Samenvatting
Summary Administrative Law
- Instelling
- Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
Midterm preparation -- all notes (lecture, tutorials and readings)
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 12 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 12 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
1. Introduction and Character of Administrative LawCharacter of Admin Law
⇒ mechanisms of government - brand of national public law characterised by the involvement of the
government (so imbalance of powers) with public legal authority (interventionist and active) to decide
on public interest matters, and override private interests. [legal (laws and decisions) and non-legal acts]
● Objectives: → Downsides: allows for the creation of dual states [see Schotel 2021a]
○ Enable effective public policy: unilateral decision of one’s legal position
→ allows for lots of things (of the welfare state) to happen
■ Immediate compliance required!
■ With powers that criminal law does not have → no need of court permission
⇒ shaping lives of citizens for diff purposes
○ Ensure effective individual legal protection
● Instruments of Admin Law:
○ Nodality: organisation, collecting and communication of information, data
○ Authority: legal authority to make legal binding decisions
○ Treasure: competence to collect, distribute and reallocate money
○ Organisation: through civil servants and infrastructure to maintain order [Oakeshott]
■ POTENTIA: → modern state, to be able to enforce laws, physical power
● Characteristics / structure of admin law:
○ Forward looking: instructing behaviour of individuals
■ About improving current social state → permissive and instructive law
○ Dynamic and expansive: changes a lot and constantly expanding (through legislation
in Parliament) + because it follows political agenda
○ Detailed and technical: compared to other systems → very very detailed
○ Categorisation of people: technique of categorisation based on ascriptive
characteristics, instead of behaviour as in criminal law
■ Migration law: admin law allowing for anti-migration policies
⇒ limited protection in alien detention, humanitarian visas, free legal aid,
etc.
● Administrative decisions: done through Administrative Acts = legal, determine rights and
obligations, no consent needed, individual decisions ≠ general rules
○ Unilateral: can change legal position of subjects
○ Discretion: freedom to choose between reasonable alternatives
■ Legal, policy and factual discretion → legitimised by “technical expertise”
, ○ Presumption of legality: admin acts deemed lawful and have immediate legal effect
(only when admin withdrawing the decision or court annulling it that it looses its
legal effect)
○ Privilege of direct and forced execution: don’t need court permission (individuals can
appeal but not a practical reality)
● Effective individual legal protection:
○ Administrative review: same administration that reviews → cheaper and faster than
going through other courts, more expertise and better remedies than judicial
review
⇒ to higher hierarchies in the admin
○ Special administrative courts:
■ Admin court: not civil nor criminal court → tailored to state and admin
logic but also concerned with interests of the state
○ Judicial deference: referring back to the factual assessment and judgement of the
administration → more expertise as admin with whole overview of cases, not only
the ones presented in court
Difference between legal and non-legal acts
→ administration does both legal and non-legal acts
● Legal acts:
○ Administrative law, rules: legislation, decrees, rules and regulations → general
⇒ Parliament and administration (forward looking, etc.)
○ Administrative decisions: orders, permits, fines, etc. → individual level
→ determines legal position of a specific legal subject
■ Possible reactions: disobey and ignore
■ Remedies: judge invalidation
● Non-legal acts: physical execution of admin decisions, providing services, enforcement
→ cannot just ignore because it is physically happening, and remedy is compensation
○ Non-legal acts preceded by legal acts most times
→ puissance publique ≠ service publique
(1) publique authority, power → need it to execute these services
(2) services and tasks executed by the government → public tasks
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jessicafqiu. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,66. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67866 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen