100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Syntaxis II samenvatting van het boek 'Introducing Syntax' €3,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Syntaxis II samenvatting van het boek 'Introducing Syntax'

 140 keer bekeken  5 keer verkocht

Een samenvatting van het boek 'Introducing Syntax', behorende bij de colleges van Syntaxis II.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 11  pagina's

  • Ja
  • 13 november 2018
  • 11
  • 2017/2018
  • Samenvatting
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alles voor dit studieboek (5)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (3)
avatar-seller
123noam
Syntaxis samenvatng – Introducing Sytnax
Ch. 1
 Plural nouns = things; count(able) nouns = chair; mass nouns = buter; abstract = peace
 Nouns and verbs behave diferently hen it comes to the syntactc surroundings they can occur
in
o Nouns can be preceded by an artcle or adjectvess the door/*the seems
o Verbs can appear afer innnitve marker ‘to’s J. ants to .. /*J. ants to door

 Substitution test >> if t o elements X and Y share the same syntactc features, then in every
grammatcal sentence that contains X you can replace X by Y (and v.v.) and the sentence remains
grammatcal

 Functonal categories = closedcclass categories (artcles and complementsers)
 Lexical categories = opencclass categories (verbs and nouns)
 Whenever e cannot substtute element X for Y, there must be some feature that distnguishes
them
o Can be a categorical feature but it doesn’t have to be
 Syntax cares about categories; not ords
 Categorical features the property of a ord that tells us e.g. hether something is a verb or a
noun, or hether it belongs to some other category

Ch.2


Ch. 3 – dit is vanaf 3.3
 Passive sentence – the original OB takes over the positon of the SU, but retains its crole
 Every sentence must contain a SU
o May be lef unexpressed = subject drop (not absent; if so, the verb could never agree
ith it)
o Imperatve clauses
 Sentence ith eather verb – cannot contain an argument and must have a subject
o Expletve SU is inserted
 A passive verb assigns one fe er crole
 chierarchys henever a verb assigns one fe er crole, the crole that disappears is al ays the
highest one
 The type of crole carried by a subject or object, thus follo s directly from the chierarchy
 Ergative verb = can functon ithout the highest crole
o They only optonally assign the AGENT role
o The pirates sank the ship/the ship sank (agents and theme/theme)
 Highest crole has disappeared

 The entre string is a main clause; part of the main clause is an embedded clause
 John hopes to win the race – John is an argument and must be given a crole from a verb, but
hich one is responsible?
o A fourth argument, some unexpressed pronoun > PRO
o PRO – an empty arguments syntactcally present and so it can receive a crole
 It seems that John wins the race; *It hopes that John wins the race
o Seem does not assign a crole to its subject (p. 72!!)

, o Hope needs to assign a crole to its subject but it is just an expletve subject. Insertng it
leads to ungrammatcality because the AGENT role of hopes has not been assigned, in
violaton of ctheory.
o Consequence of ctheory and follo s directly from our hypotheses (p. 73/74)
 Restrictons on the occurrence of PRO
o PRO can only be the subject of a noncnnite clause
o [PRO to win the race]; *PRO loves John

Ch. 4
 One argument too fe can stll be OK if the context allo s for it; an argument too many is al ays
bad
 PRO can only functon as the subject of an embedded, noncnnite clause
o Other ise ‘*John loves PRO’ ould be grammatcal
o This does not follo from ctheory itself; ctheory allo s PRO to receive a crole
 Cases to distnguish the diferent forms of some pronouns
o Nominatve – she
o Accusatve – her
 AGENTcPATIENT distncton and nomcacc distncton are independent of each other
o He visited her; *Her was visiteds her is PATIENT in both sentences c>>
 PATIENTss sometmes nom., sometmes acc; and nom. is not reserved for AGENTs only
 Case theory puts restrictons on nominal arguments in general

 Diferent syntactc heads are responsible for diferent cases
 When a pronoun receives case from a prepositon, it is part of a consttuent that can drif a ay
from the verb a bit. When a pronoun gets its case from the verb, it has to be next to it
 A nominal argument that is not a subject, needs to be assigned accusatve case by either a verb
or a propositon
 Case is sometmes visible, but can sometmes be invisible too
o V and P assign a property that is not necessarily visible
 Syntactc dependencies = dependent relatonships bet een consttuents

 Nominatve case must be assigned by a head
 Embedded subjects do not al ays carry nominatve case
 Nominatve case marking is only possible if the sentence contains a nnite verb?
o May, can and must never carry an –s; but they don’t have noncnnite counterparts
 Lexical verbs – nnite and noncnnite forms
Modal aux – verbs like may, can and must
o To separate them from noncmodal aux. like has in Mary has walked
 The presence of modal AUX in a sentence allo s for the presence of a nominatve subject as ells
being nnite, modal AUX can assign nom. case


 Complementary distributons here one occurs, the others cannot longer occur
o *I buy eat sausages – they can all potentally nll the V slot, but once that slot is nlled by
one verb, other verbs are excluded from that positon
 If t o ords cannot cococcur together, this may mean that they strive to occupy the same
positon. But if t o ords can peacefully cococcur in a clause, it means that they are in a diferent
positon
o Modal verbs and lexical verbs are not in complementary distributon
 There is a single, separate positon in the structure for all nnite aux

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper 123noam. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 51683 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,49  5x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd