perceive
the shadows of real things
- acquiring knowledge is to remember these ideas = anamnesis
- Thus behind every changing part of our world there is a higher order, not changing
idea/form
- Meno - socrates puts words in his mouth, this kind of rationalism is very extreme;
- descartes had a weaker version
- Empiricism: general claim = source of k is experiencing gained through sensory perception - common
sense view: of you want to know how something is, you have to sense it
- Greek Empeira
- Latin Experienta
- Associated claim: if all k comes from experience via perception, there is no innate knowledge
- Empiricist is not empirical, there is a difference: empiricist is the opposite of rationalist, the view
that knowledge stems from sensory experience
- Empirical = scientific method, k and experience to infer conclusions about the world; empirical
evidence gathered through observations or experiments, opposite of purely hypothetical
- Aristotle - plato’s student, but disagreed with the 2 worlds (one real and one of ideas) : there is
only one world, the one that we can perceive with our senses
- Implies a rejection of innate ideas = tabula rasa man
- Founder of lyceum, talked while walking - peripateo in greek
- Peripatetic principles = nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the senses
- Aquinas^
- Key of aristotle’s empiricism is sensory perception, but his empiricism does have
some rationalist elements in his empiricist epistemology
- Universal concepts:
- Plato: idea chair is an entity in the world of ideas
- Aristotle rejects - only the individual chair exists, no world of ideas
- Concrete → universal via Induction (epagoge)
- Induction is conclusion based on observation of some cases
- Problem with induction - one observation alone cannot tell that the abstract
general proposition is true - correlation not causation → induction is only the first
step, needs
- Intuitive induction = understanding, using the intellectual capacity of the mind
(nous), that abstractions are necessary truths = rationalistic element
- Thus, aristotle find a general statement, and is not very critical toward it because
he had established its trueness via intuitive induction
- Aristotle in the Middle Ages
- The catholic church had a lot of power
- Issues about k and reality were resolved either via Bible or Aristotle
- 2 paths to the truth:
- Revelation
- Use of good sense (like Aristotle, even though he was a pagan??)
- Thomas Aquinas tried to unite Christian teachings and pagan ideas of Aristotle (‘the
philosopher’)
- THeory of matter and form example
- Matter = potentially something
- Shape/form makes the actual thing
- = process of creation and decay, ever changing forms of life
- Aquinas argued that God has put this process of creation and decay in motion, Aristotle’s
unmoved mover (=the first cause)
, - This means that aristotle = bible, so you can’t argue against aristotle because that is
attacking the bible
- Aristotle view on experiments was that you don't need them because they can’t teach us
about the natural world
- Experiments = heresy = death
- Why did Aristotle have these views?
- He used observation - had classifications of plants and animals
- Manipulation = world goes against the natural ways of things and as such we do not learn
anything about the natural world
- Middle ages: both philosophy and science (they were the same thing back then because of
Aristotle) came more and less to a halt
- Aristotle needed to be rejected to advance the philosophy of science and science itself
Lecture 2: Epistemology of francis bacon, Rene descartes etc
Francis Bacon New Method
- Politician, which allowed him to question aristotle (without gettting in trouble with the inquisition
- The new method
- Abandon epistemic prejudices
- Persistent epistomological biases (idols, false conceptions) that prevent us from acquiring
knowledge - you think you know, but you don’t
- Idols = of tribe, cave, marketplace, theatre = BIASES
- Idola tibus = typically human thinking mistakes - like visual illusions
- Seeing order and regularity where there is none - 10 people are white, so all people must
be white (wrong use of induction)
- Search for confirmation = confirmation bias
- Seeing ths un go down (but it is actually the earth rotating
- Sailors trust in the power of prayer = god is the idol of the tribe
- Idola specus (cave) = idols that we have because we belong to a certain group)
- Extreme conservatism - thinking the good old days were the best ever; but extreme
preference for the new should also be avoided
- Idola fori (marketplace) = ew can talk about something, so we assume that it is real - like destiny,
luck, coincidence
- We can have words that refer to things that don’t realy exist
- Idola theatri = prejudices due to the authorities saying they are true (like ancient philosophical
schools
- Use empirical method - observation and experiments
- Francis bacon experimented on himself whether opium would prolong his life
- (like aristotle) use induction, but differently from aristotle
- Induction = perception and understanding (rationalistic element)
- Goos science = observation + rational inference
Bacon vs Aristotle
- Induction
- But aristotle was wrong acc to Bacon bc he doesn’t take induction seriously
- Aristotle failed to inquire whether his general claim holds true in other place, and bacon sought disconfirming
evidence in london
Rene Descartes Rationalism
- He wanted certain knowledge, without accepting plato’s theory of anamnesis of world of forms
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper flaviastoia. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52928 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen