100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Self-Study Questions Chapter 3 & 4 with Solutions Chris Brooks - 3rd Edition €2,99   In winkelwagen

Antwoorden

Self-Study Questions Chapter 3 & 4 with Solutions Chris Brooks - 3rd Edition

7 beoordelingen
 2996 keer bekeken  12 keer verkocht

Here are the exercises from Chapter 3 and 4 together with their solutions.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 10  pagina's

  • 23 november 2017
  • 10
  • 2017/2018
  • Antwoorden
  • Onbekend
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alle documenten voor dit vak (15)

7  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: niekpoel • 3 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: emefrancispuc • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: endrejoreite • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: louisabetter • 5 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: 1234567893 • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: maher_kamra • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: nikitamacmurray • 6 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
claudiughiuzan
Self-study questions Chapter 3
1. (a) Why does OLS estimation involve taking vertical deviations of the points to the line rather than
horizontal distances?

(b) Why are the vertical distances squared before being added together?

(c) Why are the squares of the vertical distances taken rather than the absolute values?

1. (a) The use of vertical rather than horizontal distances relates to the idea that the explanatory
variable, x, is fixed in repeated samples, so what the model tries to do is to fit the most
appropriate value of y using the model for a given value of x. Taking horizontal distances would
have suggested that we had fixed the value of y and tried to find the appropriate values of x.



(b) When we calculate the deviations of the points, yt, from the fitted values, ŷt , some points
will lie above the line (yt > ŷt ) and some will lie below the line (yt < ŷt ). When we calculate
the residuals ( û t = yt – ŷt ), those corresponding to points above the line will be positive and
those below the line negative, so adding them would mean that they would largely cancel out.
In fact, we could fit an infinite number of lines with a zero average residual. By squaring the
residuals before summing them, we ensure that they all contribute to the measure of loss and
that they do not cancel. It is then possible to define unique (ordinary least squares) estimates
of the intercept and slope.


(c) Taking the absolute values of the residuals and minimising their sum would certainly also
get around the problem of positive and negative residuals cancelling. However, the absolute
value function is much harder to work with than a square. Squared terms are easy to
differentiate, so it is simple to find analytical formulae for the mean and the variance.



2. Explain, with the use of equations, the difference between the sample regression function and the
population regression function.



2. The population regression function (PRF) is a description of the model that is thought to be
generating the actual data and it represents the true relationship between the variables. The
population regression function is also known as the data generating process (DGP). The PRF
embodies the true values of  and , and for the bivariate model, could be expressed as



y t    xt  u t


Note that there is a disturbance term in this equation. In some textbooks, a distinction is drawn
between the PRF (the underlying true relationship between y and x) and the DGP (the process
describing the way that the actual observations on y come about).

, The sample regression function, SRF, is the relationship that has been estimated using the
sample observations, and is often written as



yˆ t  ˆ  ˆxt


Notice that there is no error or residual term in the equation for the SRF: all this equation
states is that given a particular value of x, multiplying it by  and adding  will give the
model fitted or expected value for y, denoted ŷ . It is also possible to write



y t  ˆ  ˆxt  uˆ t


This equation splits the observed value of y into two components: the fitted value from the
model, and a residual term. The SRF is used to infer likely values of the PRF. That is the
estimates  and  are constructed, for the sample data.




3. What is an estimator? Is the OLS estimator superior to all other estimators? Why or why not?

3. An estimator is simply a formula that is used to calculate the estimates, i.e. the parameters
that describe the relationship between two or more explanatory variables. There are an infinite
number of possible estimators; OLS is one choice that many people would consider a good one.
We can say that the OLS estimator is “best” – i.e. that it has the lowest variance among the
class of linear unbiased estimators. So it is optimal in the sense that no other linear, unbiased
estimator would have a smaller sampling variance. We could define an estimator with a lower
sampling variance than the OLS estimator, but it would either be non-linear or biased or both!
So there is a trade-off between bias and variance in the choice of the estimator.



4. What five assumptions are usually made about the unobservable error terms in the classical linear
regression model (CLRM)? Briefly explain the meaning of each. Why are these assumptions made?

4. A list of the assumptions of the classical linear regression model’s disturbance terms is given
in Box 2.3 on p.44 of the book.
We need to make the first four assumptions in order to prove that the ordinary least squares
estimators of  and  are “best”, that is to prove that they have minimum variance among the
class of linear unbiased estimators. The theorem that proves that OLS estimators are BLUE
(provided the assumptions are fulfilled) is known as the Gauss-Markov theorem. If these
assumptions are violated (which is dealt with in Chapter 4), then it may be that OLS estimators
are no longer unbiased or “efficient”. That is, they may be inaccurate or subject to fluctuations
between samples.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper claudiughiuzan. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77254 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,99  12x  verkocht
  • (7)
  Kopen